HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #15501  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2017, 11:22 AM
SJPhillyBoy's Avatar
SJPhillyBoy SJPhillyBoy is offline
Hello
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: SJ to Philly
Posts: 2,631
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15502  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2017, 12:03 PM
Gonzo the Great's Avatar
Gonzo the Great Gonzo the Great is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: the Henson Galaxy
Posts: 478
Quote:
Originally Posted by SJPhillyBoy View Post

Wow , that is some great news . Both sides of the river are working hard to make life
better for it's residents and metro area .
__________________
...... I had that weird dream again !
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15503  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2017, 3:58 PM
Mr Saturn64's Avatar
Mr Saturn64 Mr Saturn64 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Philly
Posts: 1,128
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milksteak View Post
This article puts Philly as a top contender, while also (incorrectly) calling it a "shrinking city". Definitely a different perspective and paints the whole situation in a more negative light.

https://www.google.com/amp/amp.slate.com...ose_the_contest_for_amazon_s_new_hq.html
If we get this, most of those negative attitudes toward Philly are going to slowly go away. Getting this is a must. It may very well not happen, but we can hope.

Any idea when they're announcing the winner.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15504  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2017, 4:47 PM
jsbrook jsbrook is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Bala Cynwyd
Posts: 3,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Saturn64 View Post
If we get this, most of those negative attitudes toward Philly are going to slowly go away. Getting this is a must. It may very well not happen, but we can hope.

Any idea when they're announcing the winner.
We must gun hard for this project no matter what. Even if we fail, it will help us to win future ones. It will probably be awhile before a decision is made and made public. I think the initial RFP responses are due on October 20.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15505  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2017, 5:55 PM
ScreamShatter ScreamShatter is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 2,103
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbrook View Post
We must gun hard for this project no matter what. Even if we fail, it will help us to win future ones. It will probably be awhile before a decision is made and made public. I think the initial RFP responses are due on October 20.
Can't be too long if they are wanting to start building in 2018 and ready to operate in 2019....wowzers. That's fast.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15506  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2017, 11:10 PM
City Wide City Wide is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,627
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raymond LuxuryYacht View Post
I would think any of the cities in Texas would be hard to beat if they're basing their decision on affordability and taxes. The city better come to the table with a strong, pro-business proposal.
Fortunately their RFP includes other factors, like mass transit and culture and general location, all features Philly has tons of. If this search is really open and the City can 1. pull together, (forget about crazy proposals for Gray's Ferry and Port Richmond) get both gov't and private industry (Comcast, Vanguard, Urban Outfitters) and institutions (Penn, Drexel etc.) and 2. find creative ways of making Amazon overlook some of the taxes the City operates, then I think the City should have a good shot.

But if all Amazon really wants is cheap land and hundreds of millions of dollars in tax breaks and welfare, then probably not. That's why I hope the City, or whoever is going to run the show, can be very creative. Some people have mentioned getting Drexel to partner up with Amazon since they are a work/study university. Maybe Wharton at Penn could have some direct tie ins to Amazon, like a established method where Amazon employees could earn a Wharton MBA. I hope the cities proposal can read between the lines and go beyond the usual "here's land, here's a pile of money, here's a bunch of new buses, here's our sports teams, here's our airport" stuff. Plant a fucking spy out in Seattle and find out what they're really looking for!

Last edited by City Wide; Sep 10, 2017 at 3:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15507  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2017, 11:24 PM
Philly Fan Philly Fan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by City Wide View Post
I hope the cities proposal can read between the lines and go beyond the usual "here's land, here's a pile of money, here's a bunch of new buses, here's our sports teams, here's our airport" stuff. Plant a fucking spy out in Seattle and find out what they're really looking for!
Hopefully, all of the recent experience and success promoting the city to get the DNC, Pope's visit, NFL Draft, World Heritage designation, etc., will come in handy here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15508  
Old Posted Sep 10, 2017, 12:07 AM
jsbrook jsbrook is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Bala Cynwyd
Posts: 3,658
City Council needs to fasttrack a bill that halves the wage tax and BIRT for companies that bring X amount of NEW jobs to the city. Seems simple to me. Write to your council people. Allan Domb will be supportive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15509  
Old Posted Sep 10, 2017, 3:19 AM
Xiubee Xiubee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 5
Most of the speculation on what cities are in the running has focused on the macro city/regional level characteristics. But does anyone on here know whether the other likely top candidates have potential development sites that fit the specific criteria? I've seen some talk about the Boston seaport, but I have no idea if that meets Amazon's criteria. And how about Atlanta, Chicago, etc., are they really in the running when taking Amazon's pretty massive SF/acreage requirements into account, particularly with existing transit access?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15510  
Old Posted Sep 10, 2017, 7:24 AM
acenturi acenturi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 352
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15511  
Old Posted Sep 10, 2017, 10:45 AM
Late1's Avatar
Late1 Late1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Philadelphia Metro (Chesco)
Posts: 2,285
^Isn't it funny how certain publications, many NYC-based (like the NY Times), are putting out articles basically saying "Here are the best cities for Amazon HQ2" -- and some of them specifically claiming "according to Amazon's own RFP" -- and then they knock Philly out of the running (or don't even mention us) because Philly's job growth supposedly isn't strong enough.

And yet the RFP says nothing about job growth being a qualifying factor. It's almost like these other cities (specifically NYC) knowing that the RFP was basically written for Philadelphia -- and they're trying desperately to divert their readers' and Amazon's attention away from Philly...
__________________
pretty, pretty pictures
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15512  
Old Posted Sep 10, 2017, 3:56 PM
mville1's Avatar
mville1 mville1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 140
As someone who is from Pennsylvania, I am trying to remain optimistic that either Philadelphia or Pittsburgh will land HQ2, but given the state's fiscal instability I am doubtful Pennsylvania will be able to offer a financial incentive package large enough to lure Amazon. The state still has not passed a revenue plan to fund the $32 billion budget, which became law back in June. I would think many state politicians would be reluctant to hand Amazon a large financial package when the state treasurer is saying Pennsylvania is running out of money. The optics would be terrible..."oh sorry UPENN, Penn State, and Pitt, etc...we have to withhold billions of dollars of funding because we don't have a revenue plan passed." Next day..."Pennsylvania is offering Amazon $xxx millions or billions in financial incentives for the HQ2 sweepstakes."

I sincerely hope when the state legislature reconvenes tomorrow they can pass a revenue plan in a timely manner; otherwise, Pennsylvania will be at a severe disadvantage when Philadelphia and Pittsburgh submit their RFP applications.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15513  
Old Posted Sep 10, 2017, 4:16 PM
Redddog Redddog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,762
Quote:
Originally Posted by mville1 View Post
As someone who is from Pennsylvania, I am trying to remain optimistic that either Philadelphia or Pittsburgh will land HQ2, but given the state's fiscal instability I am doubtful Pennsylvania will be able to offer a financial incentive package large enough to lure Amazon. The state still has not passed a revenue plan to fund the $32 billion budget, which became law back in June. I would think many state politicians would be reluctant to hand Amazon a large financial package when the state treasurer is saying Pennsylvania is running out of money. The optics would be terrible..."oh sorry UPENN, Penn State, and Pitt, etc...we have to withhold billions of dollars of funding because we don't have a revenue plan passed." Next day..."Pennsylvania is offering Amazon $xxx millions or billions in financial incentives for the HQ2 sweepstakes."

I sincerely hope when the state legislature reconvenes tomorrow they can pass a revenue plan in a timely manner; otherwise, Pennsylvania will be at a severe disadvantage when Philadelphia and Pittsburgh submit their RFP applications.
Good take.

It's all about money. Period. The RFP can't come out and say "hey, our massive economic engine is for sale to the highest bidder so here is a superficial list of prerequisites that makes us looks like we're an upstanding cultural steward, focused primarily on the most beneficial environment for our employees."

It's money. Whomever provides the best financial package, gets the deal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15514  
Old Posted Sep 10, 2017, 5:05 PM
iheartphilly's Avatar
iheartphilly iheartphilly is offline
Philly Rising Up!
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: motherEarth
Posts: 3,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by mville1 View Post
As someone who is from Pennsylvania, I am trying to remain optimistic that either Philadelphia or Pittsburgh will land HQ2, but given the state's fiscal instability I am doubtful Pennsylvania will be able to offer a financial incentive package large enough to lure Amazon. The state still has not passed a revenue plan to fund the $32 billion budget, which became law back in June. I would think many state politicians would be reluctant to hand Amazon a large financial package when the state treasurer is saying Pennsylvania is running out of money. The optics would be terrible..."oh sorry UPENN, Penn State, and Pitt, etc...we have to withhold billions of dollars of funding because we don't have a revenue plan passed." Next day..."Pennsylvania is offering Amazon $xxx millions or billions in financial incentives for the HQ2 sweepstakes."

I sincerely hope when the state legislature reconvenes tomorrow they can pass a revenue plan in a timely manner; otherwise, Pennsylvania will be at a severe disadvantage when Philadelphia and Pittsburgh submit their RFP applications.
I think the PA governor and state legislature needs to look at the big picture. Yes, the state is running out of money, but to refill the coffers, what better way then to build your tax base up. 50k jobs in total with an average of 100k in salary is an awesome tax base. This will put people to work, provide a service or product. It will have a compounding effect. I think it is an easy sell to PA taxpayers. PA needs to do a re-boot to its pension plan and balance its budget. But, getting more high paying jobs into PA and specifically Philly will be a win-win. So, I think the optics of this outweighs the optics of others. The state's return on investment (i.e., financial incentive package) will be many folds for years to come. Amazon in Philly will be an economic engine for us and the State like UPENN, CHOP, and the other educational institution.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15515  
Old Posted Sep 10, 2017, 5:07 PM
jsbrook jsbrook is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Bala Cynwyd
Posts: 3,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redddog View Post
Good take.

It's all about money. Period. The RFP can't come out and say "hey, our massive economic engine is for sale to the highest bidder so here is a superficial list of prerequisites that makes us looks like we're an upstanding cultural steward, focused primarily on the most beneficial environment for our employees."

It's money. Whomever provides the best financial package, gets the deal.
I don't think it's ALL about money, but that's certainly a large part of it, if not the dominant factor. We should be able to be competitive, though. We still have plenty of KOZ designated land around the city, and in every such zone, BIRT is completely waived for 15 years, as are property taxes. Schuylkill Yards still seems the best candidate to me and to check off most of their other boxes. That does a lot for us without even doing anything specific. We have some other things going for us. While not zero like Texas, personal income tax at the state level is lower than most states. Then the question is what other financial incentives we can and would offer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15516  
Old Posted Sep 10, 2017, 10:24 PM
acenturi acenturi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 352
I would not be surprised if Comcast contributes to and financially supports the city's proposal.

BTW, here is a Forbes "Contributor's" view that Philly should be selected. Unfortunately, IMO the last sentence sorta reduces his credibility.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/modeledbeha...adquarters-in-philadelphia/#2f3914b22624

Last edited by acenturi; Sep 10, 2017 at 10:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15517  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2017, 12:23 AM
iheartphilly's Avatar
iheartphilly iheartphilly is offline
Philly Rising Up!
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: motherEarth
Posts: 3,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by acenturi View Post
I would not be surprised if Comcast contributes to and financially supports the city's proposal.

BTW, here is a Forbes "Contributor's" view that Philly should be selected. Unfortunately, IMO the last sentence sorta reduces his credibility.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/modeledbeha...adquarters-in-philadelphia/#2f3914b22624
+1
Add Pierre R. Brandeau, CEO of FMC Corp. FMC is ofter not in the limelight, but this is a REAL company with broad reach of its products and services in the world.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15518  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2017, 12:34 AM
City Wide City Wide is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,627
Quote:
Originally Posted by iheartphilly View Post
I think the PA governor and state legislature needs to look at the big picture. Yes, the state is running out of money, but to refill the coffers, what better way then to build your tax base up. 50k jobs in total with an average of 100k in salary is an awesome tax base. This will put people to work, provide a service or product. It will have a compounding effect. I think it is an easy sell to PA taxpayers. PA needs to do a re-boot to its pension plan and balance its budget. But, getting more high paying jobs into PA and specifically Philly will be a win-win. So, I think the optics of this outweighs the optics of others. The state's return on investment (i.e., financial incentive package) will be many folds for years to come. Amazon in Philly will be an economic engine for us and the State like UPENN, CHOP, and the other educational institution.
Your statement is largely very rational and logically, but------my take on the State legislature is that 50% or more of its members absolutely hate Phila., and even if it were crystal clear that a aid package for Amazon would benefit the State, including the State gov't., they still wouldn't support it. What's that great line, Pa is Philly on one end, Pittsburgh on the other, with Alabama in-between.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15519  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2017, 12:58 PM
1487 1487 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by City Wide View Post
Your statement is largely very rational and logically, but------my take on the State legislature is that 50% or more of its members absolutely hate Phila., and even if it were crystal clear that a aid package for Amazon would benefit the State, including the State gov't., they still wouldn't support it. What's that great line, Pa is Philly on one end, Pittsburgh on the other, with Alabama in-between.
Deals offered by the state are mostly (if not completely) under the control of the governor. Tom Ridge had the authority to line up a huge giveaway for a shipbuilder in the 90s when they were trying to reactivate the navy yard.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15520  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2017, 12:58 PM
Nova08 Nova08 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 517
Quote:
Originally Posted by summersm343 View Post
^^The RFP is almost tailor made with Schuylkill Yards/30th Street Station District in mind... it's pretty crazy how well these developments would meet, and exceed Amazon's needs.

It really is up to the incentive package here. Philadelphia really needs to offer everything. We need to understand it's going to cost us. The rewards are worth it though. Not just from Amazon, but everything this would bring along.
I couldn't agree more. It is almost as though Amazon was a silent partner in SY all along.

FWIW, GE said that the financial incentives were not the deciding factor on the move to Boston. That said, with the way Amazon set up this bidding war, I find it hard to imagine that a city can win without ponying up a pretty hefty package.


Also, I hope the leaders around Philly all get on board that SY was bred for Amazon. I've seen quotes and tweets from various leaders suggesting the Navy Yard, the river front, Callowhill, etc. Those aren't bad ideas. But with the aggressive timeline and qualifications Amazon identified, they need a site that is ready to go as soon as the winner is announced. No zoning meetings, no zoning variances, no NIMBYs, no mass imminent domain, no councilmen prerogative, etc. Does the NY even have the space for 8 million sq ft? It is by no means fully built out, but that is a ton of space. I believe there is a height restriction due to the PHL flight path. How many 4-5 story buildings are needed for that much space, 10-15?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:07 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.