Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper
It's a style that can be found all around Montreal and its suburbs. Edmonton has complex building forms with strong Pomo motives to put it kindly. It's more Vancouver than Vancouver. Toronto design are much heavier on themes. They extend from cartoonish neodeco to whimsical 1950s futurism (think Prii). This Montreal style is more an evolution of the the Miesian builds in that city. There's no in your face theme. Any architectural flourish is there to simply break up the massing.
|
This reminds me of a brilliant speech about known knowns, or unknown knowns, or was is known unknowns? If you are more familiar with architecture you will have a stronger sense of the differences and trends. If you're more familiar with a given city you might definitely know if a proposal fits in or doesn't. You might otherwise feel like a building is generic, or that it could go anywhere; but this feeling doesn't necessarily mean that there aren't ways of narrowing it down that you are unaware of.
There are zero proposals in Halifax that look like this. The biggest reason why it's not a plausible proposal for that city is the massing; nobody does low podiums there because the rules allow taller podiums while the height limit encourages developers to fill in the lower parts of the envelope as much as possible (giving most buildings a chunky, squat appearance...). Aesthetically it's also a big departure from the much
busier and more colourful designs that are common there. It reminds me of twin towers that were proposed by an Ottawa developer a while ago that people immediately freaked out about and that were never even remotely approved or built. I'm pretty sure I would have guessed Montreal from that rendering based on the setting, dark masonry/concrete exterior, size, minimalism, and how angular it is. A number of recent Montreal projects look kind of like that.