Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster
What? Money supply is set by the federal government, ie the Federal Reserve in the US or Bank of Canada.
An influx of foreign capital does not increase the amount of Canadian Dollars in the country as that is completely controlled by the Bank of Canada's monetary policy.
Holding monetary policy steady, an influx of foreign capital into Canada will drive up EXCHANGE rates as demand for CAD increases while supply stays the same.
|
LOL...I knew somewhere that the question posed was an attempt by some here to engage my knowledge of international econ. Anyway, let's go at it.
Where did I say that a given influx of investment dollars increases the amount of "Canadian dollars" in the country per se? That's a dumb assertion at best because foreign investors may not necessarily buy a home with Canadian funds. I for one as an American invested American dollars here in Canada (not Canadian dollars).
What I said however was that when money is brought into the country by foreign investors it ends up in the Canadian banking system to add to the pool of potential investment dollars (thus the potential to drive down interest rates in general). Think of Quebec's investor immigrant program where foreign dollars can buy you "citizenship" and is used by the provincial government for local investment purposes (offsetting the need to borrow such desired funds from the Canadian banking system....thus helping to keep the competition (with the local private sector) for SCARCE investment funds (and attendant bank rates) low. Further, foreign dollars in the Canadian Banking system can be used by the feds to buy Canadian dollars on the global market in order to help prop the trading value of the Canadian dollar in the international currency marketplace.
I'm not sure where you studied your international economics but monetary policy/exchange rates etc. by governments/central banks etc. are inadvertently affected/impacted by the international flow levels of investment dollars.
Maybe if your formal training in economics had exposed you to such regimes as the I.M.F. and the World Bank which bailout many a (debt riddled/high interest rate/high exchange rate bound) third world economies you'd be more understanding of that which I speak.