HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7661  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2017, 2:56 PM
EdmTrekker EdmTrekker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,247
Quote:
Originally Posted by 240glt View Post
I hope EEDC steps up their game then, From a facilities point of view the Shaw is not that well run.
See below. EEDC is going in 2 different directions. EEDC ned to focus on economic development - like wining massive new Whirlpool Distribution centre that Calgary won and we did not. Not sure we were even in the running or knew about it. That should be the single mandate they have. Let some Regional Group look after tourism and convention like every other major City.
     
     
  #7662  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2017, 5:34 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,125
This goes to Council today in Edmonton, non-support from planning due to a lack of setback from the low-rise to the one side.

My guess is turned down.


http://wpmedia.edmontonjournal.com
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #7663  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2017, 8:17 PM
GreenSPACE's Avatar
GreenSPACE GreenSPACE is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 1,865
^I think it's pretty 50/50. Many councillors are not that sophisticated. Depends on how much sway the applicant has. I think there will be lots of discussion from some councillors to see if going back to admin for tweaks will satisfy the concerns.

Don't get me wrong, I think it should be turned down personally.
__________________
"A great city is not to be confounded with a populous one." - Aristotle
     
     
  #7664  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2017, 9:19 PM
hilman's Avatar
hilman hilman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,763

Last edited by hilman; Jun 29, 2017 at 1:40 AM.
     
     
  #7665  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2017, 9:22 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,125
(DC2) SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT CONTROL PROVISION
1. General Purpose
To establish a Site Specific Development Control Provision to accommodate a medium density mixed use development that is compatible in use and scale with the surrounding area and contributes to a pedestrian friendly streetscape.
2. Area of Application
This Provision shall apply to Lot 1 & 2, Block 75, Plan I8, located on the northeast corner of 99 Street NW and 83 Avenue NW, as shown on Schedule “A” of the Bylaw, adopting this Provision, Strathcona.









www.edmonton.ca july 10th
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #7666  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2017, 11:37 PM
Hardhatdan Hardhatdan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
This goes to Council today in Edmonton, non-support from planning due to a lack of setback from the low-rise to the one side.

My guess is turned down.


http://wpmedia.edmontonjournal.com
You know, what if they offered to so sort of tile mosaic art installation on the wall facing the building...combined vines or something...
There are ways to dress that up, but I doubt it files.
     
     
  #7667  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2017, 12:35 AM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,895
Update on Dub's never-ending Charles Camsell redevelopment
http://edmontonjournal.com/opinion/colum...-break-the-curse-of-the-camsell-hospital
     
     
  #7668  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2017, 1:32 AM
EdmTrekker EdmTrekker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,247
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hardhatdan View Post
You know, what if they offered to so sort of tile mosaic art installation on the wall facing the building...combined vines or something...
There are ways to dress that up, but I doubt it files.
Listening to it now live. Good rationale for design solutions and effort to meet neighbouring concerns. My sense before the vote call is that it will be approved. 19:32pm

Called that one wrong.

Last edited by EdmTrekker; Jun 29, 2017 at 2:57 AM.
     
     
  #7669  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2017, 3:19 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,125
Defeated.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #7670  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2017, 5:34 AM
CMD UW's Avatar
CMD UW CMD UW is offline
Urbis Maximus
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 12,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
Defeated.
Defeated by a large margin too.
__________________
"Call me sir, goddammit!"
     
     
  #7671  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2017, 3:05 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,125
Symphony having an impact.





     
     
  #7672  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2017, 3:27 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,125
WSP

twitter.com/dbayeg
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #7673  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2017, 3:36 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,125
We need about 100 more of these in central Edmonton. Townhouse podiums are absolutely KEY to keeping certain demographics in the core.


twitter.com/ianoyeg
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #7674  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2017, 4:08 PM
Urban recluse Urban recluse is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4,797
Absolutely! Townhomes without a tower above are needed too; giving residents a small backyard will attract more people.
     
     
  #7675  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2017, 4:54 PM
s4.audios's Avatar
s4.audios s4.audios is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,320
Feels like Symphony is going up real fast now. This tower is going to be a great addition to the skyline from the South. An area that hasn't changed for quite some time.
     
     
  #7676  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2017, 5:00 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,125
My only worries are the north elevation and the townhouse finish quality/detail.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #7677  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2017, 5:22 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,125
Love Ultima's impact, Encore in this shot is going to be amazing and our big-boy Stantec is going to blow people away.


twitter.com/thebinster
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #7678  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2017, 7:19 PM
B.ike's Avatar
B.ike B.ike is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 308
^ encore will block this person's view of the beige CCM
     
     
  #7679  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2017, 8:18 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,518
Quote:
Originally Posted by B.ike View Post
^ encore will block this person's view of the beige CCM
That picture only serves to remind me what a dumpster fire CCM has become. That hotel wart on top only adds to the 🞵🞵🞵 meter. If I owned CCM, I'd build Delta a new tower elsewhere on the site and then get rid of that existing open sore.

(either that or all I need is an extended holiday, or both?)
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
     
     
  #7680  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2017, 9:53 PM
canucklehead2 canucklehead2 is offline
Sex Marxist of Notleygrad
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: YEG
Posts: 6,846
Would love to see the the whole thing re-skinned in Smoked black glass or even Green living wall panels and transparent glass... Or recreate the old Eatons and Woodwards Facades with modernist neutrality... Anything but the overbearingly brutalist pre-cast concrete bunker look that still stands...
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:49 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.