Quote:
Originally Posted by speedog
Yah, but Calgary's Mount Royal is not in reference to any mountain or near mountain - you've been there, no?
Hell, I used to move in Mount Pleasant in Calgary and I don't believe anyone living there would be dumb enough to think that it's name was in reference to a mountain in that community.
Mount Royal in Montreal - different deal, wouldn't you agree?
|
I am not sure if I visited that neighbourhood specifically, but I remember that part of town was fairly hilly, so figured the point stood.
Also, Mount Royal in Montreal does have a prominence of 233m, compared to Mount Whyte's 140m, Whitehorn's 167m, and a whole slew of others with under 200m of prominence.
So Alberta's sit on a higher plateau, but Mount Royal is still base to peak taller than many of them.
(And base to top should be how we measure, not peak to sea level, unless folks want to start claiming Lake Louise has the tallest buildings in Canada.

)