HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4501  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2017, 3:26 PM
speedog's Avatar
speedog speedog is offline
Moran supreme
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,579
Quote:
Originally Posted by ainvan View Post
Curious, early morning shot from Crescent Road NW?
__________________
Just a wee bit below average prairie boy in Canada's third largest city and fourth largest CMA
     
     
  #4502  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2017, 5:00 PM
cyeg66's Avatar
cyeg66 cyeg66 is offline
Contôleur aérien YYC
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Really, really north Leduc
Posts: 1,302
^ great lighting (as far as low light pics go) & reflection.
__________________
Trainer of dolphins and certified Shorkie whisperer
     
     
  #4503  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2017, 9:02 PM
isotack isotack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
Maybe you should confirm what you believe before opening your mouth. This is taking from a condo in Scarborough Centre. The townhouses in question are a redevelopment of a former industrial site at Midland and Ellesmere. The entire area is still mostly industrial including a big ass, dirty as hell, paper plant a hop, skip and jump at Progress and Midland.

The hilarity is I don't have a problem with heavy industry in Scarborough. I just have a problem with its piecemeal planning.
Son you have no idea what heavy industry is. That "big assed' paper mill (Atlantic) recycles box board...it has one small paper maker. Sorry...not 'Heavy industry". The Atlantic plant in Whitby is bigger.

Midland is still home to some small stuff, mostly on Midwest. The town houses are on the former site of the former Fleshmans Margarine plant. Much of Scarborough's industrial land has been turned to big box plazas. Or Mosks, temples or non denomination pop-up churches. YOU might want to take a closer look.

The warehouses are gone too. Mostly moved north to Vaughan and west to Milton

As for heavy industry...the GM van plant came close (former Frigidaire), FAG, GE, Ford Glass, AG Simpson and a myriad of others that ARE ALL GONE! Actually, Oshawa had far more in it's day.

if you want heavy industry, go to Hamilton or Montreal. Steel, locomotives, castings, glass, ...etc.

Scarborough is not the nasty place you want it to be.
     
     
  #4504  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2017, 9:05 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 68,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monolith View Post
Boring, defined.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #4505  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2017, 9:19 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
Boring, defined.
Nah, this is the definition of boring:

https://www.treehugger.com/urban-design/look-how-suburbs-are-changing-and-growing.html
     
     
  #4506  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2017, 11:50 PM
cyeg66's Avatar
cyeg66 cyeg66 is offline
Contôleur aérien YYC
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Really, really north Leduc
Posts: 1,302
I'd say they're (virtually) one and the same, except one is stacked vertically.
__________________
Trainer of dolphins and certified Shorkie whisperer
     
     
  #4507  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2017, 12:42 AM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by isotack View Post
Son you have no idea what heavy industry is. That "big assed' paper mill (Atlantic) recycles box board...it has one small paper maker. Sorry...not 'Heavy industry". The Atlantic plant in Whitby is bigger.

Midland is still home to some small stuff, mostly on Midwest. The town houses are on the former site of the former Fleshmans Margarine plant. Much of Scarborough's industrial land has been turned to big box plazas. Or Mosks, temples or non denomination pop-up churches. YOU might want to take a closer look.

The warehouses are gone too. Mostly moved north to Vaughan and west to Milton

As for heavy industry...the GM van plant came close (former Frigidaire), FAG, GE, Ford Glass, AG Simpson and a myriad of others that ARE ALL GONE! Actually, Oshawa had far more in it's day.

if you want heavy industry, go to Hamilton or Montreal. Steel, locomotives, castings, glass, ...etc.

Scarborough is not the nasty place you want it to be.
Should learn to comprehend before concerning yourself with semantics. We are talking about zoning here. This plant isn't allowed for employment industrial zoning because it's a dirty fucking plant. Size is redundant. We also discussed the disappearance of industry from Toronto. We don't need a pedantic history lesson of all these companies across the GTA. We are not opposed to these operations either or are we going to based the greatness of a place on the existence of these operations. These parts of Scarborough suck because of the lousy built form and piecemeal zoning supported by the worst disposable, inhuman, car unfriendly development ever contemplated ... big box retail.
     
     
  #4508  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2017, 1:21 AM
SkahHigh's Avatar
SkahHigh SkahHigh is offline
More transit please
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beedok View Post
Anyone know what street in Markham that is?
     
     
  #4509  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2017, 4:24 AM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,889
I wish. I'm curious how it looks now.

edit ... found it
https://www.google.ca/maps/@43.845795,-7...MjnmicjknkrAEsnMb2FnA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

Last edited by WhipperSnapper; Jun 12, 2017 at 4:36 AM.
     
     
  #4510  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2017, 4:36 AM
GlassCity's Avatar
GlassCity GlassCity is offline
Rational urbanist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 5,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
Boring, defined.
I mean we're no Edmonton but we sure are trying. If only more of those towers were office and not residential. That would make the ground level way more interesting.
     
     
  #4511  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2017, 7:03 AM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
I wish. I'm curious how it looks now.

edit ... found it
https://www.google.ca/maps/@43.845795,-7...MjnmicjknkrAEsnMb2FnA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
What's with everyone forcing a wider driveway when it's clearly meant to be a single driveway??!! Ugh
     
     
  #4512  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2017, 12:40 PM
speedog's Avatar
speedog speedog is offline
Moran supreme
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,579
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
I wish. I'm curious how it looks now.

edit ... found it
https://www.google.ca/maps/@43.845795,-7...MjnmicjknkrAEsnMb2FnA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
Well that certainly is much more dense than my community but aesthetically, ugh.
__________________
Just a wee bit below average prairie boy in Canada's third largest city and fourth largest CMA
     
     
  #4513  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2017, 1:17 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
I wish. I'm curious how it looks now.

edit ... found it
https://www.google.ca/maps/@43.845795,-7...MjnmicjknkrAEsnMb2FnA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
A few things about this (and the other infamous photo - which I've seen used many times to illustrate suburbia in the U.S. BTW)...

First of all, that aerial photo has been around for a long time (a couple of decades?) and if this streetview is indeed the same area, it's astonishing that the area has not grown more of a tree canopy since then. My street is not even 15 years old and right now if you walk down it you see leaves as much as you see the façades of the houses (probably a 50-50 mix).

On another front, this particular development and its ilk are criticized quite harshly, but what's interesting is that in layout it mimicks dense inner city areas with SFHs, like much of the old pre-merger Toronto. (I realize it's not a perfect grid with a traditional commercial main street at the end of the block, but the way the houses are spaced, etc. is quite similar to, say, Parkdale where there are SFHs. I have no idea if this is intentional aping or if it's just a question of squeezing as many homes to sell as possible out of the available land.

I mean, would you guys prefer this?

https://www.google.ca/maps/@43.1775351,-...Cm5QFmka-2mp72mcXlsHQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
__________________
Loin des yeux, loin du coeur.
     
     
  #4514  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2017, 1:32 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,889
It is the same. Focus on the semi with the red garage doors in the lower centre of the photo and compare it to streetview.

There's no room for trees with street front driveways. The few trees in the neighbourhood are struggling. This also looks to be built at a much higher density than Parkdale not that it really matters. There's infill in Toronto at an even greater density than this that is tree lined. The reason? Laneways.



You don't have to go to New York. That looks butt ugly.

These are even newer communities in Markham.

https://www.google.ca/maps/@43.8755906,-...tch%3D-7%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656

https://www.google.ca/maps/@43.8978315,-...tch%3D-7%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656

These are older communities in Markham

https://www.google.ca/maps/@43.8758153,-...itch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656


https://www.google.ca/maps/@43.8925254,-...itch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656
     
     
  #4515  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2017, 1:44 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
It is the same. Focus on the semi with the red garage doors in the lower centre of the photo and compare it to streetview.

There's no room for trees with street front driveways. The few trees in the neighbourhood are struggling. This also looks to be built at a much higher density than Parkdale not that it really matters. There's infill in Toronto at an even greater density than this that is tree lined. The reason? Laneways.



You don't have to go to New York. That looks butt ugly.

These are even newer communities in Markham.

https://www.google.ca/maps/@43.8755906,-...tch%3D-7%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656

https://www.google.ca/maps/@43.8978315,-...tch%3D-7%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656

These are older communities in Markham

https://www.google.ca/maps/@43.8758153,-...itch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656


https://www.google.ca/maps/@43.8925254,-...itch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656
The leafier ones you posted are quite similar to what my street looks like.
__________________
Loin des yeux, loin du coeur.
     
     
  #4516  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2017, 1:54 PM
begratto's Avatar
begratto begratto is offline
Explorateur urbain
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Verdun > Montréal > Québec > Canada
Posts: 1,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
It is the same. Focus on the semi with the red garage doors in the lower centre of the photo and compare it to streetview.

There's no room for trees with street front driveways. The few trees in the neighbourhood are struggling. This also looks to be built at a much higher density than Parkdale not that it really matters. There's infill in Toronto at an even greater density than this that is tree lined. The reason? Laneways.
If trees can survive, and even thrive, on streets like these ones in Montreal, they can certainly survive in suburban settings, even with front driveways :

https://goo.gl/maps/E8oT3fftJDF2

https://goo.gl/maps/idck1d9NRW52
__________________
Venit ad oppidum!

Last edited by begratto; Jun 12, 2017 at 2:08 PM.
     
     
  #4517  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2017, 2:01 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,889
It was a bad era for trees in subdivision design. It's still not great as density have gone even higher and people still park in the front but, you do see a more concerted effort in design to provide room for trees to grow. It's only going to improve as long as the feedback to developers asks for more space for mature trees.
     
     
  #4518  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2017, 2:09 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by begratto View Post
If trees can survive, and even thrive, on streets like these one in Montreal, they can certainly survive in suburban settings, even with front driveways :

https://goo.gl/maps/E8oT3fftJDF2

https://goo.gl/maps/idck1d9NRW52
Of course. I'm factoring in that modern subdivisions are heavily graded with very heavy machinery that compacts the earth. The good top soil is sold off to be coloured and package as black earth at your local garden centre. It costs the developer money to dig a proper hole in the compacted ground, fill it with top soil and plant a tree so it can flourish. They don't do this out of the kindness of there heart.

Also, none of your examples show trees in the narrow median between driveways. Roots can spread under sidewalk. People aren't that heavy. The weight of parked cars and the soil conditions mentioned above make it nearly impossible for trees to spread roots under driveways.
     
     
  #4519  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2017, 2:14 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,889
oops
     
     
  #4520  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2017, 3:18 PM
ainvan ainvan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto/Vancouver
Posts: 965
Not a skyline pic, but I like the angle.


Dominion Public Building - Toronto by Tom Baker. (tombaker.photography), on Flickr
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:50 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.