Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller
The responses on Frances Bula's twitter equate to "traditional is boring":
https://twitter.com/fabulavancouver
Personally, I think the traditional building would be more stable in an earthquake, easier to meet LEED with punch-out windows, easier to maintain (window wash), won't have a leaky window wall and will provide rectangular living spaces.
|
Yes precisely. Though I wouldn't call them traditional in style. I would call it Classic Modernism. Streamlined machine era styling.
As for being 90's POMO there's a fine line between that and a proper revival of a distinct era of design.
POMO was an unarticulated mishmash of eras from Victorian/Edwardian to Streamlined Deco with a gawdy and tacky colour palate. Often using inferior quality materials such as EIFS stucco, fiberglass, plastic etc. for details and do not age well. The quality of the materials and execution of good detailing will be key.