HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2581  
Old Posted May 17, 2017, 3:27 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,331
hahahaha oops. That was actually a typo!

On the FreeP. I can get in to those articles sometimes without dong anything. Other times when it asks me to log in, I just close it down and move on to a free news article. I couldn't be bothered to expend effort for their articles when the info is available elsewhere.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2582  
Old Posted May 17, 2017, 6:07 PM
robertocarlos robertocarlos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 820
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
I don't get the need for so many parkades. 290 stall there. 700 stall within skycity. Maybe that's changed within slycity. But I'm not allowed to look at free press.
The numbers don't seem right. Look at the Sky parking lot site and then look at the foot-print of the St. Regis. They can't put 72 cars on one floor unless half the spaces are for Minis. No F150 parking.

Sky lot has 70-80 spaces currently.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2583  
Old Posted May 17, 2017, 6:10 PM
robertocarlos robertocarlos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 820
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
I don't get the need for so many parkades. 290 stall there. 700 stall within skycity. Maybe that's changed within slycity. But I'm not allowed to look at free press.
They have 70-80 cars parked on the lot now. They would need 9-10 stories of parking.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2584  
Old Posted May 17, 2017, 6:34 PM
WolselyMan WolselyMan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 118
I decided to take a walk downtown a week ago, and one thing that really struck me all of a sudden was just how much the whole area tries to cater solely for the needs of the automobile. Which is strange because downtowns are usually the parts of a city that are the most inconvenient for cars, and the most pedestrian friendly. And I'm not really talking about about all the parking lots we have flooding the area. Just the sheer amount of parkades we have lining the streets, or even the amount of buildings that have a parkade component built into them, sticks out quite a lot if you're a pedestrian in the area. The entrances to the parkades are always located right on the street, severely interfering with the continuity of the sidewalk. In fact these entrances are so common that only the avenues such as Graham, St. Mary and York are designed specifically with pedestrians in mind, with businesses and retail lining the sidewalk. The streets on the other hand are usually devoid of actual retail, and are instead filled with parkade entrances and car ramps. It's almost as if they take on the role of alleyways for the buildings on the avenues; relegated to doing all the backstage work of hosting loading zones and car garages.

Basically, it feels like we're trying to take a sprawling big box store retail district and try to compress it into an area that was never originally even meant to cater to automobiles in the first place. The result is an area that's both too cramped and elaborate to use a car conveniently, and too discontinuous and visually unappealing to create any valid pedestrian experience.

I completely understand the strong appeal of parkades. They drastically eliminate the need for ugly parking lots by creating a far more efficient use of land. The only real problem is that when you do need to build a parkade somehere, they're far more of a blight on the entire area than a parking lot would - particularly when you try to squeeze one into a tight crowded space.
In addition to them usually not fitting in with the other surrounding buildings, they smell of concentrated car fumes that leak into the surrounding air of the street. Absolutely awful for businesses surrounding the area. I don't know about the rest of you but I'd much rather prefer sitting out on a patio that's right next to a parking lot, rather than a giant smelly and unsightly parkade. Rory street Parkade anyone? https://www.google.ca/maps/@49.8969751,-97.1369404,3a,75y,251.4h,91.96t/data=!3m1!1e3

This is why I have so much respect for True North Square taking the extra care to put all of their parking underground. TNSE seems to understand the general rule that cars tend to ruin everything (except for the people driving inside them).

SkyCity already has a parkade built right into it. This should be enough. Replacing the St. Regis hotel with a parkade is the most insensitive thing you could possibly do for the block.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2585  
Old Posted May 17, 2017, 7:07 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,331
They said 700 stalls. I think the article is a bit old, but I caught this blurb in the Google search. I didn't get in to the article.

build a 55-storey condominium/commercial tower in downtown Winnipeg. ... Sky city: 'It really is going to happen,' says ... a 700-stall parkade, ...

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/business/it-really-is-going-to-happen-257456221.html

Its supposed to be a 4 storey parkade with one level underground. The parkade is to be contained within the podium and not visible from the streets IIRC. I remember counting the stalls before and it was something like 120-130 stalls. That doesn't include the lot adjacent to the St Regis.

I assume the stalls may be narrower and the parkade layout better optimized for the size of land. Again, lots of parking going to be available in the area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2586  
Old Posted May 17, 2017, 7:14 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
You're right, WolselyMan. Unfortunately, it's really only a handful of downtown streets (mainly the E-W ones as you pointed out, like Portage, Graham and Broadway) that really offer much continuity when it comes to pedestrian streetscapes. The N-S streets tend to be constantly interrupted by parking lots and parkade entrances.

The end result is the lack of any kind of continuous strips of storefronts with shops, restaurants, etc. that would be really enticing to pedestrians.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2587  
Old Posted May 17, 2017, 7:19 PM
Cyro's Avatar
Cyro Cyro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post

build a 55-storey condominium/commercial tower in downtown Winnipeg. ... Sky city: 'It really is going to happen,' says ... a 700-stall parkade, ...

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/business/it-really-is-going-to-happen-257456221.html

.
Same info in the OP, (- the 55 floors) don't know if anythings changed as of this point.
__________________
♥ ♥
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2588  
Old Posted May 17, 2017, 7:46 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,331
Yeah and the 55 storey thing was more of a relative building height. The equivalent to 55 storey. 45 actual floors with the big sloped feature at the top.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2589  
Old Posted May 18, 2017, 7:42 AM
Only The Lonely..'s Avatar
Only The Lonely.. Only The Lonely.. is offline
Portage & Main 50 below
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,872
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
The equivalent to 55 storey. 45 actual floors with the big sloped feature at the top.
That sloped feature is where people will gather to worship Gozer.
__________________
WINNIPEG: Home of Canada's first skyscraper!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2590  
Old Posted May 18, 2017, 1:21 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is online now
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,916
^^^ What are you doing up at 2:42 am on a school night?
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2591  
Old Posted May 18, 2017, 6:32 PM
robertocarlos robertocarlos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 820
I'm mistaken about Sky-City parking. I was counting only half the lot that looks the size of St. Regis hotel. If the used the whole of the 2 lots for underground parking that would go a long ways to their 700-990 parking spots.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2592  
Old Posted May 18, 2017, 8:48 PM
hexrae's Avatar
hexrae hexrae is offline
Armchair urbanist
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 922
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
^^^ What are you doing up at 2:42 am on a school night?
Watching Ghostbusters obviously.
__________________
[Insert profound statement here]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2593  
Old Posted May 19, 2017, 3:11 AM
PhongNguyen PhongNguyen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 6
Hi everyone, I am not really a new member, I've followed this post for more than 2 yrs but this is my first post. I think it's unfair to suspend lilwayne account, he is the most optimistic person here. Without him, is thread is so quiet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2594  
Old Posted May 19, 2017, 6:14 AM
Labroco's Avatar
Labroco Labroco is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 844
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
Not necessarily a terrible idea... think about it, 300 Main will be huge and won't have any new parking (to my knowledge, anyway) getting built along with it.

Without new off-street parking facilities to relieve some of the pressure, my concern is that we could start seeing marginal, older downtown buildings having a greater rate of "accidental fires" that pave the way for new surface parking lots, kind of like what has sprung up on Albert next to the St. Charles.
My concern is not so much the demo of the non designated 100 year old St Regis but rather that safe guards SHOULD be put into place now to ensure the parkade gets built and the occupants are housed and not end up on the street.
1) To allow the demo without building permit in place is a mistake.
2) To not have a $1,000,000 performance bond in place to ensure completion is a mistake.
3) To not ensure repayment of CV's $3,000,000 mortgage before demolition is a mistake.
4) To have CV defer their $3,000,000 mortgage and allow any other lender ahead of them is a mistake.
5) To not place a restrictive covenant on the St Regis title NOW to forbid ANY surface parking on the site in the future even on a temporary basis is a mistake.

It's important for CV to encouraged development in the area but must put safeguards in place to ensure it will not turn into a "Temporary" parking lot as other sites in the area have become.

Also there has been no mention of where the relocated residences will be housed. Are these people relegated to the street or have social services been engaged to ensure these people are housed somewhere? This will be the second time a large demolition has occurred displacing impoverished Manitobans in the area. There is a responsibility to ensure they have a place to go... To replace this housing for "temporary parking" in the future if the project does move forward is not an acceptable outcome either...

I hope for the success of the project but stress there can be no future wiggle room for surface parking on this site. Let's also not forget the many projects CV has had success with. We hope this wil also be one of them.


I hope someone is taking notes...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2595  
Old Posted May 19, 2017, 1:23 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is online now
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,916
^^^

Don't worry Labroco,

I'm taking notes.......
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2596  
Old Posted May 19, 2017, 7:35 PM
Wolf13 Wolf13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,664
Labroco dropping fire

Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtWednesday View Post
Woohoo 45th floor is back!
It's the media... much like NHL trade rumours, it doesn't really matter until it's going ahead and confirmed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtWednesday View Post
From the article


Question: If they start digging in the middle of October which will take several months and start forming Piles late winter/early spring, you think this will help with hoarding costs? I think I'd try to get much of the podium done as possible before the start of winter 2018 so each new floor after that requires less hoarding.
Concrete gets quite warm when it cures and the ground deep below isn't cold. Piles are not a "winter" concern for builders. This lets them tackle the grade beams, caps and slabs in spring


Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
I don't get the need for so many parkades. 290 stall there. 700 stall within skycity. Maybe that's changed within slycity. But I'm not allowed to look at free press.
Winnipeg obsesses over free parking like its a fucking civil right... all major downtowns have trouble for street level PAID parking... but they also have is thousands of highrises, many of which have their own underground parkades.

Parkades are super expensive, even moreso if they go underground, so you make your money back by building taller and taller... we don't have enough highrises with parkades and our office market cannot fill more tall highrises so these parkades have to go somewhere... and we have a lot of surface lots. It's atleast a much more efficient use of a surface lot.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
Someone else might want to chime in, but I think on large excavation projects it is easier to heat and hoard excavation in winter than to deal with constant de-watering and unstable soils in summer months. A lot of large projects start in late fall.
I think it is, as I mentioned above, more to do with piling in winter, so they can start the bigtime concrete work first thing in spring... if you're excavating in summer then you're piling in fall and doing concrete in winter and paying more money... you also wouldn't delay the conrete until spring because it's hard to keep a job site moving if you break its momentum frequently, not to mention you lose money for keeping it open,

Quote:
Originally Posted by WolselyMan View Post
I decided to take a walk downtown a week ago, and one thing that really struck me all of a sudden was just how much the whole area tries to cater solely for the needs of the automobile. Which is strange because downtowns are usually the parts of a city that are the most inconvenient for cars, and the most pedestrian friendly. And I'm not really talking about about all the parking lots we have flooding the area. Just the sheer amount of parkades we have lining the streets, or even the amount of buildings that have a parkade component built into them, sticks out quite a lot if you're a pedestrian in the area. The entrances to the parkades are always located right on the street, severely interfering with the continuity of the sidewalk. In fact these entrances are so common that only the avenues such as Graham, St. Mary and York are designed specifically with pedestrians in mind, with businesses and retail lining the sidewalk. The streets on the other hand are usually devoid of actual retail, and are instead filled with parkade entrances and car ramps. It's almost as if they take on the role of alleyways for the buildings on the avenues; relegated to doing all the backstage work of hosting loading zones and car garages.

Basically, it feels like we're trying to take a sprawling big box store retail district and try to compress it into an area that was never originally even meant to cater to automobiles in the first place. The result is an area that's both too cramped and elaborate to use a car conveniently, and too discontinuous and visually unappealing to create any valid pedestrian experience.

I completely understand the strong appeal of parkades. They drastically eliminate the need for ugly parking lots by creating a far more efficient use of land. The only real problem is that when you do need to build a parkade somehere, they're far more of a blight on the entire area than a parking lot would - particularly when you try to squeeze one into a tight crowded space.
In addition to them usually not fitting in with the other surrounding buildings, they smell of concentrated car fumes that leak into the surrounding air of the street. Absolutely awful for businesses surrounding the area. I don't know about the rest of you but I'd much rather prefer sitting out on a patio that's right next to a parking lot, rather than a giant smelly and unsightly parkade. Rory street Parkade anyone? https://www.google.ca/maps/@49.8969751,-97.1369404,3a,75y,251.4h,91.96t/data=!3m1!1e3

This is why I have so much respect for True North Square taking the extra care to put all of their parking underground. TNSE seems to understand the general rule that cars tend to ruin everything (except for the people driving inside them).

SkyCity already has a parkade built right into it. This should be enough. Replacing the St. Regis hotel with a parkade is the most insensitive thing you could possibly do for the block.
As I mentioned above, going underground is super expensive. To offset that cost, you need more revenue. To get more revenue you need more leasable square feet which means you have to build taller and get more tenants. To build tall there needs to be demand, which Winnipeg doesn't have.

Yes, Winnipeg needs to become more pedestrian friendly and yes, Cities like Toronto, Vancouver, etc ARE more pedestrian friendly, but they also have (or have had, during past growth periods) far more demanding office markets that allow them to build very HIGH... and many of these highrises have underground parkades as their costs are offset by a higher density of rent-paying tenants. In Winnipeg we still need that parking as the residential market downtown hasn't matured yet and we have to park somewhere, so parkades (which are a major improvement over a surface lot) happen sometimes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2597  
Old Posted May 20, 2017, 1:00 AM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
Saw this posted on reddit... some interesting pictures from the sales centre, including the sales board

http://imgur.com/a/9FHxU
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2598  
Old Posted May 20, 2017, 3:23 AM
cheswick's Avatar
cheswick cheswick is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: South Kildonan
Posts: 3,007
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
Saw this posted on reddit... some interesting pictures from the sales centre, including the sales board

http://imgur.com/a/9FHxU
Spec sheet says 298 parking spots. Someone with more patience then me could count the sales.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2599  
Old Posted May 20, 2017, 1:12 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,331
300 stalls is a lot more reasonable. Its does say residential parkade. I wonder if there is a smaller commercial parkade, maybe 150 stalls or so.

Last edited by bomberjet; May 21, 2017 at 11:30 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2600  
Old Posted May 20, 2017, 4:13 PM
oftheMoon's Avatar
oftheMoon oftheMoon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: East Exchanger
Posts: 675
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheswick View Post
Spec sheet says 298 parking spots. Someone with more patience then me could count the sales.
Unless I miscounted which is entirely possible, there are 223 dots of all colours. I assume red is sold, blue is combined units and green is pending?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:27 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.