HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7121  
Old Posted May 18, 2017, 3:28 PM
wacko wacko is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 419
Maybe the city should just sit on the railyard land until the timing is appropriate for mixed residential/commercial towers. Instead, perhaps they should develop the Taylor Field land first. Surely there must be some demand for affordable medium-density housing, no?
     
     
  #7122  
Old Posted May 18, 2017, 3:37 PM
thefourthtower thefourthtower is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Rueannatta
Posts: 2,597
Quote:
Originally Posted by wacko View Post
Maybe the city should just sit on the railyard land until the timing is appropriate for mixed residential/commercial towers. Instead, perhaps they should develop the Taylor Field land first. Surely there must be some demand for affordable medium-density housing, no?
No tenders where giving out yet , to many naysayers lets give them a chance to see what develops
     
     
  #7123  
Old Posted May 18, 2017, 3:40 PM
micheal micheal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 415
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
I agree. Timing is not good and probably won't be for many years. The City incorporates feedback from people who have no intention of backing it up with money. They say they want large suburban style condos next to greenspace with a grocery store and tons of parking, but would never pay what that would truly cost.

All i know is that if developers do what they want ...We will end up with a big box or 2 there and it will kill any future development in the warehouse district. the problem with the city is that they don't stick to a plan. ie: parking lots downtown, harbour landing, new movie theatre in the east. What kind of city are we going to build if a vision and plan is presented and a developer wants to go completely the other way? Are we going to accept development for the sake of development. No.

"The City incorporates feedback from people who have no intention of backing it up with money."

Your making assumptions .
     
     
  #7124  
Old Posted May 18, 2017, 4:49 PM
J-Walker J-Walker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by micheal View Post
All i know is that if developers do what they want ...We will end up with a big box or 2 there and it will kill any future development in the warehouse district. the problem with the city is that they don't stick to a plan. ie: parking lots downtown, harbour landing, new movie theatre in the east. What kind of city are we going to build if a vision and plan is presented and a developer wants to go completely the other way? Are we going to accept development for the sake of development. No.

"The City incorporates feedback from people who have no intention of backing it up with money."

Your making assumptions .
There is no chance there is going to be big box retail in that location. You are assuming big box stores would actually even want to locate there, which they wouldn't. Big box retail requires lots of relatively cheap land for free parking - this area will not be that. Also, they need access to regional customers which usually requires a location near free-flowing expressways (ring road, bypass, highway, etc.) on the edge of the city. Then there is the issue of zoning. You could assume the same zoning used downtown or a modified version of it would be applied here. If that is the case, that type of retail would never be permitted. A good example of a location where the City seems to have gotten the zoning correct would be the mixed use area off of Broad Street across from the CBC building.
     
     
  #7125  
Old Posted May 18, 2017, 8:45 PM
aberrant aberrant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 246
There will be more info coming soon on the Railyards. There hasn't been much said since last August, so this is good news.

As a business owner next to the railyards, and as the Vice Chair of the Warehouse District, I am very engaged and excited, but also fully aware of the challenges, timelines and expectations around a full build out of the area.

I havent heard of any interest or support to have big box retail or office towers on that space of land. Plans vs reality don't always match up, and things can always change, but there is currently no desire from any stakeholders (including developers) for this type of stuff.

By the way, Hillberg and Berk, and Look Agency are moving into the old Kozan's Furniture building this weekend in the Warehouse District. Lots of cool stuff happening in our area, expect to see a lot more of us in the public spotlight going forward.
     
     
  #7126  
Old Posted May 19, 2017, 2:18 AM
BrutallyDishonest2 BrutallyDishonest2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by aberrant View Post
I havent heard of any interest or support to have big box retail or office towers on that space of land.
An office tower, maybe not, but all of the concept plans include office space.
     
     
  #7127  
Old Posted May 19, 2017, 2:40 AM
Udon'tknow's Avatar
Udon'tknow Udon'tknow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 360
Fountain

Rehab on the fountain outside of NMS is coming along nicely.







credit: YQR stadium twitter
     
     
  #7128  
Old Posted May 19, 2017, 3:28 AM
aberrant aberrant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 246
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrutallyDishonest2 View Post
An office tower, maybe not, but all of the concept plans include office space.
Yes, absolutely. There seems to be a demand for small to mid-sized businesses that want something a little more unique/edgy than a typical dreary "head office" style tower, but still near amenities and clients.
     
     
  #7129  
Old Posted May 19, 2017, 4:40 AM
one_brick_at_a_time's Avatar
one_brick_at_a_time one_brick_at_a_time is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Regina/Toronto
Posts: 2,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan0myte View Post
So I walk through the Golden Mile mall multiple times per week and I have to say, the retail space they left available in there is completely useless. All three retail locations left after the Superstore renovation (1 large, 2 small) have no possibility of a tenant ever wanting to move into there. A retail operator would be better served opening their store in the basement of the SGI building as they would probably get more foot traffic there than they would in the Golden Mile. It's a complete dead zone during normal business hours. The only time it gets busy in there is at night when people visit the Rack, the Rainbow or the bowling alley. When they end up renovating the old Extra Foods, those locations will all be exterior-facing as well so that's not going to help the foot traffic in the mall section at all.

My thoughts: The large retail spot would work well for office space. Something like a call center or government office could use that effectively, with the benefit of the Rack and Superstore for lunch options for employees. The other two little spots... beats me. Fancy new washroom?

Anyways, that's just my rant of the day. Did the REIT that owns that mall not care about the mall side, they just wanted their big new Superstore and the rest was "Meh. Whatever."?
Maybe Rainbow Cinemas could expand to the North and maybe do a VIP Liquor Licensed Theatre.
     
     
  #7130  
Old Posted May 19, 2017, 1:29 PM
BrutallyDishonest2 BrutallyDishonest2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by aberrant View Post
Yes, absolutely. There seems to be a demand for small to mid-sized businesses that want something a little more unique/edgy than a typical dreary "head office" style tower, but still near amenities and clients.
I would disagree. Virtually nothing is happening in the office market and there is "cool" space available today nobody's in.
     
     
  #7131  
Old Posted May 20, 2017, 5:24 AM
StealthGirl's Avatar
StealthGirl StealthGirl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,280
Odd to see this posted to the city's crackbook page after 8pm on the Friday night of a long weekend, esp since they often state their page is not monitored after hours.

We’re exploring options for housing development and outdoor recreational facilities on the Regent Par 3 Golf Course site and we need your help.
Your input matters. We’re considering options and no decisions have been made. We’re seeking your feedback in response to a recommendation from the Recreation Master Plan 2010-2020 for redevelopment of the golf course site as a community recreation hub. We’re also seeking your feedback as part of direction provided by City Council.

You can give your feedback TWO ways:

1. By attending a workshop May 25 (bring your children too!)
- Advantage: Face-to-face discussions help you learn from your neighbours about shared ideas for possible change in your neighbourhood.
- We will have planned drawing activities for your children, so bring them along.

2. By filling out a feedback form available on Regina.ca/Planning May 26 – June 16
- Advantage: Convenient if you can’t attend the workshop and still want to share your ideas.
We expect the complete planning process for redevelopment will take one to two years. Regent Par 3 Golf Course is currently open and will remain open until redevelopment options are brought to City Council for consideration in 2018 and decisions are made.

Get involved and help shape our city!

Link: Regina.ca/Planning


https://www.facebook.com/CityRegina/?hc_ref=NEWSFEED&fref=nf
     
     
  #7132  
Old Posted May 23, 2017, 3:55 PM
StealthGirl's Avatar
StealthGirl StealthGirl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,280
Railyards concepts are coming....

Quote:
Originally Posted by LeaderPost
Ian Rea, the city’s chief financial officer, is hoping for “overflow crowds” when the draft recommended plan is shared at a public open house scheduled for 7 p.m. on May 30 in Meeting Room 2 at Queensbury Centre.

“We’re hoping to get lots of people out to share their views and provide us with a perspective … That doesn’t mean it’s the end of public engagement, but it means that we’re through this piece of the development,” Rea said. “We have many steps to go.”
http://leaderpost.com/news/local-news/city-plans-to-unveil-concept-plan-for-railyard-site
     
     
  #7133  
Old Posted May 23, 2017, 6:24 PM
Regina Boi Regina Boi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 468
Quote:
Originally Posted by StealthGirl View Post
So I wonder when we can realistically expect any work to begin?
     
     
  #7134  
Old Posted May 23, 2017, 7:08 PM
StealthGirl's Avatar
StealthGirl StealthGirl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by Regina Boi View Post
So I wonder when we can realistically expect any work to begin?
I'd expect it's still at least a year out if not two. Mosaic is supposed to come down within the next 12 months. There will be some expenses there. The city doesn't have the money to move on Taylor Field and the railyards at the same time, do they?
     
     
  #7135  
Old Posted May 23, 2017, 7:45 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by StealthGirl View Post
I'd expect it's still at least a year out if not two. Mosaic is supposed to come down within the next 12 months. There will be some expenses there. The city doesn't have the money to move on Taylor Field and the railyards at the same time, do they?
I would say a minimum of 3 years and probably more than 5.
     
     
  #7136  
Old Posted May 23, 2017, 11:08 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,009
Fanciful Regina skyline by Dana Rogoschewsky



http://www.artbydana.ca/apps/photos/photo?photoid=183416627
     
     
  #7137  
Old Posted May 23, 2017, 11:29 PM
BrutallyDishonest2 BrutallyDishonest2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by StealthGirl View Post
I'd expect it's still at least a year out if not two. Mosaic is supposed to come down within the next 12 months. There will be some expenses there. The city doesn't have the money to move on Taylor Field and the railyards at the same time, do they?
Well the city has already announced that nothing will be built at Taylor field for a decade. So they probably will do nothing.
     
     
  #7138  
Old Posted May 24, 2017, 6:25 PM
thefourthtower thefourthtower is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Rueannatta
Posts: 2,597
Regina set to host major LPGA tour event in 2018


Brian Fitzpatrick, Regina Leader-Post Brian Fitzpatrick, Regina Leader-Post
More from Brian Fitzpatrick, Regina Leader-Post

Published on: May 19, 2017 | Last Updated: May 19, 2017 5:30 PM CST
“I can’t imagine a bigger event for golf coming to our province,” said Greg Dukart, CEO of Wascana Country Club, as he indicated Regina will finally play host to the LPGA tour event it has long coveted.

“We’ve been working on it for close to three years,” Dukart said. “We are in the process of dotting the I’s and crossing the T’s with Golf Canada, insomuch that there’s an official press conference being called for Wednesday, June 14 at the Wascana Country Club.”

The seven-day Canadian Pacific Women’s Open is a highlight of the LPGA Tour, with the vast majority of the tour’s official money list normally competing. At present Brooke Henderson (22nd on the list) and Alena Sharp (32nd) are Canada’s top performers on the circuit.

This year’s event — one of two 2017 Canadian stops — is Aug. 21 at the Ottawa Hunt and Golf Club. That club’s third hosting of the event will see some of the world’s best golfers play 72 holes for an overall purse of $2.25 million USD.




“We’re delighted,” said Dukart, who chaired Regina’s bid process, which was undertaken last winter. He expressed his gratitude to partners such as Tourism Saskatchewan and the City of Regina.

“It’s been a great process to be involved in; it’s going to be great for our province and our city.”

“There was a bid committee formed, and we submitted a bid back in 2014 to host the 2016 event,” he added. “At the 11th hour, the 2016 event was moved to Calgary (but) things happen when you’re dealing with corporations putting in millions and millions of dollars, and you’re working on something as big as this.”

Speaking by phone Thursday, Terry Lenyk, communications manager with Golf Canada, hinted that Regina was being looked at favourably but stopped short of outright confirmation.

“Regina is being strongly considered as host for the 2018 CP Women’s Open,” Lenyk later said by email. “We’re currently in the final stages of our future venue selection process and will be ready to make an official announcement in mid-June.”

Though he said he would leave it to Golf Canada to provide more precise tournament details, Dukart said Friday the deal is all but closed.

“We stayed in contact with Golf Canada, and the bid was consistent, so we resubmitted our bid,” Dukart said of Regina’s determined response to that failed 2016 effort. “We never were in line for 2017, that wasn’t on our radar at all.”

Dukart said the first positive indication for 2018 came from Golf Canada in March, adding that the “final documents are close to being signed off.”

“My understanding is that the LPGA players love the country, love coming to Canada,” Dukart said.

“The event is broadcast to 200 million people around the world … we’re excited about it. All the partners are and certainly our club is. I know the city will be, and I know the province will be.”

[email protected]
     
     
  #7139  
Old Posted May 25, 2017, 5:22 PM
thefourthtower thefourthtower is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Rueannatta
Posts: 2,597
http://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/sas...cast-for-winnipeg-in-2017-624316264.html
Saskatoon and Regina on the Road to Recovery, While Solid Growth is Forecast for Winnipeg in 2017 ReginaLike Saskatoon, Regina's economy is benefiting from the slight improvement in oil prices. Real GDP is poised to increase by 1.5 per cent in 2017, the first expansion since 2014. Local manufacturing will benefit from the recovery in the province's resources sector, allowing it to register stronger growth of 2.2 per cent this year. A turnaround is also in sight for Regina's construction industry. Ongoing work on a $1.9 billion bypass for the Trans-Canada Highway will help offset weak residential activity and allow Regina's construction sector to eke out growth of 0.7 per cent this year, after shrinking by 2.2 per cent in 2016.

Fuelled by output gains in all eight services industries, Regina's services sector will see growth of 1.7 per cent this year. Finance, insurance and real estate output growth should perk up slightly this year as erosion halts in both the new home and resale markets, while the area's slight economic improvement will support gains in the transportation and warehousing industry. On the other hand, retail sales growth is expected to remain tepid for another year.
     
     
  #7140  
Old Posted May 27, 2017, 11:14 PM
J-Walker J-Walker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by wacko View Post
Maybe the city should just sit on the railyard land until the timing is appropriate for mixed residential/commercial towers. Instead, perhaps they should develop the Taylor Field land first. Surely there must be some demand for affordable medium-density housing, no?
This might not be a popular viewpoint, but you are probably right, there really is no need for the RRI project at this point in time. Unless there is currently a developer looking specifically for a large plot of land near the downtown (for something like a convention center or arena), this project would be a huge, unnecessary expense right now. The downtown / transition area has enough vacant land and underutilized lots (just look at the massive amount of gravel parking lots between 13th and 15th) to easily satisfy the City’s high-rise needs for the next two decades if not more. It seems an expensive waste to massively expand the infrastructure footprint of the downtown to facilitate development which could occur on already serviced lots in the existing downtown/transition area. Regina's downtown doesn't need more infrastructure, it needs to replace and improve the crumbling infrastructure it already has.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:02 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.