HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2601  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2017, 3:18 PM
MG922 MG922 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 164
Someone was asking about the new banana boat building in the restaurant thread.



     
     
  #2602  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2017, 4:31 PM
biguc's Avatar
biguc biguc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: pinkoland
Posts: 11,904
Not a very handsome building but the storefronts look good. It's exactly the kind of cheap mixed-use infill we should be seeing everywhere in this city. Notice how the back of the building offers direct access to the upstairs suites.
__________________
no
     
     
  #2603  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2017, 4:53 PM
Urban recluse Urban recluse is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4,797
That's f@cken disgusting.

Yeah, lets NOT see developments like this:

     
     
  #2604  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2017, 4:56 PM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,834
The lower half actually looks quite good, it's the barn on top that ruins it. Would it have been that difficult and expensive to use the same material on the whole building, or even just put a finishing touch at the top?

I wonder if some of the suites were taken in advance, as it's odd that one window up top is different.
     
     
  #2605  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2017, 5:56 PM
Hecate's Avatar
Hecate Hecate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 2,437
Meh... this design would be fine if it was in an industrial park, not for Osborne. I do agree the external access is nice!
     
     
  #2606  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2017, 6:06 PM
biguc's Avatar
biguc biguc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: pinkoland
Posts: 11,904
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hecate View Post
Meh... this design would be fine if it was in an industrial park, not for Osborne. I do agree the external access is nice!
And cheap! Like I said, this building doesn't look good, but it looks better than any strip mall in the city, and we'd be a much better city if people realized how affordably they could do mixed-use. We could honestly use 100 more of these in this city long before we could use 1 better looking iteration of this building.
__________________
no
     
     
  #2607  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2017, 7:11 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by biguc View Post
And cheap! Like I said, this building doesn't look good, but it looks better than any strip mall in the city, and we'd be a much better city if people realized how affordably they could do mixed-use. We could honestly use 100 more of these in this city long before we could use 1 better looking iteration of this building.
Agreed. No question it's a homely building, but the benefits of the built form outweighs any harm from the so-so appearance.

Apperance only gets you so far... there are plenty of ugly buildings in mind blowing urban environments, while there are also lots of nice, high quality, well finished strip malls in places like Grand Forks and Brandon.
     
     
  #2608  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2017, 8:27 PM
tree's Avatar
tree tree is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 194
Quote:
Originally Posted by MG922 View Post
Someone was asking about the new banana boat building in the restaurant thread.
Thanks! that was me. Yeah agree with most here that bottom is okay, top is disgusting - like the access for each unit and agree overall that more of these are at least a step in the right direction.

This was the image posted on the facebook event page and the one i suspected was incorrect - no idea what this is supposed to be then?

     
     
  #2609  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2017, 8:28 PM
tree's Avatar
tree tree is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban recluse View Post
That's f@cken disgusting.

Yeah, lets NOT see developments like this:
The image you posted - are you being sarcastic? because I think those look excellent. am I missing something?
     
     
  #2610  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2017, 8:34 PM
MG922 MG922 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 164
Quote:
Originally Posted by tree View Post
This was the image posted on the facebook event page and the one i suspected was incorrect - no idea what this is supposed to be then?
Could be wrong, but I think that was the original render for the replacement building. Obviously some details have changed since then
     
     
  #2611  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2017, 8:50 PM
tree's Avatar
tree tree is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 194
Quote:
Originally Posted by MG922 View Post
Could be wrong, but I think that was the original render for the replacement building. Obviously some details have changed since then
unfortunately they removed lots of the good from it
     
     
  #2612  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2017, 10:50 PM
Urban recluse Urban recluse is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by tree View Post
The image you posted - are you being sarcastic? because I think those look excellent. am I missing something?
Sarcastic yes. Developers and city leaders in Winnipeg are destined to remain insipid. Why do you think so many young professionals leave the city: just look around.
     
     
  #2613  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2017, 12:26 AM
Andy6's Avatar
Andy6 Andy6 is offline
Starring as himself
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto Yorkville
Posts: 9,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzg View Post
The lower half actually looks quite good, it's the barn on top that ruins it. Would it have been that difficult and expensive to use the same material on the whole building, or even just put a finishing touch at the top?

I wonder if some of the suites were taken in advance, as it's odd that one window up top is different.
I kind of like it. It could become a unique local style that would be homely, yet beloved.
__________________
crispy crunchy light and snappy
     
     
  #2614  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2017, 3:41 AM
Jeff's Avatar
Jeff Jeff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Winnipeg|MB
Posts: 2,324
from the back, it looks like it could be used as a fill-in on a movie set for a cheap motel along interstate 5!
__________________
instagram: @jeff_vernaus
     
     
  #2615  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2017, 4:38 AM
DancingDuck DancingDuck is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 370
I think it looks fine...almost like a modern day warehouse converted into mixed use. It'll be interesting to see what the signage looks like, that could make a huge difference
     
     
  #2616  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2017, 4:41 AM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 26,524
Quote:
Originally Posted by biguc View Post
And cheap! Like I said, this building doesn't look good, but it looks better than any strip mall in the city, and we'd be a much better city if people realized how affordably they could do mixed-use. We could honestly use 100 more of these in this city long before we could use 1 better looking iteration of this building.
agreed! we need more low rental retail if we can make it work for the developers cause why would u if ur not guna make healthy roi


also its an improvment over the decaying building that was there
     
     
  #2617  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2017, 4:42 AM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 26,524
Quote:
Originally Posted by tree View Post
Thanks! that was me. Yeah agree with most here that bottom is okay, top is disgusting - like the access for each unit and agree overall that more of these are at least a step in the right direction.

This was the image posted on the facebook event page and the one i suspected was incorrect - no idea what this is supposed to be then?

i wonder if its being built in phases?
     
     
  #2618  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2017, 12:35 PM
Urban recluse Urban recluse is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1ajs View Post
agreed! we need more low rental retail if we can make it work for the developers cause why would u if ur not guna make healthy roi


also its an improvment over the decaying building that was there
Ah yes, the new marketing campaign for Winnipeg: "its better than what was there."
     
     
  #2619  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2017, 2:04 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban recluse View Post
Ah yes, the new marketing campaign for Winnipeg: "its better than what was there."
Well, at least things are moving in a positive direction?

I can tell you that many global cities are filled with wholly unimpressive and unspectacular buildings... yet put them all together, and they add up to an incredible urban environment.


Osaka
Source:wikimedia.org
     
     
  #2620  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2017, 2:10 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,356
That's garbage. Bait and switch, again.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:03 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.