Quote:
Originally Posted by milomilo
I agree it is in theory safer, but I just don't see the big deal of not having one in places where it would be highly expensive to add.
|
It is safer--a lot safer--based on stats. Compromising safety because of costs should never be done because once you allow the government to get away with it in one situation they'll push to do it in others. The cost "excuse" is a major reason why certain sections of highway in B.C. have such horrible safety records. How many people have to die and/or be critically injured before action is taken?
Threaded Mode