Those new tall Ottawa towers are NOT downtown... they won't be part of the general skyline that we're used to seeing.
Depends on how you look at it. Argument is that Le Breton Flats will become an extension of downtown and the skyline. So not in the central core, or the "traditional" downtown, but still downtown.
We can compare this to Montreal, where le Vieux Montréal and rue St-Jaqcues (maybe even around Place Ville Marie) is considered the traditional downtown while the area around the Molson/Bell Centre is the "new" downtown, or an extension of the original downtown.
I think that Le Breton and the Bell Centre area comparison is a good one. While the expansion westward of the montreal skyline makes a strong impression from some angles, from other angles you can't notice the new towers. It all depends on where you look at it from.
Depends on how you look at it. Argument is that Le Breton Flats will become an extension of downtown and the skyline. So not in the central core, or the "traditional" downtown, but still downtown.
Just curious, what's the elevation change between downtown and Le Breton?
Wondering about the impact on the skyline with the Le Breton towers at a lower elevation.
Don't know how accurate, but this was posted on the 900 Albert thread. The 50, 55 and 59 storey towers will be at the western edge of Lebreton Flats. If you refer to the Rendez-Vous Le Breton massings I posted earlier, they are the tall triangular towers right outside the Senators proposal.
Montréal c'est plus gros et plus vieux, c'est eux qui copient. Mais probablement les 2 villes les plus identiques en Amérique du Nord. Montréal a 1,753M sur 365km², et Philadelphia a 1,567M sur 376km².
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish