Quote:
Originally Posted by StealthGirl
Emterra wants the glass in there because it makes the bins heavier. Part of their contract with the city pays them by weight. Saskatoon's recycling is run by Loraas who take plastic bags and wrapping paper (without the request to remove staples/tape). I think there needs to be a serious look at who provides recycling in Regina bc they aren't doing a good job. Anyone know how long the Emterra contract is?
|
Contract ends June 30, 2023, with options for two 1 year extensions (to 2024, and 2025)
Yes, their contract includes weight. But to say they make more if the recycling is heavier oversimplifies the story.
0-15,000Tonnes/yr = $114/tonne
15,001-20,000 = $93
20,001-25,000 = $86
25,001+ = $75
(rates vary based on contamination, but same principle)
So, they get paid less per tonne as the weight of collected material increases. If they're under 15,000tonnes, then yeah - they'd want to bulk up their weight to increase processing fees. But as their diversion increases, they'll have less incentive to collect heavier/less marketable items (such as glass).
(I realize I'm oversimplifying as well - but if glass has no marketable value to them, they don't want glass to be the item that pushes them from 20,000 to 20,001... they'd want easily marketable items to make up the majority of their weight, if they're getting paid less per tonne).
A lot of the stories we're hearing are garbage (pun intended) - other cities recycle materials that Regina & Emterra are claiming to be unrecyclable/of no marketable value. There need to be incentives in the agreement which encourage Emterra to seek out buyers & encourage them to send less to the Landfill
(presumably, the fact Emterra has to pay to send materials to the dump is a bit of a disincentive... but it can't the only nudge).
Wrapping paper with tape or staples on it is recyclable, it's just doesn't fetch the same price as other paper... which impacts Emterra's revenue
(75% of which they keep, 25% the City gets). So, I suspect Emterra's done the math & realized that it's simply cheaper for them to pay to send this stuff to the Landfill, than to find a buyer.
Similar story with glass, I bet. There's nothing inherently unrecyclable about glass (even if broken) - it simply nets less money than glass sorted by colour, grade, intact, etc. So, Emterra's probably done a cost-benefit & decided that paying to send it to the Landfill is better than marketing it.