HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #9041  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2016, 3:20 PM
p_xavier p_xavier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipv View Post
LOL

If REM is built by the agreed timelines, I will eat my socks. This is Montreal we are talking about - the city of corrupt construction companies and crumbling infrastructure. Ya, I totally see a massive transit project being built in 5 years... Sure, kinda like those Dorval interchanges under construction for a decade now?
Actually the new Champlain bridge, Turcot, the 720 tunnel covering and the Bonaventure demolition are all on time/budget. And most of them are billions/hundreds of millions projects.

Dorval interchange was due to the governance of the rail industry, the CN and CP refused to collaborate and the federal governement refused to force them. This is a different issue altogether and not linked to corruption.

The better way of knowing corruption is to look for corruption, Québec is well ahead of other provinces in that case.
     
     
  #9042  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2016, 3:36 PM
flipv's Avatar
flipv flipv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 727
Quote:
Originally Posted by d_jeffrey View Post
Actually the new Champlain bridge, Turcot, the 720 tunnel covering and the Bonaventure demolition are all on time/budget. And most of them are billions/hundreds of millions projects.

Dorval interchange was due to the governance of the rail industry, the CN and CP refused to collaborate and the federal governement refused to force them. This is a different issue altogether and not linked to corruption.

The better way of knowing corruption is to look for corruption, Québec is well ahead of other provinces in that case.
None compare to the scope of REM.

If you really think a project with so much underground complexity will be delivered in about 5 years, you're smoking something potent and I may ask you for a hit.

The private sector can accelerate certain pieces, but a 5 year delivery of a massive, complex transit line with significant underground portions is living in dream land. Reality will hit soon enough and we'll start seeing some scope creep/timeline slip. This isn't China. You don't have access to a limitless pool of cheap resources and no environmental assessments. Right now, REM is nothing more than lines on a map - the complex engineering and design hasn't even really started yet.
     
     
  #9043  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2016, 3:45 PM
p_xavier p_xavier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipv View Post
None compare to the scope of REM.

If you really think a project with so much underground complexity will be delivered in about 5 years, you're smoking something potent and I may ask you for a hit.

The private sector can accelerate certain pieces, but a 5 year delivery of a massive, complex transit line with significant underground portions is living in dream land. Reality will hit soon enough and we'll start seeing some scope creep/timeline slip. This isn't China. You don't have access to a limitless pool of cheap resources and no environmental assessments. Right now, REM is nothing more than lines on a map - the complex engineering and design hasn't even really started yet.
The CDPQ delivered in 4 years for Vancouver and I'm confident that they will in Montreal. The focus is to deliver one of the three lines by December 2020. The Environmental Assessment was sped up and it concludes this December.
     
     
  #9044  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2016, 4:02 PM
flipv's Avatar
flipv flipv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 727
Quote:
Originally Posted by d_jeffrey View Post
The CDPQ delivered in 4 years for Vancouver and I'm confident that they will in Montreal. The focus is to deliver one of the three lines by December 2020. The Environmental Assessment was sped up and it concludes this December.
Seriously? That is the definition of living in dream land.
     
     
  #9045  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2016, 4:30 PM
p_xavier p_xavier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipv View Post
Seriously? That is the definition of living in dream land.
Yes and this project is bring presented by the mayor on how Montreal is becoming better at major prijects so failure is not an option for them.
     
     
  #9046  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2016, 4:36 PM
flipv's Avatar
flipv flipv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 727
Quote:
Originally Posted by d_jeffrey View Post
Yes and this project is bring presented by the mayor on how Montreal is becoming better at major prijects so failure is not an option for them.
As I said, I will eat my socks if this project is delivered in 4 years. We're not talking about a largely elevated line in suburban Vancouver, but a major transit line in dense Montreal with underground components. I don't see how this is doable in that timeframe. When are the next municipal/provincial elections? That might be the answer.
     
     
  #9047  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2016, 4:41 PM
p_xavier p_xavier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipv View Post
As I said, I will eat my socks if this project is delivered in 4 years. We're not talking about a largely elevated line in suburban Vancouver, but a major transit line in dense Montreal with underground components. I don't see how this is doable in that timeframe. When are the next municipal/provincial elections? That might be the answer.
The major tunnel downtown is already built. The other tunnels are in an old dump, under a canal and at the airport. The stations at these places might be posing engineering difficulties but there have been results and optimized plans. The tunnels themselves are not at all engineering difficulties.
     
     
  #9048  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2016, 4:43 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,743
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipv View Post
As I said, I will eat my socks if this project is delivered in 4 years. We're not talking about a largely elevated line in suburban Vancouver, but a major transit line in dense Montreal with underground components. I don't see how this is doable in that timeframe. When are the next municipal/provincial elections? That might be the answer.
When it opens in 2020, you must post a link to a video of you removing your shoes and each sock one at a time and eating them.
     
     
  #9049  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2016, 4:47 PM
flipv's Avatar
flipv flipv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 727
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
When it opens in 2020, you must post a link to a video of you removing your shoes and each sock one at a time and eating them.
And if it doesn't? What do I get?
     
     
  #9050  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2016, 4:53 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,743
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipv View Post
And if it doesn't? What do I get?
The satisfaction you are right, and knowing that you do not have to taste what foot sweat is.
     
     
  #9051  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2016, 4:54 PM
flipv's Avatar
flipv flipv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 727
Quote:
Originally Posted by d_jeffrey View Post
The major unnel downtown is already built. The other tunnels are in an old dump, under a canal and at the airport. The stations at these places might be posing engineering difficulties but there have been results and optimized plans. The tunnels themselves are not at all engineering difficulties.
You are being incredibly optimistic for a Canadian. There is absolutely no chance REM will open by 2020. You can't even build underground stations in 4 years if you started tomorrow.
     
     
  #9052  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2016, 4:54 PM
flipv's Avatar
flipv flipv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 727
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
The satisfaction you are right, and knowing that you do not have to taste what foot sweat is.
What about folks with foot fetishes?
     
     
  #9053  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2016, 4:58 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,743
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipv View Post
What about folks with foot fetishes?
If he has one, then he may be hoping for it to be completed on time.
     
     
  #9054  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2016, 5:11 PM
p_xavier p_xavier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipv View Post
You are being incredibly optimistic for a Canadian. There is absolutely no chance REM will open by 2020. You can't even build underground stations in 4 years if you started tomorrow.
Montreal built the Laval metro extension in that timeline, and yes, that included 4 stations.
     
     
  #9055  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2016, 5:26 PM
nephersir7 nephersir7 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Montreal
Posts: 162
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipv View Post
None compare to the scope of REM.
Actually, the new Champlain Bridge and the Turcot projects both have a comparable scope and budget. And the Champlain Bridge project has a timeline that is every bit as ambitious as the REM's.

Coupled together (they physically are), these projects are way more complex than the REM.

Quote:
Originally Posted by flipv View Post
This isn't China. You don't have access to a limitless pool of cheap resources and no environmental assessments. Right now, REM is nothing more than lines on a map - the complex engineering and design hasn't even really started yet.
That's not true. Environmental assesments are already a done thing. There have been hundreds of people working full-time on the project and its components since 2013. The complex engineering and design has already been underway for quite some time.

Starting this month, multiple large international consortia are dedicating huge amounts of resources to piece together the remaining engineering challenges by june 2017. That includes the companies who are currently working on the Champlain Bridge project.

I have no doubt all branches will be operational by the end of 2021
     
     
  #9056  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2016, 5:34 PM
flipv's Avatar
flipv flipv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 727
Quote:
Originally Posted by nephersir7 View Post
Actually, the new Champlain Bridge and the Turcot projects both have a comparable scope and budget. And the Champlain Bridge project has a timeline that is every bit as ambitious as the REM's.

Coupled together (they physically are), these projects are way more complex than the REM.



That's not true. Environmental assesments are already a done thing. There have been hundreds of people working full-time on the project and its components since 2013. The complex engineering and design has already been underway for quite some time.

Starting this month, multiple large international consortia are dedicating huge amounts of resources to piece together the remaining engineering challenges by june 2017. That includes the companies who are currently working on the Champlain Bridge project.

I have no doubt all branches will be operational by the end of 2021
The Champlain Bridge is funded by the GoC because it is a vital economic link.

Turcot links the bridge to the rest of the network and was falling over.

REM does not have the same business case. Anyway, we can agree to disagree, but this myopic optimism is a bit amusing, especially from the city that takes a decade to build a simple interchange.
     
     
  #9057  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2016, 5:38 PM
p_xavier p_xavier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipv View Post
The Champlain Bridge is funded by the GoC because it is a vital economic link.

Turcot links the bridge to the rest of the network and was falling over.

REM does not have the same business case. Anyway, we can agree to disagree, but this myopic optimism is a bit amusing, especially from the city that takes a decade to build a simple interchange.
Or I guess the engineers that worked for that interchange are now working in Toronto? How is that subway construction coming, and that crumbling Gardiner?
     
     
  #9058  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2016, 5:40 PM
flipv's Avatar
flipv flipv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 727
Quote:
Originally Posted by d_jeffrey View Post
Or I guess the engineers that worked for that interchange are now working in Toronto? How is that subway construction coming, and that crumbling Gardiner?
That crumbling Gardiner stood for 50 years before crumbling. Your interchanges don't make it past 20.
     
     
  #9059  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2016, 5:43 PM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 10,633
Here is the new Eglington Crosstown train leaving Thunder Bay some time last week on it's way for testing near Kingston. Photo from cbc.ca

I wonder if they chose grey to give it more of a subway look. Maybe it was done so our former mayor wouldn't confuse them with streetcars.

__________________
"Less is more" – Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
     
     
  #9060  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2016, 5:53 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,743
Quote:
Originally Posted by TorontoDrew View Post
Here is the new Eglington Crosstown train leaving Thunder Bay some time last week on it's way for testing near Kingston. Photo from cbc.ca

I wonder if they chose grey to give it more of a subway look. Maybe it was done so our former mayor wouldn't confuse them with streetcars.

Maybe it has yet to be painted.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:26 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.