Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen
Jebby, could I ask you to elaborate on that remark? What precisely do you mean? It interests me. Thanks a lot, if you have time to explain. 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jebby
Lighting features in Vancouver don't tend to last very long after the outcries about light pollution that floor City Hall.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by retro_orange
I think a better argument is that because of how poorly the lighting feature was maintained on the WF building after it's renovation predicates how this feature will age. Also considering how much maintenance the one on the condo tower will require, it's future seems quite uncertain. It seems that certain individual panels are more problematic than others, if over time they become more problematic and more start to fail they may just abandon the whole thing. as soon as individual diodes start to go you have to replace the entire lighting bar which is actually quite wasteful and looks bad as they start to fail and get dim. Also it seems to have a computer system that controls the lighting; subject to failure aswell.
If anyone is ever in front of the Crossroads building at Broadway and Cambie, you can see at the entrance to the office block that many of the LEDs in the strips next to the doors are burnt out but you can't replace the individual diodes, it looks silly. Just put in a neon tube and be done with high maintenance technology.
|
Geezuz Iced Krijst !!!

If people want to live downtown, then they have to learn to live downtown!!!! Elementary as that may sound, you can't have a condo downtown with a white picket fence, apple trees, and a backyard fish pond**** If people want calm, peace, quiet, and to avoid the lights and noise of downtown,
then they have no business buying there, and expecting the rest of the world to adjust to their whims. (Jameson House, anyone?) * Go out to the suburbs or the country, and let the city get on with being a city. IMHO. Thank you.