HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1321  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2016, 10:06 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,750
The view cone from 12th Ave. limits heights to the height of the existing Crossroads complex.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1322  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2016, 10:11 PM
GlassCity's Avatar
GlassCity GlassCity is offline
Rational urbanist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 5,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
The view cone from 12th Ave. limits heights to the height of the existing Crossroads complex.
Right, I always forget about those. Ironic how they prevent densification in the places that are most suitable to it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1323  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2016, 10:54 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlassCity View Post
Right, I always forget about those. Ironic how they prevent densification in the places that are most suitable to it.
Vancouver is just one huge irony.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1324  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2016, 11:00 PM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
Quote:
Originally Posted by VancouverOfTheFuture View Post
well then go anywhere else in the world. you can afford a 2nd place in Vancouver's Yaletown. tough luck. Vancouver can't just cater to foreigners, that is what has created problems in the first place.
Seriously. Boo hoo, can't use Yaletown condo as our closet. It's exactly the kind of situation we're trying to end.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1325  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2016, 11:49 PM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
*l* you guys know that a lot of these units were only built because of purchasers like that. Without those purchasers there would'nt have been the demand and developers would not of provided the supply. There are more Canadians that own units in foreign countries then the other way around. Lots on the east coast have places in Florida, lots of Canadians with places in Arizona, Palm springs, recreation properties just across the border, homes in Mexico. A lot of first generation families still have their homes in their home country. We just like to think of complicated half thought out solutions to our problems.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1326  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2016, 11:58 PM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,970
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
*l* you guys know that a lot of these units were only built because of purchasers like that. Without those purchasers there would'nt have been the demand and developers would not of provided the supply. There are more Canadians that own units in foreign countries then the other way around. Lots on the east coast have places in Florida, lots of Canadians with places in Arizona, Palm springs, recreation properties just across the border, homes in Mexico. A lot of first generation families still have their homes in their home country. We just like to think of complicated half thought out solutions to our problems.
<shrug> Then maybe they shouldn't have been built. A lot of neighbourhoods are being told to accept higher density because it is necessary to keep prices down, but if it's really just to provide more second homes for foreigners, why should they be forced to accept it?

There is a big difference between communities like Palm Springs, Scottsdale whose raison d'être is to cater to tourists and Vancouver.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1327  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2016, 12:41 AM
Tommyrey Tommyrey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 35
Non-residents are already paying extra property taxes. Why can't the city be satisfied with that? Taxes on our unit are $275.16 with a primary residence grant and $845.16 with no primary residence grant each six months. So our taxes are already 3 times higher than those of a local resident. And thanks jlousa for pointing out that people have vacation homes all over the world and without tourists you wouldn't have the restaurants and amenities you do have.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1328  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2016, 2:21 AM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is offline
be nice to the crackheads
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 12,739
Terrible news about Bing Thom. Damn. RIP.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1329  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2016, 2:39 AM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommyrey View Post
Non-residents are already paying extra property taxes. Why can't the city be satisfied with that? Taxes on our unit are $275.16 with a primary residence grant and $845.16 with no primary residence grant each six months. So our taxes are already 3 times higher than those of a local resident. And thanks jlousa for pointing out that people have vacation homes all over the world and without tourists you wouldn't have the restaurants and amenities you do have.

Ignore the haters. They mistakenly think you're the only thing between them and affording that house in the west side
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1330  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2016, 2:45 AM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
<shrug> Then maybe they shouldn't have been built. A lot of neighbourhoods are being told to accept higher density because it is necessary to keep prices down, but if it's really just to provide more second homes for foreigners, why should they be forced to accept it?

There is a big difference between communities like Palm Springs, Scottsdale whose raison d'être is to cater to tourists and Vancouver.
Exactly. I couldn't care less what other cities accept, don't care if Yaletown remained industrial for a decade longer due to lack of condo demand. We are not in a better place for having insufficient regulation and politicians who sold us out.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dleung View Post
Ignore the haters. They mistakenly think you're the only thing between them and affording that house in the west side
You're mistaking caring for people as jealousy. My situation is taken care of, trust me. Doesn't mean I want our city to be a Cayman Islands type situation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1331  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2016, 3:20 AM
cornholio cornholio is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommyrey View Post
Non-residents are already paying extra property taxes. Why can't the city be satisfied with that? Taxes on our unit are $275.16 with a primary residence grant and $845.16 with no primary residence grant each six months. So our taxes are already 3 times higher than those of a local resident. And thanks jlousa for pointing out that people have vacation homes all over the world and without tourists you wouldn't have the restaurants and amenities you do have.
a) The tax is being brought in to offset the cost inflicted on the city by such practices. No one is telling anyone to sell, they are just saying to pay the fair share.

b) The options are to pay, or to sell. Everyone ultimately has to make that choice many times through out their life. The dynamics have changed and as such you need to re evaluate your empty condo and figure out if it is worth keeping or selling. Maybe a hotel 8 times a year is cheaper? I don't know. That's a question for you to answer.

Depending on where in the states you are living chances are your property taxes there are significantly higher. The taxes you claim to pay are rather low. For what its worth. I mean what is the property tax rate in say San Francisco again?

Also I don't see anything wrong with what you are doing, so long as you pay what is determined as fair taxes for the situation. I would do the same I I had money to burn.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1332  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2016, 8:02 AM
Prometheus's Avatar
Prometheus Prometheus is offline
Reason and Freedom
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 4,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by cornholio View Post

No one is telling anyone to sell, they are just saying to pay the fair share.
Fair share? The person pays far more city taxes while using far less city amenities/services than a full-time resident. Thus, he clearly pays more than his fair share. Indeed, your use of city amenities/services is being subsidized by his overpayments.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1333  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2016, 3:20 PM
Graham_Yvr's Avatar
Graham_Yvr Graham_Yvr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 270
This topic has been hijacked. No rumours here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1334  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2016, 4:06 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
<shrug> Then maybe they shouldn't have been built. A lot of neighbourhoods are being told to accept higher density because it is necessary to keep prices down, but if it's really just to provide more second homes for foreigners, why should they be forced to accept it?

There is a big difference between communities like Palm Springs, Scottsdale whose raison d'être is to cater to tourists and Vancouver.
Haven't you heard that the province earned a whopping amount of revenue from property transfer taxes, among others? How come you never commented on that?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinion View Post
Exactly. I couldn't care less what other cities accept, don't care if Yaletown remained industrial for a decade longer due to lack of condo demand. We are not in a better place for having insufficient regulation and politicians who sold us out.

You're mistaking caring for people as jealousy. My situation is taken care of, trust me. Doesn't mean I want our city to be a Cayman Islands type situation.
You like backwater affordability like what Vancouver used to be like before the 80s? No high-rise glass condos, just wood-frame houses from the 30s to the 70s? Well, lots of small cities and towns in BC offer that. Let one city, Vancouver, catch up with the rest of the world and move forward. You like all the amenities and modern changes that were brought in by foreign money and yet you guys hate the cultural changes associated with that. Well, sorry my friend you can't have the cake and eat it too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1335  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2016, 4:08 PM
DesignerBunny DesignerBunny is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 38
Tmi
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1336  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2016, 5:15 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlassCity View Post
I would think Cambie and Broadway, if not Commercial-Broadway, since it will have two rapid transit lines intersecting, and City Hall is right there too.
Yes, of course. CAMBIE & Broadway. Particularly with the Canada Line. Can't wait for Broadway west to densify !!!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1337  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2016, 6:12 PM
djmk's Avatar
djmk djmk is offline
victory in near
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 1,810
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommyrey View Post
I haven't seen anything on this site about the proposed Empty House tax. As the owner of a condo in Yaletown that we use 6-8 times a year as a vacation home from our permanent residence in the States, I think it is a terrible idea to penalize us when everywhere else in the world we would be welcomed. We are already paying higher taxes than residents because it is not our primary residence, so how can they justify another tax? We don't want to rent it because it is filled with our clothes and furniture. If we wanted to own rental property we would do so close to home. Check out this link for more information http://vancouver.ca/people-programs/empty-homes.aspx
The City has not defined what "vacant" means and you may end up not falling in that category. I don't think vacation homes will be considered vacant if they are used. But then again, who knows what will happen.
__________________
i have no idea what's going on
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1338  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2016, 6:13 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,158
Great rumours guys

We have a thread for this kind of discussion, let's use it:
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=193748&page=5
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1339  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2016, 6:15 PM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
You like all the amenities and modern changes that were brought in by foreign money and yet you guys hate the cultural changes associated with that. Well, sorry my friend you can't have the cake and eat it too.
Nothing is significantly better for me now in Vancouver than it was in the 90s. The negatives far outweigh the positives. I can't sell my condo and upgrade. I can't have kids (don't want to, but don't have the option). I can't even get off the north shore after 3pm anymore. I can't talk to strangers without them assuming I want to 🞵🞵🞵🞵 them or at very least scam them. This city is fucked, economically and culturally, and people who didn't live here decades ago shouldn't assume it is better now.

edit: whoops was typing when that last post came in, this will be my last one on the subject.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1340  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2016, 8:54 PM
Tetsuo Tetsuo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,382
Got a big rumour scoop here:

Heard Trofirhen is planning a visit home !
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:26 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.