Quote:
Originally Posted by Future Mayor
You made my point, the Midvale Road Home is a much better experience, because it is a stand along shelter, it is not surrounded by other shelters. Once again, it is the men's shelter and the congregating of the homeless in the neighborhood that results in the crime problem. Removing the cancerous cells in the neighborhood (mens shelter) the non cancerous (Road Home) can function as it is intended to.
Just because you "Walked by" the Road Home and didn't see families doesn't mean it's not a family shelter. The majority of those that actually stay there work and the children attend school, so of course they are not going to just be hanging out outside of the building. The Road Home is a true transitional facility. If I recall correctly the average stay for a family at The Road Home is less than 3 weeks, they transition them into traditional housing, and 90% of those that had a stay at The Road Home don't return, because they have successfully transitioned to permanent housing. So you are more than happy to help those that fell on hard times and are trying to get back on their feet, yet you insist that the shelter that is successfully accomplishing that HAS TO GO!
|
Future, I see your point on this but I wanted to point out a few things to clarify. The downtown Road Home is a mixed shelter, unlike their Midvale facility. Men, women, families, addicts. Its main problems are that the Men's dorm is right next door and their facility itself is terribly funded, really gross, insecure and unsafe and needs to be completely remodeled to achieve its goals. I know this all too well as I have a family member floating around in the Rio Grande cesspit and familiar withe the typical homeless movements and options.
I am fine with the RH staying there but it need to be completely overhauled from a physical and administrative standpoint if it does stay there. The overall status quo for all of the facilities needs to be either demolished, moved or fully renovated. Nothing can stay the same.