State crime statistics are pretty irrelevant and really don't mean much, especially to people who live in high-crime areas of the state.
This is why city statistics carry more weight, since it allows for a bigger, more detailed picture of areas most impacted by crime.
Earlier this year, the FBI released its most violent crime cities in each state. Salt Lake City was listed for Utah with a violent crime rate of 38.2 and 28th nationally. Since Pueblo, Colorado, is listed, and not Denver, at 26th, I can only assume SLC's violent crime rate is higher than Denver's. Tucson was listed for Arizona at 31st, so, again, I can assume it's higher than Phoenix (and Tucson) - and it continues for Seattle (Tacoma for Washington, at 29th), Louisville, KY, Portland (Eugene, at 40th), Boise (42nd) - but still better than a lot of other cities.
http://fox2now.com/2016/02/09/fbi-ranks-st-louis-top-us-city-for-violent-crime-in-2015/
Even so, at the city level, Utah doesn't fair as well. What's interesting to me is that SLC continues to be plagued by higher violent crime than the national average. It's something that has followed the city, really, since the 1970s, and I can't explain it. It's not because we have a high minority population (Denver is much more diverse and lower) or a homeless population (Seattle and Portland beat us there) and it isn't because we're some rundown, down on our luck rust belt city, either...yet here we are.
It's very unusual. On paper, Salt Lake should be a lot like Portland and Seattle and even Denver. But it's worse, or was through much of 2015, than those cities - plus Phoenix...and closer to New Orleans in terms of violent crime than Louisville, which is considered much safer.
I guess it's possible that some of it is due to the city's small borders. I know it's listed as per 100,000 residents, but much of Salt Lake is urban compared to huge stretches of other cities that encompass a great deal of suburbia. Louisville consolidated with its county about 15 years ago or so, which means the city is now spread throughout wealthier, less crime-filled suburbs.
My guess is that's probably it. Denver is its own city and county, too, so, I'm sure there's a lot of affluent suburbs within the city that skews the overall results.
I can't find county statistics but I'd wager they're better than SLC's statistics on its own.
Still...interesting how perception is not always reality. I'd wager the perception of Salt Lake beyond our borders is that of a boring, small religious town with no crime, a homogeneous population and clean streets.
I don't think that's true at all.