HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Business & the Economy


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1381  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2016, 3:08 AM
retro_orange retro_orange is offline
retro_orange
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
Better clarify whether it's Jebby or cornholio you're calling an out-of-touch elitist.
I'm on cornholios side. I'm fine with anyone of any nationality coming to Canada, as long as you live respectably and help maintain the quality of life and not suck it dry before taking your money to another country to do the same. I personally have been in a long term relationship with a guy from Mexico who came to Canada for a better life.
     
     
  #1382  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2016, 3:56 AM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by retro_orange View Post
I'm on cornholios side. I'm fine with anyone of any nationality coming to Canada, as long as you live respectably and help maintain the quality of life and not suck it dry before taking your money to another country to do the same. I personally have been in a long term relationship with a guy from Mexico who came to Canada for a better life.
Oh, so now I've sucked Canada dry and taken my money to Mexico to do the same?
     
     
  #1383  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2016, 1:48 PM
Millennium2002 Millennium2002 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,742
A thought. They set this tax to encompass the whole GVRD. Isn't that perhaps too broad and diverse of a market? e.g. the value of a Vancouver house or apartment is most likely way greater than something in Surrey and Langley - places that actually have room to grow and can use an uptick of population to boost city funding and services.

I could also go smaller scale and compare between neighbourhoods (e.g. Yaletown vs Chinatown / Strathcona / Downtown Eastside) or even different types of housing (e.g. apartments vs townhouses vs houses vs mansions), but I'm not sure if the tax code is able to handle such cases...
     
     
  #1384  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2016, 7:54 PM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jebby View Post
No, I was not born in Canada and yes my parents got permanent residence through the investor program. I guess that makes us evil, then. We probably only brought laundered dirty drug money with us, because we're foreigners.


Well, my dad's first business in Canada was a salmon farm that employed 40-odd people directly. I guess that didn't benefit Canada, though. He sold that and paid quite a bit in taxes.

Then he had a tech sector company that employed almost 100 people at it's peak. I guess that didn't benefit Canada, either. When he sold that he also paid quite a bit in taxes, which seems to be the measure here of how much you contribute to Canada.

The various mining companies he has created based in Vancouver and easily directly employed over 1000 people over the years haven't been of any benefit, either.

The thousands of hours and hundreds of thousands of dollars we've donated to local charities over the years obviously never benefited anyone, right? The scholarships we've supported never benefited anyone in need either, right?


Oh, so we're uneducated and not hardworking?

I mean, my grandpa had a doctorate from Stanford, my dad has a law degree and an MBA, my mom has her undergrad, I have a master's degree, my brother is getting his PhD in Economics...but totally uneducated family we are.

And none of us ever worked hard for anything in life. I mean, if you say so it must be true...


Ok, so another accusation. We came to Canada to use the serviced, got citizenship, and then just left.

Let's start with the last part. Living continuously in Canada for 15 years = getting citizenship and then leaving? We never came to Canada for citizenship with the intention of leaving, but keep assuming you know my family.

Coming to use the services? Let's see:

Public school? Nope, my brother and I did our entire schooling at private schools.
Healthcare? We always had a US health insurance plan, which is what we used when my dad had cancer and my mom needed her gallbladder removed.

We payed way more into the system than we took out. We were paying over $15,000 in property taxes alone when we left Vancouver. We still pay property taxes on our remaining properties, in addition to income taxes on rent. But yeah, we just came for the services and citizenship...
Your family certainly seems to have a wide and varied business experience in Canada over such a short time. It's great that they created businesses which are hopefully still thriving. After all that, why all leave for Mexico City which can hardly offer the same quality of life?

Also, on a personal note I'm curious why forego the care at the care at the BC Cancer Agency (generally acknowledged as excellent) in favour of US healthcare, especially when it had been "paid for" through taxes?
     
     
  #1385  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2016, 1:53 PM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Your family certainly seems to have a wide and varied business experience in Canada over such a short time. It's great that they created businesses which are hopefully still thriving.
The salmon farm, AFAIK, is still up and running. My dad sold his share in the mid-90s.

The tech company was sold to a bigger company during the dot com boom, pretty sure they went under like most tech companies of the era. It's sad, but that's what happens.

The mining companies my dad has been involved with are mostly still active. Some have been sold to bigger mining companies. He's still involved in that sector despite not living permanently in Vancouver anymore.

Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
After all that, why all leave for Mexico City which can hardly offer the same quality of life?
I'm living back here in Mexico City because I got a fantastic job offer from a Spanish company. I honestly never thought I'd move back here (which really is living here for the first time for me, since I left when I was 1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Also, on a personal note I'm curious why forego the care at the care at the BC Cancer Agency (generally acknowledged as excellent) in favour of US healthcare, especially when it had been "paid for" through taxes?
The US has the best quality healthcare in the world. The US's cancer survival rates are higher than Canada's (and Europe's as well). That along with the quality of care, access to specialists, drugs, and equipment...It was an easy choice, despite the high cost.
__________________
In the heart of a busy metropolis skyscrapers are a vivid reminder of the constant yearning of the human spirit to rise to God
     
     
  #1386  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2016, 7:56 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jebby View Post
The US has the best quality healthcare in the world. The US's cancer survival rates are higher than Canada's (and Europe's as well). That along with the quality of care, access to specialists, drugs, and equipment...It was an easy choice, despite the high cost.
Or maybe there are less people contracting cancer in Canada.

By the way, life expectancy in Canada was ranked 18 (2015)

U.S. was ranked 43: Maybe the best quality healthcare but only for the super rich. You are lucky to be able to afford it. Canada definitely has better health care for the majority of its residents.

http://www.infoplease.com/world/statistics/life-expectancy-country.html
     
     
  #1387  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2016, 9:17 PM
twoNeurons twoNeurons is offline
loafing in lotusland
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lotusland
Posts: 6,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
Or maybe there are less people contracting cancer in Canada.

By the way, life expectancy in Canada was ranked 18 (2015)

U.S. was ranked 43: Maybe the best quality healthcare but only for the super rich. You are lucky to be able to afford it. Canada definitely has better health care for the majority of its residents.

http://www.infoplease.com/world/statistics/life-expectancy-country.html
You can't correlate life expectancy with health care systems. It doesn't really work that way. There are a WIDE variety of societal, nutritional, cultural, and other things that affect life expectancy.

A friend of mine did her nurse degree and got offered a job in the USA. She said, of Canada's medical system, that she feels much safer in a US hospital. She's filipino, and a very balanced person.

She mentioned that USA systems are much more advanced and their procedures are better, overall. People are more careful and the quality of care is considerably higher. She also states that medicare is fairly even for US residents... while care in general is more expensive, it's not just for the super rich there. She said there may be a class of lower-middle-class that suffer more as they're not poor enough to get the government to pay, but not middle-class enough to be able to pay for it themselves... but overall, people of all income levels get similar treatment.

Canadians often feel that their "free" medical system is sacrosanct, but the truth is that it leads to awful wait times, inefficiencies, abuses, and poor service.

Japan has, perhaps, one of the most balanced and efficient systems in the world ( It's Japan are we surprised that it's efficient ). The system has its warts, but it's a hybrid co-pay system. For most treatments, you are required to pay 30% for some procedures ( and I believe 20% for some others ) and the government sets the cost of most treatments. It also covers dental, which is nice. This keeps the system affordable and efficient, without being abused or wasteful. When people get something for free, everyone stops caring. Doctors stop caring about giving the best treatment, because they're not dealing with paying customers. People have lower expectations of doctors and don't hold them to a higher standard because it's not really perceived as coming out of their pockets directly. People have low expectations of free stuff.

I'll give you one example:

A few years ago my father-in-law ( Canadian Permanent Resident, Japanese citizen ) had to get eye surgery. He opted to fly to Japan... I think he'd still be on the wait list for a specialist here. There were two options.

We'll call them the "GOLD" option and the "SILVER" option.

The doctors explained that the "GOLD" option is the more permanent solution, and a better ( more expensive ) procedure, but given his age, the "SILVER" option is all he will probably need in his life.

I think the difference in cost ( to him ) was something like $1000 vs. $3000.

They gave him the choice.

In the USA, it's likely both of those procedures would have been far more costly, and the choice would likely have been dictated by:
  1. What your insurance company will cover
  2. How much money you have over what your insurance covers

YOU STILL GET MORE CHOICE

In Canada, you would NOT be given a choice. The doctor would choose for you whatever is most efficient for the system based on what they think you need. And sure, they're the professional, but it takes control of your OWN health out of your hands. You can't even offer to pay the difference in Canada as that would show up the failures in the system.

If you are forced to pay a nominal fee for medical procedures, then you will definitely hold a medical practitioner to a higher standard. If a GP consistently is a jerk and doesn't treat his clients well, no way anyone is going to pay $20 to get him to diagnose a nagging cough. And you will find a GP will go a little further to really diagnose the problem. In addition, fewer people will show up to the emergency room to diagnose a cold. When you attach a VALUE to something, quality usually goes up and abuse goes down.

Canadians need to GET OVER the idea that user fees are bad for your health. It's quite the opposite. The problem is that ANY changes in fee structure in Canada leads Canadians to think that their system is becoming Americanized, and that scares people to death.

And what about the people in poverty? Easy-peasy. Do the same thing that we do for MSP in BC. Tie it to income. If you don't have the money to pay, we got your back.

Back to my father-in-law... He chose the SILVER level.
     
     
  #1388  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2016, 9:28 PM
twoNeurons twoNeurons is offline
loafing in lotusland
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lotusland
Posts: 6,107
JUST ONE MORE THING. Just so you don't think I'm hating on the Canadian system. The Canadian system has GREAT Emergency care.

Car accident, sudden heart attack, Emergency C-Section, severed limbs...

Fantastic, worry-free, no thoughts to how much it's going to cost. I'm not suggesting that these are bad.

I had an accident a few years ago, and within hours, I had a CAT Scan and was scheduled for an MRI and I even got a ride in an ambulance. Fortunately, I was fine... just a fractured rib.

But for either chronic problems, or elective surgical issues or long-term sicknesses, it's slow and all about the queue.

It's great for emergency care or healthy young people who have time on their side.
     
     
  #1389  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2016, 9:52 PM
Bcasey25raptor's Avatar
Bcasey25raptor Bcasey25raptor is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Vancouver Suburbs
Posts: 2,868
Canada's healthcare system is garbage, as someone who's been relying on it for various problems, it's horribly slow and inadequate.

Probably the worst healthcare system in the developed world by far.
__________________
River District Big Government progressive
~ Just Watch me
- Pierre Elliot Trudeau
     
     
  #1390  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2016, 10:32 PM
Caliplanner1 Caliplanner1 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 692
Quote:
Originally Posted by twoNeurons View Post
You can't correlate life expectancy with health care systems. It doesn't really work that way. There are a WIDE variety of societal, nutritional, cultural, and other things that affect life expectancy.

A friend of mine did her nurse degree and got offered a job in the USA. She said, of Canada's medical system, that she feels much safer in a US hospital. She's filipino, and a very balanced person.

She mentioned that USA systems are much more advanced and their procedures are better, overall. People are more careful and the quality of care is considerably higher. She also states that medicare is fairly even for US residents... while care in general is more expensive, it's not just for the super rich there. She said there may be a class of lower-middle-class that suffer more as they're not poor enough to get the government to pay, but not middle-class enough to be able to pay for it themselves... but overall, people of all income levels get similar treatment.

Canadians often feel that their "free" medical system is sacrosanct, but the truth is that it leads to awful wait times, inefficiencies, abuses, and poor service.

Japan has, perhaps, one of the most balanced and efficient systems in the world ( It's Japan are we surprised that it's efficient ). The system has its warts, but it's a hybrid co-pay system. For most treatments, you are required to pay 30% for some procedures ( and I believe 20% for some others ) and the government sets the cost of most treatments. It also covers dental, which is nice. This keeps the system affordable and efficient, without being abused or wasteful. When people get something for free, everyone stops caring. Doctors stop caring about giving the best treatment, because they're not dealing with paying customers. People have lower expectations of doctors and don't hold them to a higher standard because it's not really perceived as coming out of their pockets directly. People have low expectations of free stuff.

I'll give you one example:

A few years ago my father-in-law ( Canadian Permanent Resident, Japanese citizen ) had to get eye surgery. He opted to fly to Japan... I think he'd still be on the wait list for a specialist here. There were two options.

We'll call them the "GOLD" option and the "SILVER" option.

The doctors explained that the "GOLD" option is the more permanent solution, and a better ( more expensive ) procedure, but given his age, the "SILVER" option is all he will probably need in his life.

I think the difference in cost ( to him ) was something like $1000 vs. $3000.

They gave him the choice.

In the USA, it's likely both of those procedures would have been far more costly, and the choice would likely have been dictated by:
  1. What your insurance company will cover
  2. How much money you have over what your insurance covers

YOU STILL GET MORE CHOICE

In Canada, you would NOT be given a choice. The doctor would choose for you whatever is most efficient for the system based on what they think you need. And sure, they're the professional, but it takes control of your OWN health out of your hands. You can't even offer to pay the difference in Canada as that would show up the failures in the system.

If you are forced to pay a nominal fee for medical procedures, then you will definitely hold a medical practitioner to a higher standard. If a GP consistently is a jerk and doesn't treat his clients well, no way anyone is going to pay $20 to get him to diagnose a nagging cough. And you will find a GP will go a little further to really diagnose the problem. In addition, fewer people will show up to the emergency room to diagnose a cold. When you attach a VALUE to something, quality usually goes up and abuse goes down.

Canadians need to GET OVER the idea that user fees are bad for your health. It's quite the opposite. The problem is that ANY changes in fee structure in Canada leads Canadians to think that their system is becoming Americanized, and that scares people to death.

And what about the people in poverty? Easy-peasy. Do the same thing that we do for MSP in BC. Tie it to income. If you don't have the money to pay, we got your back.

Back to my father-in-law... He chose the SILVER level.
Well this American who is now in the Canadian health care system as a permanent resident (and is still also the recipient of American private health care insurance) says your comments above is B.S..

I have been in the Canadian health care system since 1969. And yes, I've had one major misdiagnosis here in Canada that I could have sued for some 35 years ago but I'll say this,...they also saved my life back then with some awesome surgical skills...."so that's water under the bridge."

Today I'm gladly back in Canadian medical care because my American health care system screwed up royally. A law suit might very well be in the cards once I return home to the states.
     
     
  #1391  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2016, 10:37 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by twoNeurons View Post
You can't correlate life expectancy with health care systems. It doesn't really work that way. There are a WIDE variety of societal, nutritional, cultural, and other things that affect life expectancy.

A friend of mine did her nurse degree and got offered a job in the USA. She said, of Canada's medical system, that she feels much safer in a US hospital. She's filipino, and a very balanced person.

She mentioned that USA systems are much more advanced and their procedures are better, overall. People are more careful and the quality of care is considerably higher. She also states that medicare is fairly even for US residents... while care in general is more expensive, it's not just for the super rich there. She said there may be a class of lower-middle-class that suffer more as they're not poor enough to get the government to pay, but not middle-class enough to be able to pay for it themselves... but overall, people of all income levels get similar treatment.

Canadians often feel that their "free" medical system is sacrosanct, but the truth is that it leads to awful wait times, inefficiencies, abuses, and poor service.

Japan has, perhaps, one of the most balanced and efficient systems in the world ( It's Japan are we surprised that it's efficient ). The system has its warts, but it's a hybrid co-pay system. For most treatments, you are required to pay 30% for some procedures ( and I believe 20% for some others ) and the government sets the cost of most treatments. It also covers dental, which is nice. This keeps the system affordable and efficient, without being abused or wasteful. When people get something for free, everyone stops caring. Doctors stop caring about giving the best treatment, because they're not dealing with paying customers. People have lower expectations of doctors and don't hold them to a higher standard because it's not really perceived as coming out of their pockets directly. People have low expectations of free stuff.

I'll give you one example:

A few years ago my father-in-law ( Canadian Permanent Resident, Japanese citizen ) had to get eye surgery. He opted to fly to Japan... I think he'd still be on the wait list for a specialist here. There were two options.

We'll call them the "GOLD" option and the "SILVER" option.

The doctors explained that the "GOLD" option is the more permanent solution, and a better ( more expensive ) procedure, but given his age, the "SILVER" option is all he will probably need in his life.

I think the difference in cost ( to him ) was something like $1000 vs. $3000.

They gave him the choice.

In the USA, it's likely both of those procedures would have been far more costly, and the choice would likely have been dictated by:
  1. What your insurance company will cover
  2. How much money you have over what your insurance covers

YOU STILL GET MORE CHOICE

In Canada, you would NOT be given a choice. The doctor would choose for you whatever is most efficient for the system based on what they think you need. And sure, they're the professional, but it takes control of your OWN health out of your hands. You can't even offer to pay the difference in Canada as that would show up the failures in the system.

If you are forced to pay a nominal fee for medical procedures, then you will definitely hold a medical practitioner to a higher standard. If a GP consistently is a jerk and doesn't treat his clients well, no way anyone is going to pay $20 to get him to diagnose a nagging cough. And you will find a GP will go a little further to really diagnose the problem. In addition, fewer people will show up to the emergency room to diagnose a cold. When you attach a VALUE to something, quality usually goes up and abuse goes down.

Canadians need to GET OVER the idea that user fees are bad for your health. It's quite the opposite. The problem is that ANY changes in fee structure in Canada leads Canadians to think that their system is becoming Americanized, and that scares people to death.

And what about the people in poverty? Easy-peasy. Do the same thing that we do for MSP in BC. Tie it to income. If you don't have the money to pay, we got your back.

Back to my father-in-law... He chose the SILVER level.
Well, we still have a higher life expectancy despite having crappy healthcare. Maybe we just try to avoid being sick better than others. And then of course we have those irresponsible folks who screw with their own health driving up the universal health care cost for everyone else.

Maybe the government should start exploring having more private healthcare services and letting private practitioners set up hospitals/clinics, partially covered by our care card system. Healthy competition can perhaps push the government health care sector to enhance the quality of their services.
     
     
  #1392  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2016, 10:40 PM
Caliplanner1 Caliplanner1 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 692
Quote:
Originally Posted by twoNeurons View Post
JUST ONE MORE THING. Just so you don't think I'm hating on the Canadian system. The Canadian system has GREAT Emergency care.

Car accident, sudden heart attack, Emergency C-Section, severed limbs...

Fantastic, worry-free, no thoughts to how much it's going to cost. I'm not suggesting that these are bad.

I had an accident a few years ago, and within hours, I had a CAT Scan and was scheduled for an MRI and I even got a ride in an ambulance. Fortunately, I was fine... just a fractured rib.

But for either chronic problems, or elective surgical issues or long-term sicknesses, it's slow and all about the queue.

It's great for emergency care or healthy young people who have time on their side.
THANK YOU for your qualifying statements above! In the states wait times for the ordinary insured working class patient (for some procedures) can be as bad or worse than here in Canada......and if you're not careful you could also end up paying out of pocket too (in addition to paying your insurance fees).

What I like about the Canadian system here in B.C. is the instantaneous thorough/COMPREHENSIVE blood tests given as you arrive at the hospital 24 HOURS A DAY.

In the L.A. at say Kaiser you have to be referred by your primary doctor to a stand alone lab to get selective blood tests DURING BUSINESS HOURS ONLY. As a result many illnesses could go by undetected (over say a weekend period when your doctor is off duty) without you being able to receive specific treatment in a timely manner which could thus threaten your life.
     
     
  #1393  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2016, 10:43 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,518
I have worked in Canadian and US healthcare. The comparisons are very complex, but the US pays the most per capita for healthcare, BY FAR. It has middling outcomes when ranked against the rest of the developed world, some people have no coverage, and it is the only system in the developed world that isn't at least partially public.

Add up the dots...

The US is absolutely the place to go if you have 1% or better level wealth. They have the best of the best in most fields.
     
     
  #1394  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2016, 11:03 PM
Caliplanner1 Caliplanner1 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 692
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
I have worked in Canadian and US healthcare. The comparisons are very complex, but the US pays the most per capita for healthcare, BY FAR. It has middling outcomes when ranked against the rest of the developed world, some people have no coverage, and it is the only system in the developed world that isn't at least partially public.

Add up the dots...

The US is absolutely the place to go if you have 1% or better level wealth. They have the best of the best in most fields.
Agreed......if you are wealthy then the U.S. is for you. I find that in the states the private insurance run health care system puts PROFITS over PEOPLE!!!
     
     
  #1395  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2016, 11:38 PM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
Or maybe there are less people contracting cancer in Canada.
Actually no. Studies show actual cancer rates in Canada and the US are about the same. The thing is, detected cancer rates in the US are higher than Canada. So more people who have cancer are actually diagnosed, and generally are diagnosed earlier.
__________________
In the heart of a busy metropolis skyscrapers are a vivid reminder of the constant yearning of the human spirit to rise to God
     
     
  #1396  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2016, 11:51 PM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
I have worked in Canadian and US healthcare. The comparisons are very complex, but the US pays the most per capita for healthcare, BY FAR. It has middling outcomes when ranked against the rest of the developed world, some people have no coverage, and it is the only system in the developed world that isn't at least partially public.
That just isn't true.
  • Medicaid and CHIP cover nearly 70 million people, or about 22% of the US population.
  • There are also about 50 million Medicare recipients, which represent another 15% of the population (and growing every year).
  • Another 10-12 million people receive subsidies through ACA to buy private health insurance, that's another 5% of the population.
  • Then there's close to 10 million veterans who get their healthcare through the VA.
  • And about 9 million people get healthcare through Tricare.

There's also about $5 billion a year giving in federal grants to community health clinics. Plus state programs for health clinics
__________________
In the heart of a busy metropolis skyscrapers are a vivid reminder of the constant yearning of the human spirit to rise to God
     
     
  #1397  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2016, 12:08 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,042
France has a cutting edge medical system.
If you're poor (as established by a means test) then everything is free.
Normally, with the state-run "Sécurité Sociale" you're reimboursed about 65%, and the rest (including dental) is topped up 100% with a "mutuelle" or complementary private plan supllement.
The nurses are dignified and polite (so different here than the lurid verbal abuse I got at St. Paul's, including getting my ear pulled by a Chinese nurse while on IV)
Here, the nurses introduce themselves politely and are extremely attentive.
And if you can't sleep, they'll even give you a Valium, no hassle.
(They'd never do that in BC; it would be chloral hydrate or something equally primitive)
     
     
  #1398  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2016, 12:15 AM
Hourglass Hourglass is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Here and there
Posts: 754
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bcasey25raptor View Post
Probably the worst healthcare system in the developed world by far.
I'd have to disagree. Waiting >8 hours in A&E in a UK hospital to get a broken foot looked at because it wasn't life-threatening isn't cool

The NHS makes Canada's system look good by comparison.
     
     
  #1399  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2016, 12:25 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,042
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hourglass View Post
I'd have to disagree. Waiting >8 hours in A&E in a UK hospital to get a broken foot looked at because it wasn't life-threatening isn't cool

The NHS makes Canada's system look good by comparison.
That's for sure! In the UK, where I lived for a year and a half back in my late teens, if you weren't suffering a life-threatening illness, they'd give you a 10 minute (maximum) consultation,
then push you out the door, often with no prescription or anything, except a "carry on" attitude typical of the English.
     
     
  #1400  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2016, 1:11 AM
cornholio cornholio is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,916
Canadian health care system is pathetic and one of the biggest draw backs to living here considering you only have one health / one life. My wife who is Brazilian and all her Brazilian friends go back to Brazil or the US for all treatment. She has many Mexican and Latin American friends (worked for a Spain company for well over a decade dealing with Latin America/EU and speaks near native Spanish) and they also go back home or to the US for treatment. They are all afraid of the Canadian health care system. As for me I am originally from central/eastern Europe and everyone I know also goes back home for any checks / screenings/ and major problems. I have gone through the Canadian health care system my self a few times due to serious injuries and never again. I am lucky to be alive and in other cases I suffered for way too long before being treated. My mother was a nurse back in Europe before coming here and she is horrified of the system here, now she spends time back and forth and makes sure she gets all her treatments and screenings back home. The Canadian health care system is broken and dangerous, which is unfortunate because Canada is a great country.

As for Jebby, I think I made my point. Don't get me wrong, I know how Mexico functions and I know where your family fits in. If I was in your shoes and born into money that has probably been passed down for generations I would do exactly the same thing. I however was not born into money, I was born in a communist country with nothing and came to Canada with my family as political refugees with literally nothing, not a single dollar and just the bags we could fit on the plane. No inheritances. No nothing. Everything me, my family my brothers built is from nothing, and we have all done very well.

Also as for someone asking why live in Mexico City? If you have money and speak Spanish then Mexico City is a great place to live and much better then Vancouver. If you don't have money or are just middle class then Mexico city obviously sucks. Mexico is a very unequal country and it provides a very good life for those at the very top, very good life and the 80's/90's are over and done with and the risk of a leftist uprising is as low as ever, hence Jebby's family going back.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Business & the Economy
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:54 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.