HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4481  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2016, 5:34 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyro View Post
I was always curious Stormer, how many seats would you estimate are endzone, corner endzone seats from the entire capacity of the stadium?
I don't have it handy, but will look when I have a chance. they sold it as having more sideline seats than Taylor Field, but they are counting end zone sideline seats that TF of which has very few.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4482  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2016, 6:08 PM
TechnicalRecession TechnicalRecession is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 488
Quote:
Originally Posted by Treesplease View Post
Yeah, I like soccer and get obsessed with it every 4 years during the world cup (and the womens world cup) but yeah, I had the same reaction to the soccer markings; it really mucks up the field. But I suppose all sports (still debate whether soccer is sport or theatre/drama) need to be able to play there.
Right, because the 10 times a year the riders play at the stadium means the field shouldn't have a few other markings for other sports so other sports communities can use it. Soccer teams play at Mosiac all throughout the summer and hopefully the same happens in the new stadium. You might not care for soccer but I bet there are more soccer players in the city than there are football players..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4483  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2016, 6:31 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by TechnicalRecession View Post
Right, because the 10 times a year the riders play at the stadium means the field shouldn't have a few other markings for other sports so other sports communities can use it. Soccer teams play at Mosiac all throughout the summer and hopefully the same happens in the new stadium. You might not care for soccer but I bet there are more soccer players in the city than there are football players..
Yes but they don't need to play in a $300 million stadium. - it just make no sense.

They should definitely leave the old turf at TF for minor sports until they actually need the land for redevelopment. They should also turn the practice field into a soccer field.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4484  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2016, 7:45 PM
HomerSPC's Avatar
HomerSPC HomerSPC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Regina, Sk
Posts: 459
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
Yes but they don't need to play in a $300 million stadium. - it just make no sense.
What part of multi-purpose sports facility did you miss?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4485  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2016, 8:15 PM
Treesplease Treesplease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 990
Quote:
Originally Posted by TechnicalRecession View Post
Right, because the 10 times a year the riders play at the stadium means the field shouldn't have a few other markings for other sports so other sports communities can use it. Soccer teams play at Mosiac all throughout the summer and hopefully the same happens in the new stadium. You might not care for soccer but I bet there are more soccer players in the city than there are football players..
I didn't say I don't care for soccer - I like it. I said the marks mess up the field. Paint or chalk yellow marks when they play soccer. How many people show up for amateur soccer games outside mom and dad? Lots of places in Regina can accomodate crowds of 25 to 30, not just mosaic.

Yes, I realize it was called a "multi-purpose" facility in press releases. But it was built for FOOTBALL.

Edit: the lines are in now so its a moot point.

Last edited by Treesplease; Jul 27, 2016 at 9:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4486  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2016, 10:46 PM
TechnicalRecession TechnicalRecession is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 488
Quote:
Originally Posted by Treesplease View Post
I didn't say I don't care for soccer - I like it. I said the marks mess up the field. Paint or chalk yellow marks when they play soccer. How many people show up for amateur soccer games outside mom and dad? Lots of places in Regina can accomodate crowds of 25 to 30, not just mosaic.

Yes, I realize it was called a "multi-purpose" facility in press releases. But it was built for FOOTBALL.

Edit: the lines are in now so its a moot point.
These comments are ridiculous, it was sold to the public as a multi purpose facility and to be used by the community more than just 10 times a year. Just because a few extra lines on the pitch don't make it look as clean or nice as it would without doesn't justify not letting other community groups use it or chalking in lines. And to suggest that because the stadium won't fill up with fans for a soccer game justifies your argument boggles my mind.

If the football team ponied up the money to pay for the whole thing than sure limit it to just football. But taxpayers like you and myself paid and so we should get to use it other than going to a riders game.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4487  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2016, 10:51 PM
TechnicalRecession TechnicalRecession is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 488
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
Yes but they don't need to play in a $300 million stadium. - it just make no sense.

They should definitely leave the old turf at TF for minor sports until they actually need the land for redevelopment. They should also turn the practice field into a soccer field.
Wrong, it makes no sense to build something for close to $300 million, paid for in part by taxpayers and then tell them sorry you can't use it because this is only for a professional sports team that will use it 10 times a year. Why do you think soccer is played on Mosiac today? It's because there are not enough fields in the city to meet the demand. Fancy and new doesn't mean it should only benefit the elite..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4488  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 1:46 AM
Batcow Batcow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Regina
Posts: 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
Yes but they don't need to play in a $300 million stadium. - it just make no sense.

They should definitely leave the old turf at TF for minor sports until they actually need the land for redevelopment. They should also turn the practice field into a soccer field.
You opened a big can of worms with this one.

On riderfans, you defended the Mosaic symbol in the middle of the field because they are paying $20+ million. I completely agree with that. I personally like that it is Mosaic. It matches well with Saskatchewan and Regina symbolically.

But can you not see the parallels? The community is putting in more than $20+ million. The community plays various sports on turf. What are a couple of yellow lines that aren't that visible? It's not like it's a gigantic trademarked symbol in the middle of the field.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4489  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 2:06 AM
Treesplease Treesplease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 990
Quote:
Originally Posted by TechnicalRecession View Post
These comments are ridiculous, it was sold to the public as a multi purpose facility and to be used by the community more than just 10 times a year. Just because a few extra lines on the pitch don't make it look as clean or nice as it would without doesn't justify not letting other community groups use it or chalking in lines. And to suggest that because the stadium won't fill up with fans for a soccer game justifies your argument boggles my mind.

If the football team ponied up the money to pay for the whole thing than sure limit it to just football. But taxpayers like you and myself paid and so we should get to use it other than going to a riders game.
Multi use sports facilities cost $10 - $20 million. This is a football stadium. Something of this size/cost would not have been built for kids soccer.

Like I said the lines are in already and this is a pointless discussion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4490  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 2:13 AM
Treesplease Treesplease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 990
Quote:
Originally Posted by TechnicalRecession View Post
Wrong, it makes no sense to build something for close to $300 million, paid for in part by taxpayers and then tell them sorry you can't use it because this is only for a professional sports team that will use it 10 times a year. Why do you think soccer is played on Mosiac today? It's because there are not enough fields in the city to meet the demand. Fancy and new doesn't mean it should only benefit the elite..
The beautiful thing about soccer is that it can be played anywhere by anyone. The bit about not enough fields in the city for soccer in the summer is complete BS.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4491  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 2:32 AM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by Batcow View Post
You opened a big can of worms with this one.

On riderfans, you defended the Mosaic symbol in the middle of the field because they are paying $20+ million. I completely agree with that. I personally like that it is Mosaic. It matches well with Saskatchewan and Regina symbolically.

But can you not see the parallels? The community is putting in more than $20+ million. The community plays various sports on turf. What are a couple of yellow lines that aren't that visible? It's not like it's a gigantic trademarked symbol in the middle of the field.
Yeah I am losing this argument. I still think it is mostly politics.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4492  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 6:31 AM
TechnicalRecession TechnicalRecession is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 488
Quote:
Originally Posted by Treesplease View Post

The beautiful thing about soccer is that it can be played anywhere by anyone. The bit about not enough fields in the city for soccer in the summer is complete BS.
It is not BS at all. I am talking about organized soccer with proper goals, refs and linesman, not a bunch of kids playing pick up soccer. I've been playing city soccer for years and know people who work for the Regina soccer association. The demand is there and over the last number of years the reasons they have moved to more games on turf is because of the growing demand and the fact that grass fields lead to a lot of rain outs and then it becomes a scheduling nightmare to try to rebook all the rained out games. Men's soccer often play games at 9:30 at night just because that is the only time available.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4493  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 3:17 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by TechnicalRecession View Post
It is not BS at all. I am talking about organized soccer with proper goals, refs and linesman, not a bunch of kids playing pick up soccer. I've been playing city soccer for years and know people who work for the Regina soccer association. The demand is there and over the last number of years the reasons they have moved to more games on turf is because of the growing demand and the fact that grass fields lead to a lot of rain outs and then it becomes a scheduling nightmare to try to rebook all the rained out games. Men's soccer often play games at 9:30 at night just because that is the only time available.
I don't really feel sorry for them. My hockey team regularly has to play after 11pm.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4494  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 8:17 PM
Scruff Bucket's Avatar
Scruff Bucket Scruff Bucket is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 560
My friends, when I was studying at U of S, would typically play their hockey games at 2 or 3 am! (Benefits of youthful energy and absurdity!)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4495  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 8:48 PM
Festivus Festivus is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,283
Quote:
Originally Posted by Treesplease View Post
Multi use sports facilities cost $10 - $20 million. This is a football stadium. Something of this size/cost would not have been built for kids soccer.

Like I said the lines are in already and this is a pointless discussion.
No, it wasn't build for kids soccer. But it wouldn't have been built if kids soccer was going to be played there. Get it? The government wasn't going to pay for this unless it was going to be used for all activities and events. It doesn't matter that the CFL will be the biggest money-maker there, it matters that both were requirements (CFL and community), so therefore both have demands to be met.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4496  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 9:17 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,054
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4497  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 9:23 PM
Treesplease Treesplease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 990
Quote:
Originally Posted by Festivus View Post
No, it wasn't build for kids soccer. But it wouldn't have been built if kids soccer was going to be played there. Get it? The government wasn't going to pay for this unless it was going to be used for all activities and events. It doesn't matter that the CFL will be the biggest money-maker there, it matters that both were requirements (CFL and community), so therefore both have demands to be met.
ok....got it. Thanks for explaining it the way you see it. I think you are a bit off on a few points in terms of intent but no matter. If opinions were match sticks we could build one heck of a bonfire.

I don't think anyone has said it is either football OR soccer - not sure how you got off on that tangent.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4498  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 9:57 PM
Festivus Festivus is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,283
Quote:
Originally Posted by Treesplease View Post
ok....got it. Thanks for explaining it the way you see it. I think you are a bit off on a few points in terms of intent but no matter. If opinions were match sticks we could build one heck of a bonfire.

I don't think anyone has said it is either football OR soccer - not sure how you got off on that tangent.
I mean that if it is being built for use by both, then it is fair to have it be designed for both, especially if it's a requirement. If it was only the Roughriders ever playing there (and Rams, etc) then it would be fair to tailor it to them and no one else but since it was the city and province that paid for it, then it's fair to design it for easy use by soccer groups.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4499  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 10:08 PM
Treesplease Treesplease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 990
Quote:
Originally Posted by Festivus View Post
I mean that if it is being built for use by both, then it is fair to have it be designed for both, especially if it's a requirement. If it was only the Roughriders ever playing there (and Rams, etc) then it would be fair to tailor it to them and no one else but since it was the city and province that paid for it, then it's fair to design it for easy use by soccer groups.
I understand what you are saying.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4500  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 10:50 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by Festivus View Post
I mean that if it is being built for use by both, then it is fair to have it be designed for both, especially if it's a requirement. If it was only the Roughriders ever playing there (and Rams, etc) then it would be fair to tailor it to them and no one else but since it was the city and province that paid for it, then it's fair to design it for easy use by soccer groups.
Just to clarify, the Riders and their fans are paying $140 million. You're point is still valid though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:05 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.