HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1561  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2016, 9:58 PM
King Kill 'em King Kill 'em is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pyongyang
Posts: 1,230
Is it possible to revoke the historical status of a building?
     
     
  #1562  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2016, 10:04 PM
Valyrian Steel's Avatar
Valyrian Steel Valyrian Steel is offline
:o
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 966
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Kill 'em View Post
The garage at Flower/8th has historical status. It can't be torn down. ridiculous
LOL

Did God park there or something?
__________________
IG
     
     
  #1563  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2016, 10:28 PM
Wally West Wally West is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 231
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Kill 'em View Post
Is it possible to revoke the historical status of a building?
You don't want to set a bad precedent. If we somehow manage to revoke the historical status of a building, some developers would be willing to do the same for some of their buildings protected by historical status.
     
     
  #1564  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2016, 10:33 PM
King Kill 'em King Kill 'em is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pyongyang
Posts: 1,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wally West View Post
You don't want to set a bad precedent. If we somehow manage to revoke the historical status of a building, some developers would be willing to do the same for some of their buildings protected by historical status.
Ok I guess we're all going to have to chip in to pay someone to blow it up
     
     
  #1565  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2016, 10:49 PM
Jun's Avatar
Jun Jun is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Van Nuys
Posts: 318
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Kill 'em View Post
Is it possible to revoke the historical status of a building?
I think if its seismically unsound it could theoretically be torn down.
     
     
  #1566  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2016, 10:51 PM
ChelseaFC's Avatar
ChelseaFC ChelseaFC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,065
Here you go...


The General Petroleum Corporation Parking Garage shortly after its 1949 opening. Courtesy of the Photo Collection – Los Angeles Public Library.


https://nathanmasters.me/2013/10/29/dont-overlook-this-historic-parking-garage-in-downtown-l-a/
     
     
  #1567  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2016, 11:13 PM
ChelseaFC's Avatar
ChelseaFC ChelseaFC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,065
Anyone notice the plans on MFA's website to get rid of that ratty parking structure between the Bloc garage and 8th/Grand?



Eighth, Grand & Hope
Los Angeles, CA

Eighth, Grand & Hope is a 34,891 square foot development site located in the heart of downtown Los Angeles, along the north side of Eighth Street, between Grand and Hope Streets. The site is currently improved with a combination of surface and structure parking. MFA plans to develop this site with a residential apartment tower.
     
     
  #1568  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2016, 11:32 PM
LosAngelesSportsFan's Avatar
LosAngelesSportsFan LosAngelesSportsFan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,901
A 61 story tower was proposed for that site in 2008... Lets hope they move forward with that
     
     
  #1569  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2016, 11:37 PM
King Kill 'em King Kill 'em is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pyongyang
Posts: 1,230
The garage looked ugly even when it first opened.
     
     
  #1570  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2016, 1:08 AM
black_crow's Avatar
black_crow black_crow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 569
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Kill 'em View Post
The garage looked ugly even when it first opened.
I think it's the prettiest building in Downtown.

Actually... I could look at it day and night for the rest of my life, but I have a job and responsibility.
__________________

Real DTLA Development Group
     
     
  #1571  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2016, 1:34 AM
ChargerCarl ChargerCarl is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Los Angeles/San Francisco
Posts: 2,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wally West View Post
You don't want to set a bad precedent. If we somehow manage to revoke the historical status of a building, some developers would be willing to do the same for some of their buildings protected by historical status.
...well maybe they shouldn't be protected?
     
     
  #1572  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2016, 2:25 AM
Jun's Avatar
Jun Jun is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Van Nuys
Posts: 318
     
     
  #1573  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2016, 3:04 AM
NativeOrange's Avatar
NativeOrange NativeOrange is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Westminster/Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 331
Quote:
Originally Posted by black_crow View Post
I think it's the prettiest building in Downtown.

Actually... I could look at it day and night for the rest of my life, but I have a job and responsibility.
You been drinking?
     
     
  #1574  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2016, 3:09 AM
King Kill 'em King Kill 'em is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pyongyang
Posts: 1,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChargerCarl View Post
...well maybe they shouldn't be protected?
now that just crazy talk
     
     
  #1575  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2016, 3:30 AM
King Kill 'em King Kill 'em is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pyongyang
Posts: 1,230
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-convention-center-hotel-aeg-20160623-snap-story.html

Marriot expansion tower has been canceled. Too bad because I really liked the design of that tower.
     
     
  #1576  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2016, 3:54 AM
black_crow's Avatar
black_crow black_crow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 569
Quote:
Originally Posted by NativeOrange View Post
You been drinking?
Nah... it's obviously not the best looking option.

We can't change it. It will always be there.
__________________

Real DTLA Development Group
     
     
  #1577  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2016, 4:15 AM
ConstructDTLA's Avatar
ConstructDTLA ConstructDTLA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: LA
Posts: 1,454
Latest Spreadsheet, let me know if you have any input I should add.

Tragic to lose JW, but it was obvious as soon as they pushed their date back to 2017. Same with poor Shenzhen. Soon I predict we will see other projects come out and cancel like Macfarlane's 5-OH, all Barry Shy's, Apex 2, Alexan, etc.

2012-2018 Downtown LA Cycle by Hunter, on Flickr
__________________
     
     
  #1578  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2016, 5:55 AM
caligrad's Avatar
caligrad caligrad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 1,844
^^^ LOL, you're making the JW expansion cancelation sound like it was because of economic issues. That's not the case. As the article states, AEG has been fighting with city hall for almost 2 years now, this is merely their way of throwing a tantrum. I hope the city doesn't cave. AEG is greedy but not stupid. Once the other projects in the area come online, AEG will quietly bring their "canceled" project back to life, asking for their permits with their tails between their legs.

Shenzhen has pretty much always said they planned on breaking ground on the Luxe in 2017..... Not sure how that equates to "economic issues".

We've been DIC*** around by Barry Shy, Joseph Hellen and the other reject whos name escapes me for over a decade, so taking them serious is ridiculous and shouldn't be a "sign of economic issues" since they've been promising the moon with no means of actually getting there. If they magically all of a sudden cancel their projects, I don't think anyone on this thread would be surprised since no one on here actually took them serious.

Projects cancel, revive, change and so on. That's normal even in the best economic situations. Not sure why LA would be any different. We're getting what seems to be a proposal every other month. Not bad for a city that went almost 2 decades with near zero proposals.

On the old thread, you promised us that your insider knowledge of the markets said that we would see a major economic downturn in MAY. Well here we are in June and I'm still waiting......

(P.S. the UK just voted to leave the EU, so tomorrows stock BS doesn't count HAHA)
     
     
  #1579  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2016, 6:31 AM
black_crow's Avatar
black_crow black_crow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 569
Quote:
Originally Posted by ConstructDTLA View Post
Latest Spreadsheet, let me know if you have any input I should add.

Tragic to lose JW, but it was obvious as soon as they pushed their date back to 2017. Same with poor Shenzhen. Soon I predict we will see other projects come out and cancel like Macfarlane's 5-OH, all Barry Shy's, Apex 2, Alexan, etc.
I think you are more wrong than ever and you know that I am not alone here.

So I don't want to discuss that running (circle) gag any further.
Do you see all the green and all the new proposals on your list?

Yes? That's why Downtown is one of the hottest markets in the US.



PS:

But you are a really brave soul. Everybody in L.A. knows your name for exactly two things:

- good photos

plus

- the end of the circle

Still... you keep it going. ^^
Nobody here should be angry anymore...

Take it with a smile.
__________________

Real DTLA Development Group
     
     
  #1580  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2016, 1:36 PM
Easy's Avatar
Easy Easy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,598
Thanks for reposting the table Huntet. What does it mean that frankentower 2 is in green? That's underway isn't it?

I'm disappointed that so far nothing seems to be happening with the urban Mack tower when groundbreaking seemed imminent a few weeks ago. Same with Apex 2 and I'm not really sure what's going on with 888 hope.

Regarding the Marriott expansion, I can see why a private developer wouldn't want to compete with the city. Hard to win that competition. I wouldn't be surprised if other hotel developers didn't agree and stalled their projects.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:48 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.