HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4741  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2016, 1:01 PM
Bigtime's Avatar
Bigtime Bigtime is offline
Very tall. Such Scrape.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by CTrainDude View Post
Looks like Edelweiss is planning the same service next year as well. Schedule is obviously preliminary only.

http://www.routesonline.com/news/38/airl...nary-a340-operations/?platform=hootsuite
Far out but is also looks like they'll use the A340-300, can't wait to see that thing chew up all the available runway on 17L/35R in the summer.
     
     
  #4742  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2016, 2:22 PM
cyeg66's Avatar
cyeg66 cyeg66 is offline
Contôleur aérien YYC
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Really, really north Leduc
Posts: 1,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime View Post
Far out but is also looks like they'll use the A340-300, can't wait to see that thing chew up all the available runway on 17L/35R in the summer.
Ugh. Hate that p.o.s. (from the ATC perspective, naturally)
__________________
Trainer of dolphins and certified Shorkie whisperer
     
     
  #4743  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2016, 2:29 PM
Bigtime's Avatar
Bigtime Bigtime is offline
Very tall. Such Scrape.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyeg66 View Post
Ugh. Hate that p.o.s. (from the ATC perspective, naturally)
All the power of 4 APU's on the wings.

However I have always liked the look of the A343, but the A345 with the larger engines and its proportions just looked great in my eyes.
     
     
  #4744  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2016, 3:27 PM
thenoflyzone thenoflyzone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 4,301
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acey View Post
Yep. WS opted for the most powerful of 3 engines available for the 736. As for the A332, it is 10 tonnes lighter than the 333 but has the same engine options. Rockets.
The A330 in general doesn't have the reputation of a fast climber. We see them a lot here in YUL and the performance is average, even on the A332. Now the A310 or MD11 on the other hand, oh yes !

They don't build'em like they used to.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime View Post
Far out but is also looks like they'll use the A340-300, can't wait to see that thing chew up all the available runway on 17L/35R in the summer.
Yup.

If by next year, the A343 is using half of runway 29 to takeoff, you'll know the plane is empty !
     
     
  #4745  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2016, 2:25 AM
Acey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by thenoflyzone View Post
The A330 in general doesn't have the reputation of a fast climber.
332 does well in comparison to 333 for the reason I stated, and that's the only argument I was making - KL's performance at YYC is evidence of that. 332 decent at high altitude as well.
     
     
  #4746  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2016, 3:59 PM
YYCguys YYCguys is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,624
[QUOTE]Omni is on standby until June 5th. Not sure what happens after that [QUOTE]

Omni's contract has been extended till the 18th of this month.
     
     
  #4747  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2016, 10:17 PM
yyc_engineer's Avatar
yyc_engineer yyc_engineer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Somewhere between OOL and MCY
Posts: 427
Got to ride on the YYC Link this week, not gonna lie it's pretty sweet. Reminded me of taking the airside monorail at MCO as a kid.


http://i.imgur.com/PApKuTB.jpg


http://i.imgur.com/Hwby2Kd.jpg

Some night shots of the IFP with AA's 319
*photos not my own


http://i.imgur.com/8GYdEdE.jpg


http://i.imgur.com/eo3QpAy.jpg
     
     
  #4748  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2016, 10:41 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,596
Quote:
Originally Posted by yyc_engineer View Post
Got to ride on the YYC Link this week, not gonna lie it's pretty sweet. Reminded me of taking the airside monorail at MCO as a kid.
Is the link guided a bit on sections inbetween stations?
     
     
  #4749  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2016, 8:16 AM
Acey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
IFP looks very YEGish.



I guess there's only x number of ways that modern concourses look.
     
     
  #4750  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2016, 2:56 PM
hoboman27 hoboman27 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by yyc_engineer View Post
Got to ride on the YYC Link this week, not gonna lie it's pretty sweet. Reminded me of taking the airside monorail at MCO as a kid.


http://i.imgur.com/PApKuTB.jpg
Interesting looking vehicles... How much did these units cost? 40-50k?
     
     
  #4751  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2016, 5:43 AM
casper's Avatar
casper casper is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 12,755
Quote:
Originally Posted by hoboman27 View Post
Interesting looking vehicles... How much did these units cost? 40-50k?
Cute. I like the roof over the driver compartment. A necessary feature to keep the driver dry, in case the sprinklers go off.

I was passing through about a week ago. Arrived in the main air Canada pier and had to walk over to the middle peer to catch the outbound to Toronto. The Narita flight was boarding at the next gate at the same time. Crowded little corner. Anyway, walking through the two peer there was a normal walkway area, a moving walkway and the track for the cute little cars. Some good options.
     
     
  #4752  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2016, 11:51 AM
Johnny Aussie's Avatar
Johnny Aussie Johnny Aussie is online now
G'day
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 4,468
Integral Air changes

The new Edson service has been removed from their website and schedules.

Also, they have publicly put the YYC-YXC route on notice due to low numbers.

Interesting statement on their schedule page....

http://www.integraair.com/calgary-cranbrook/
     
     
  #4753  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2016, 4:14 PM
cyeg66's Avatar
cyeg66 cyeg66 is offline
Contôleur aérien YYC
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Really, really north Leduc
Posts: 1,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Aussie View Post
The new Edson service has been removed from their website and schedules.

Also, they have publicly put the YYC-YXC route on notice due to low numbers.

Interesting statement on their schedule page....

http://www.integraair.com/calgary-cranbrook/
Trying my hardest not to appear shocked...
__________________
Trainer of dolphins and certified Shorkie whisperer
     
     
  #4754  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2016, 11:31 PM
Johnny Aussie's Avatar
Johnny Aussie Johnny Aussie is online now
G'day
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 4,468
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyeg66 View Post
Trying my hardest not to appear shocked...
Yeah... News has been a bit slow lately. Integra has certainly been trying new routes lately. Bad timing I suppose.

The post was aimed more at their public announcement in red... WARNING WARNING! And with "heavy hearts" even.... never really seen anything like that published in a public domain before. Usually those types of comments are kept internal.
     
     
  #4755  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2016, 3:45 AM
zahav zahav is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,052
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Aussie View Post
I guess the inevitable has finally caught up to YYC.

http://www.yyc.com/en-us/media/factsfigures/passengerstatistics.aspx

Pax numbers fell 2.2% in April 2016 compared to April 2015.

Transborder got smashed, while International did very well.

Overall down 2.2% (down 27,135) to 1,198,576. YTD up 1.25%.
Domestic down 0.9% (down 7,867) to 836,559. YTD up 3.09%
Transborder down 11.8% (down 29,860) to 222,245. YTD down 7.90%
International up 8.2% (up 10,592) to 139,772. YTD up 7.72%

Still up overall for the year at least. Transborder has fallen below 3 million again for the rolling 12 month period. Most likely will stay below 3 million for the year at this rate.
YYC removed the April stats a few days after posting, and still haven't reposted... I wonder what's up?

http://www.yyc.com/en-us/media/factsfigures/passengerstatistics.aspx
     
     
  #4756  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2016, 5:31 AM
Bureaudog Bureaudog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 19
HU111 - Hainan test flight arrives tomorrow (Wednesday) at 0845, said to be staff only. First flight on June 30, anticipated to be full flights through the summer.

ITD (international to domestic) trials have expanded to Westjet flights (currently only one). Now includes AC845 and many US origin flights.
     
     
  #4757  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2016, 6:11 AM
yyc_engineer's Avatar
yyc_engineer yyc_engineer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Somewhere between OOL and MCY
Posts: 427
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bureaudog View Post
HU111 - Hainan test flight arrives tomorrow (Wednesday) at 0845, said to be staff only.
Thanks for the heads up! Didn't know this was a thing!? (test flights)

Calgary Airport has been busy getting ready for Hainan's launch. Among other things this includes Chinese language announcements in Concourse A and getting concessionaires ready to accept UnionPay. I have also noticed an increase in Hainan billboards around town last few days, swear I drove past 3 of them just yesterday.
     
     
  #4758  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2016, 10:44 AM
The Chemist's Avatar
The Chemist The Chemist is offline
恭喜发财!
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: 中国上海/Shanghai
Posts: 8,875
I will be coming back to Calgary in the spring for my brother's wedding - I may have to give the new Hainan Airlines flight a try just to show support for a direct China-Calgary flight, even if it is a bit less convenient than flying PVG-YVR-YYC.
__________________
"Nothing is too wonderful to be true, if it be consistent with the laws of nature." - Michael Faraday (1791-1867)
     
     
  #4759  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2016, 12:58 PM
outoftheice outoftheice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 914
Quote:
Originally Posted by yyc_engineer View Post
Thanks for the heads up! Didn't know this was a thing!? (test flights)
I honestly don't think it is. After 12 years of working for airlines in North America and Europe, I've never heard of anyone doing a test flight prior to starting a new destination... only test flights prior to introducing a new type.
     
     
  #4760  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2016, 1:09 PM
Bigtime's Avatar
Bigtime Bigtime is offline
Very tall. Such Scrape.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by outoftheice View Post
I honestly don't think it is. After 12 years of working for airlines in North America and Europe, I've never heard of anyone doing a test flight prior to starting a new destination... only test flights prior to introducing a new type.
Years ago when Japan Airlines and Korean did the summer charter flights I recall Japan Airlines sending a 744 here on a test flight in the winter, I'm thinking February.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:56 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.