HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #9701  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2016, 4:09 PM
Alex Mackinnon's Avatar
Alex Mackinnon Alex Mackinnon is offline
Can I has a tunnel?
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,217
Quote:
Originally Posted by MIPS View Post
There's an interesting test.

Put a temperature logger in a MK I with the windows closed when it goes out of service and have it retrieved again when it returns to service. Repeat again with another car with its windows open. See how it fairs inside. Can't be that hard to get TransLink's approval for that kind of an experiment.
The refurbs will also have more thermal gain due to the darker colours used on the outside.
__________________
"It's ok, I'm an engineer!" -Famous last words
     
     
  #9702  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2016, 4:31 PM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,330
Is there no way for the MarksI trains to be retrofited to have better air circulations? It doesn't even have to be air conditioning, but a roof vent that allows air in at the front of the train and one that lets air out at the back would go a long way towards getting rid of hot air (and smells).
     
     
  #9703  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2016, 6:58 PM
Kisai Kisai is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 1,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meraki View Post
Yeah. I didn't think of locking them. Years ago though I suggested that an annoying, constant tone/alarm should play. So the window can be opened if it's an emergency, but if opened during normal operation it'll piss people off until closed again.

Without some sort of negative consequence for opening windows people will keep doing it. My anecdotal observation from riding the 9 is that 33-50% of the new XDE60 passing by, someone's opened the windows ignoring the label and defeating the purpose of the A/C.
The annoying constant tone thing is what school buses did in the 80's. I'm not sure if they still do it, but it was basically to warn the driver that someone might fall out of the bus if they don't stop.
     
     
  #9704  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2016, 7:46 PM
Large Cat's Avatar
Large Cat Large Cat is offline
Vancouver Bus Driver
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meraki View Post
Yeah. I didn't think of locking them. Years ago though I suggested that an annoying, constant tone/alarm should play. So the window can be opened if it's an emergency, but if opened during normal operation it'll piss people off until closed again.

Without some sort of negative consequence for opening windows people will keep doing it. My anecdotal observation from riding the 9 is that 33-50% of the new XDE60 passing by, someone's opened the windows ignoring the label and defeating the purpose of the A/C.
There should also be some sort of negative consequence for bus drivers letting the coach get too hot, which is the original reason people have learnt to open the windows no matter what. Maybe some sort of temperature/humidity sensor in different areas of the coach which sends annoying warning signals to the driver which passengers can also hear.
     
     
  #9705  
Old Posted Jun 3, 2016, 2:32 AM
MIPS's Avatar
MIPS MIPS is offline
SkyTrain Nut
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kamloops
Posts: 2,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Mackinnon View Post
The refurbs will also have more thermal gain due to the darker colours used on the outside.
Oh god yes. I was in the region a month ago during that nice little span of good weather and the new paint job really did not help with the ventilation issues in the cars. Every time I got on the first thing I did was open all the windows.

Quote:
Is there no way for the Mark I trains to be retrofited to have better air circulations? It doesn't even have to be air conditioning, but a roof vent that allows air in at the front of the train and one that lets air out at the back would go a long way towards getting rid of hot air (and smells).
Been a while since I investigated but I seem to recall the two squirrel cage fans in each car pull in air from the ceiling vents and exhaust it out the exterior sides of the car. The fans do have a High setting but I rarely ever hear it being used because it has to be manually switched.
     
     
  #9706  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2016, 10:46 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,782
     
     
  #9707  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2016, 11:03 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,728
I understand that there are safety reasons for dividing the tunnel, but I'm disappointed that they are dividing the tunnel. I was looking forward to view from the front of the train as it traveled through such a large tunnel.
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis
     
     
  #9708  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2016, 11:05 PM
Mac Write Mac Write is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,423
The tunnel half easily looks wide enough to have a Canada line train go through it, maybe even a double decker train LOL.
     
     
  #9709  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2016, 1:47 AM
Kisai Kisai is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 1,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFUVancouver View Post
I understand that there are safety reasons for dividing the tunnel, but I'm disappointed that they are dividing the tunnel. I was looking forward to view from the front of the train as it traveled through such a large tunnel.
There are safety/areodynamic reasons for this. On the safety side it contains smoke/fire to one half of the tunnel. On the Aerodynamic side the air pressure moves only in one direction. Without the separation it creates additional wind resistance and noise when trains pass each other, and actually damages the trains and parts of the infrastructure. In high-speed trains they actually have to design for preventing tunnel-booms.
     
     
  #9710  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2016, 10:17 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,782
Looks like they shifted the guideway to the roadway to reduce encroachment on the greenspace.

Normally, the track entering a station is a straight line for smoother braking, and the track exiting a station is the curved one, since speed would be lower.

Quote:
Originally Posted by skymaster View Post
...
     
     
  #9711  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2016, 11:41 PM
BCPhil BCPhil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Looks like they shifted the guideway to the roadway to reduce encroachment on the greenspace.

Normally, the track entering a station is a straight line for smoother braking, and the track exiting a station is the curved one, since speed would be lower.
Depending on the frequency, most trains will probably be entering directly into the west (westbound) platform, like at Waterfront on the Canada Line. By configuring it like this, they made the more frequent jog over to the west side shorter, and only trains going into temporary storage would have the jog to the right.
     
     
  #9712  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2016, 1:47 AM
Millennium2002 Millennium2002 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,742
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCPhil View Post
Depending on the frequency, most trains will probably be entering directly into the west (westbound) platform, like at Waterfront on the Canada Line. By configuring it like this, they made the more frequent jog over to the west side shorter, and only trains going into temporary storage would have the jog to the right.
That sounds about right. In any case, there's the opposite set of switches just south, meaning the operation can be easily reversed if need be.
     
     
  #9713  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2016, 8:46 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,782
That makes sense - I guess they aren't thinking too much of operation after extension.
     
     
  #9714  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2016, 9:59 PM
DKaz DKaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kelowna BC & Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,299
That station would've been so awesome for me 14 years ago.
     
     
  #9715  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2016, 2:36 PM
queetz@home's Avatar
queetz@home queetz@home is offline
Go Rotem! Die Bombardier!
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ortigas
Posts: 3,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by DKaz View Post
That station would've been so awesome for me 14 years ago.
Oooh that would have been awesome for the entire Lower Mainland 14 years ago...

Government keeps Evergreen Line costs, overruns shrouded in secrecy

Quote:


The BC Liberal government is refusing to show how much it has spent so far on the Evergreen Line.

The Millennium Line SkyTrain extension to Coquitlam and Port Moody was budgeted at $1.43 billion, but the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure censored the spending breakdown from the April financial summary, which was released last week under Freedom of Information.
     
     
  #9716  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2016, 8:29 PM
jsbertram jsbertram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
That makes sense - I guess they aren't thinking too much of operation after extension.
Later this century when Evergreen is extended eastwards to Maple Ridge and becomes the Lougheed - Coquitlam - Maple Ridge 'mainline', the segment up Pinetree will become a convenient way to short-turn trains and send them back to Lougheed.
     
     
  #9717  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2016, 9:12 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,782
Yeah, I'm in the "where's that going to extend to"? camp as to future extensions.
     
     
  #9718  
Old Posted Jun 30, 2016, 11:28 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,782
Coquitlam segment video at Evergreen Facebook:

https://www.facebook.com/evergreenline
     
     
  #9719  
Old Posted Jul 1, 2016, 9:47 PM
MIPS's Avatar
MIPS MIPS is offline
SkyTrain Nut
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kamloops
Posts: 2,112
Quote:
when are you testing thru the tunnel?
Quote:
Hi Terry, we’ll have test trains in the tunnel later this summer.
Now that's what I wanna hera!
     
     
  #9720  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2016, 3:59 AM
jsbertram jsbertram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Yeah, I'm in the "where's that going to extend to"? camp as to future extensions.
I've thought that the Lafarge-Douglas would remain a terminal.

I'm not sure if there are plans to extend it up Pinetree to Westwood Plateau, or somehow extending eastwards over to somewhere on Coast Meridian.

I think Westwood Plateau doesn't (and won't) have the population density to support an extension up Pinetree, and any stations east of the river are easier done as part of the next extension along the CPR tracks to Maple Ridge (or Mission)
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:05 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.