HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5401  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2016, 7:17 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
^ Looking good, Edmonton.

Yeah, that Next stadium is really beneath Calgary. You'd think they'd be too embarrassed to wheel out a turkey like that. It would be lame even for a place like Halifax with no football pedigree. Honestly, it would be like CSEG proposing a copy of the Regina Agridome as a new rink for the Flames.
     
     
  #5402  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2016, 7:20 PM
davidivivid davidivivid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ville de Québec City
Posts: 3,060
This news was just announced in Quebec newspapers and seems relevant here considering the present discussion.

Quote:
The Mayor of Québec City to meet with IOC President Thomas Bach

The Mayor of Québec City, Régis Labeaume, will travel to Lausanne, Switzerland, this coming April 11, to attend a meeting initiated by the President of the International Olympic Committee (IOC), Thomas Bach.

"Over the past several years, I have often mentioned that the gigantism of the Olympic Games and the astronomical costs involved in organizing them no longer made any sense – to the point where no large city would be interested in hosting them any more, and that this situation might perhaps lead the IOC to call us, stated the Mayor of Québec City, Régis Labeaume. This day came last December 4, when the IOC invited Québec City to a meeting to present its new frame of reference, Olympic Agenda 2020. I will meet with the President, Thomas Bach, and his team there. The population of Québec City knows my position concerning the Olympic Games, and until further notice, it remains unchanged."

"The Gouvernement du Québec looks favourably upon this new approach by the IOC, which seems open to reviewing downward the costs involved in hosting the Olympic Games. From this viewpoint, Québec will support the City in its analysis and reflection process as to whether to move forward following its meeting with the President of the International Olympic Committee", stated the Minister responsible for Government Administration and Ongoing Program Review, Chair of the Conseil du trésor and Minister responsible for the Capitale-Nationale region, Sam Hamad.

Within the next few years, if Québec City decided to submit a bid, the following conditions would all have to apply:

- strong and unwavering social acceptability on the part of the population;
- support from the different levels of government;
- respect of the financial framework of Québec City;
- a real likelihood of being selected at the Canadian level and by the IOC.
__________________
"I went on a diet, swore off drinking and heavy eating, and in fourteen days I lost two weeks" Joe E. Lewis
     
     
  #5403  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2016, 7:25 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
^ IOC President doing his sales pitch, I guess.

So much for mistercorporate's theory that Quebec is off the Olympics list.

Smart move by Labeaume... he appears to be making it clear that any Quebec bid won't involve writing a blank cheque to the Olympic mafia. If the games come to Quebec it should be on their terms, not the IOC cronies'. Hopefully the CSA will do the same with FIFA.
     
     
  #5404  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2016, 9:24 PM
VANRIDERFAN's Avatar
VANRIDERFAN VANRIDERFAN is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 5,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
^ Looking good, Edmonton.

Yeah, that Next stadium is really beneath Calgary. You'd think they'd be too embarrassed to wheel out a turkey like that. It would be lame even for a place like Halifax with no football pedigree. Honestly, it would be like CSEG proposing a copy of the Regina Agridome as a new rink for the Flames.
Man you are really hitting below the belt when you compare Calgary to Regina!!!!
     
     
  #5405  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2016, 9:35 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
^ Haha, that's no knock on Regina. Reminds me of how one of my old friends from Sask once put it after he came back unimpressed from a trip from Calgary:

"Meh. Calgary is like Regina but without the Riders."

     
     
  #5406  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2016, 11:23 PM
speedog's Avatar
speedog speedog is offline
Moran supreme
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,579
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
^ Looking good, Edmonton.

Yeah, that Next stadium is really beneath Calgary. You'd think they'd be too embarrassed to wheel out a turkey like that. It would be lame even for a place like Halifax with no football pedigree. Honestly, it would be like CSEG proposing a copy of the Regina Agridome as a new rink for the Flames.
I, as a Calgarian, take exception to your statement above as it wasn't Calgary that wheeled out this turkey. This was entirely of CSEC's doing and should not be considered representative of what Calgarians might actually want to see or support.
__________________
Just a wee bit below average prairie boy in Canada's third largest city and fourth largest CMA
     
     
  #5407  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2016, 12:11 AM
isaidso isaidso is offline
North of Gilead
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Gilead
Posts: 11,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
^ Looking good, Edmonton.

Yeah, that Next stadium is really beneath Calgary. You'd think they'd be too embarrassed to wheel out a turkey like that.
Agee. The Edmonton arenas looks fabulous while the Calgary proposal makes me cringe every time it's posted. YUCK, YUCK, YUCK!
__________________
ELBOWS UP CANADA, ELBOWS UP UKRAINE, ELBOWS UP GREENLAND
CANADA, EUROPE, NZ, AUSTRALIA, JAPAN, MEXICO STRONG

US REPUBLICANS/MAGA/ICE NOT WELCOME HERE, STAY OUT
     
     
  #5408  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2016, 1:29 AM
elly63 elly63 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
It would be lame even for a place like Halifax with no football pedigree.
Careful now, perhaps you meant to say major professional pedigree.
     
     
  #5409  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2016, 2:09 AM
mistercorporate's Avatar
mistercorporate mistercorporate is offline
The Fruit of Discipline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
^ IOC President doing his sales pitch, I guess.

So much for mistercorporate's theory that Quebec is off the Olympics list.

Smart move by Labeaume... he appears to be making it clear that any Quebec bid won't involve writing a blank cheque to the Olympic mafia. If the games come to Quebec it should be on their terms, not the IOC cronies'. Hopefully the CSA will do the same with FIFA.
The IOC is always encouraging bids and city mayor's frequently promote their cities campaigns whether they have national committee support or not. A similar dynamic happened before the last bid cycle where both Durban and Cape Town were maneuvering and considering a bid, their national Olympic committee made its own recommendations regarding which city is more appropriate at this time and what guarantees they would need. The IOC is desperate for bids right now since many Western cities are balking at bids once reality sinks in and the deadline arises. The more bids the more competitive a contest and the more willing cities are to spend.
__________________
MLS: Toronto FC
Canadian Premier League: York 9 FC
NBA: Raptors
     
     
  #5410  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2016, 4:17 AM
Welkin Welkin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 396
Quote:
Originally Posted by elly63 View Post
Calgary mega projects on the line as the city waits for funding announcements
Kevin Usselman 660news Mar 19, 2016

They’re all good proposals to help stimulate economic activity, but is there enough money available?

Three mega projects are on the drawing board in Calgary, all hoping they will receive some of the anticipated infrastructure spending announcements expected in the coming weeks from the city, provincial and federal governments.

Those looking for money include the $4.6 billion, 40 kilometre LRT Green Line, a $500 million expansion of the BMO Centre at Stampede Park and the $890 million Calgary Next Sports Complex.

Councillor Shane Keating tells 660 NEWS, the project or projects that will provided the biggest return for the city and Calgarians will likely win out.

“We have to look at not just for tomorrow, which ones the best bang for the dollar for tomorrow, but which ones the best bang for the long term as well. And I think that’s part of the huge evaluation,” he said.

Keating added he wishes they could fund all the proposed mega projects, but there is only so much money to go around.









This must be in some future Bizarro World of football where teams play 8 on 10 football. Come on folks, at least get the renderings correct. BTW, who is the dog mascot?
     
     
  #5411  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2016, 4:22 AM
Corndogger Corndogger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welkin View Post
This must be in some future Bizarro World of football where teams play 8 on 10 football. Come on folks, at least get the renderings correct. BTW, who is the dog mascot?
Mascot is "Ralph the Dog."
     
     
  #5412  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2016, 5:06 AM
elly63 elly63 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,783
del
     
     
  #5413  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2016, 6:10 AM
VIce VIce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welkin View Post
This must be in some future Bizarro World of football where teams play 8 on 10 football. Come on folks, at least get the renderings correct. BTW, who is the dog mascot?
Hey, its a field house - maybe it's a pickup game
     
     
  #5414  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2016, 7:56 AM
Oilkountry's Avatar
Oilkountry Oilkountry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,868
Every part of me believes the animated renders are just a sales pitch to the public. Show the Shallow side of the stadium with the track,soccer fields and basketball nets to take the stadium look away from it. I noticed they barley touched on the arena in the Cnext proposal and I found that odd.

Something tells me The stadium is going to look more like the horseshoed Mosiac meets 2 deck IGF with a partially translucent roof like the "clay" renders show. And honestly I don't mind the idea that much. The gross Ferrari red clashes with the orange track and thats half of what I hate about those original renderings.

Let's not forget first renderings are usually way off, Here's The original IGF,Mosiac,TD Place and THF,




__________________
I don't want to hear your opinions on facts

Last edited by Oilkountry; Mar 25, 2016 at 8:19 AM.
     
     
  #5415  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2016, 8:14 AM
Oilkountry's Avatar
Oilkountry Oilkountry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,868
which evolved to these flashy more detailed version which then turn into the stadiums we have today




__________________
I don't want to hear your opinions on facts
     
     
  #5416  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2016, 3:41 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
^ The difference is that the renderings you posted were all designed to impress, and all of them were downgraded as the projects ran into fiscal reality. Some more than others... Winnipeg and Sask ended up with great stadiums, Ottawa's is not bad, Hamilton's is, well, meh.

But Calgary would be starting from a point where even the initial stadium rendering mean to wow and seduce people just flat out sucks. That's a scary thought, because where do you go from there?
     
     
  #5417  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2016, 3:52 PM
FrankieFlowerpot's Avatar
FrankieFlowerpot FrankieFlowerpot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,478
Even this is infinitely better than what's currently proposed

     
     
  #5418  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2016, 4:50 PM
Daveography's Avatar
Daveography Daveography is offline
Klatuu Barada Nikto
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Island of Misfit Architecture
Posts: 4,483
Rogers Place:



More here.
     
     
  #5419  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2016, 5:05 PM
Brizzy82 Brizzy82 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 615
Holy sh*t that Edmonton arena is moving fast.

Really jealous of that. MTS Centre is nice enough but I'd kill to have that thing dropped in on Portage Ave
     
     
  #5420  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2016, 5:24 PM
elly63 elly63 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankieFlowerpot View Post
Even this is infinitely better than what's currently proposed
New franchise for Saskatoon?

My issue with the Calgary design is the interior. I don't have a problem with the exterior or the clear dome. I believe they have some plan for ventilation so that it isn't hot like a greenhouse.

My issue is that it looks like a fieldhouse with telescoping seats and none at one end which doesn't look all that great.

Aside from us biased stadium hoes, what does the average Calgarian think of the design? I haven't seen much about that aside from the location, cost and cleanup. What do they think about the design?

Ken King and Co seem oblivious if people are saying they don't like it. (the design) They do say on their website that several designs are in the mix.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:39 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.