HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8621  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2016, 7:19 PM
vanlaw vanlaw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 667
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
This was very visible when coming back, as I had to wait an hour for my bag to arrive. There was a constant stream of luggage coming in, but it just took a while to have my bag arrive.
This is my biggest pet peeve with arriving back home at YVR. I've waited an hour after clearing immigration for bags from an LH flight on an A344. It was also close to an hour when we returned from HK on AC's 777HD a while back. I just dont understand how it can be so slow.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
One thing that I have not fully understood is why do people transiting at YVR have to pick up their luggage before boarding the next flight? Considering that it can indeed take close to an hour to get your bags, it may cause problems making the connecting flight! We had this happen to us in Toronto, when we were coming back from Chile and missed our connection due to this very reason.

What is the reason for having to pick up the bags? Why can't they be automatically transfered onto the next flight and all the border controls be done at the destination airport?

This is normally the custom everywhere in the world and for example in the US I don't have to do anything similar when transiting at any airport. It seems very complicated and time-wasting process for travelers choosing to transit in Canada, which doesn't work in our benefit IMO.
Probably as simple as the domestic flight would have to arrive at the international terminal at the destination airport. It just doesn't work. In the US, we clear before we get on the plane at YVR. If you transit through the US from a departure airport that doesn't pre-clear, you have to do the same - i.e. arriving at Seatac from Europe, you have to collect bags and clear customs then put your bag back on the belt as you do in Vancouver.

I’ve always wondered how Europe does it. You clear immigration at the entry airport, but you don’t get your bags then you essentially land "domestically" at the destination airport (assuming you landed initially at a Schengen airport and destination airport is within Schengen zone) and there is no customs clearance once you get your bags. I’ve never been able to figure that one out.
     
     
  #8622  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2016, 7:40 PM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanlaw View Post
I just dont understand how it can be so slow.
They do prioritize business class bags and also transit bags come first, which makes sense, provided that they are in the hurry. Only after this arrive the bags for those whose destination YVR is.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vanlaw View Post
In the US, we clear before we get on the plane at YVR.
I am writing this badly jetlagged, so maybe my brains are just running slow, but I don't remember clearing any customs when flying to the US from YVR. You check in, drop your bags at the conveyor belt and then go through the US immigration (not customs). Am I missing something here?

Quote:
Originally Posted by vanlaw View Post
If you transit through the US from a departure airport that doesn't pre-clear, you have to do the same - i.e. arriving at Seatac from Europe, you have to collect bags and clear customs then put your bag back on the belt as you do in Vancouver.
Didn't know that as I have not flown to Vancouver via US (trying to avoid that on purpose).

Quote:
Originally Posted by vanlaw View Post
I’ve always wondered how Europe does it.
At most European airports there is no separation between domestic or international terminal. It's all just one and you have the same process for both.

Most of the flights are also direct, but the few times I have had to transit in Germany and UK, I have never had to collect my bags before the next flight. Even when flying through LHR to YVR, one does not need to collect any bags. I encountered that for the first time here in North America.

And my pet peeve is not with immigration, but having to pick up my luggage upon transiting. I also don't see the point, as they can always security check bags behind the scene as much as they want. There should be no reason for passengers to do anything on their side.
     
     
  #8623  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2016, 10:26 PM
vanlaw vanlaw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 667
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
I am writing this badly jetlagged, so maybe my brains are just running slow, but I don't remember clearing any customs when flying to the US from YVR. You check in, drop your bags at the conveyor belt and then go through the US immigration (not customs). Am I missing something here?
Ok - I see what you are saying. In Vancouver, when you drop your bags on the belt before US security, I recall they scan your boarding pass, and then scan your bag tags, so when you go through US immigration they know how many you have checked. I guess if there was an issue and you get pulled for a secondary they could do a bag pull.
     
     
  #8624  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2016, 10:55 PM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,087
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanlaw View Post
Ok - I see what you are saying. In Vancouver, when you drop your bags on the belt before US security, I recall they scan your boarding pass, and then scan your bag tags, so when you go through US immigration they know how many you have checked. I guess if there was an issue and you get pulled for a secondary they could do a bag pull.
Yes, they'll do a bag pull if you gets into a secondary inspection. I had that once, checked in 3.5 hours early, and took them more than 1.5 hours to find my bag because they had to unload the entire plane in order to find mine as it was one of the very first to be loaded onto the plane.

Ended up delaying the flight so it missed the window before t-storm hitting SFO, which it delayed even more (and so I didn't miss the flight). 5.5 hours delay just for the stupid secondary inspection, pretty stupid IMO.
     
     
  #8625  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2016, 1:46 AM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,141
G.S MTL in the Canada section put together a great chart based off the numbers I put together (and his own for several other Canadian airports).

Same info but shows the brands so it's a lot more visually appealing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by G.S MTL View Post
YVR
     
     
  #8626  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2016, 4:53 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,047
Cool! Thanks, LeftCoaster!

PS/: Does Aeromexico to Mexico City not count? It's outside the USA, hence not "Transborder."

Last edited by trofirhen; Feb 27, 2016 at 7:16 AM.
     
     
  #8627  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2016, 6:31 AM
dharper dharper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: North Surrey
Posts: 287
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
One thing that I have not fully understood is why do people transiting at YVR have to pick up their luggage before boarding the next flight? Considering that it can indeed take close to an hour to get your bags, it may cause problems making the connecting flight! We had this happen to us in Toronto, when we were coming back from Chile and missed our connection due to this very reason.

What is the reason for having to pick up the bags? Why can't they be automatically transfered onto the next flight and all the border controls be done at the destination airport?

This is normally the custom everywhere in the world and for example in the US I don't have to do anything similar when transiting at any airport. It seems very complicated and time-wasting process for travelers choosing to transit in Canada, which doesn't work in our benefit IMO.
If I recall correctly, when I flew from SYD to YVR via LAX with Qantas/Alaska, at LAX, first I went through custom/immigration, claimed my bag, took it about 100 feet, then put it on another belt, walked to a different terminal for flight to YVR.
     
     
  #8628  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2016, 4:42 PM
connect2source's Avatar
connect2source connect2source is offline
life in the present
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Halifax
Posts: 1,879
Branding looks great LeftCoaster, looking forward to seeing KAL's 748's at YVR!.. only 39 in service worldwide so a rare sight!
__________________
source | energy
     
     
  #8629  
Old Posted Feb 29, 2016, 6:41 AM
Hot Rod's Avatar
Hot Rod Hot Rod is offline
Big City Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle-Vancouver-Osaka-Chongqing-Chicago-OKC
Posts: 1,187
Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen View Post
Cool! Thanks, LeftCoaster!

PS/: Does Aeromexico to Mexico City not count? It's outside the USA, hence not "Transborder."
Same continent though.

Nice to see those sexy foreign flags. Vancouver's so pretty! wink
     
     
  #8630  
Old Posted Feb 29, 2016, 8:09 PM
twoNeurons twoNeurons is offline
loafing in lotusland
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lotusland
Posts: 6,114
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanlaw View Post
Ok - I see what you are saying. In Vancouver, when you drop your bags on the belt before US security, I recall they scan your boarding pass, and then scan your bag tags, so when you go through US immigration they know how many you have checked. I guess if there was an issue and you get pulled for a secondary they could do a bag pull.
Someone clear this up for me... but aren't customs and immigration essentially the same thing for an air traveler to the USA?

I realize one technically deals with the importing of goods and one for the importation of people... but for all intents and purposes, you only deal with one person when flying into the US.

Doesn't YVR transborder status technically just put you in quasi-USA soil within the airport?
     
     
  #8631  
Old Posted Feb 29, 2016, 11:47 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,141
So who wants to talk about the January numbers that just came out??

Quote:
Originally Posted by craneSpotter View Post
Healthy growth for YVR to start 2016....January stats as follows:

Overall 1,625,104 passengers (+6.6% from Jan 2015 - 1,524,588)

Domestic 786,005 (+5.0%)
Transborder 406,107 (+0.1%)
International 432,992 (+16.9%)
Totally nuts growth in Intl'

17% is just astounding. A look at the details uncovers even more jems:
  • Europe up 11%
  • Misc Intl' up 15%
  • Scheduled Misc flights up 25.6%
  • Asia up 19%!

The Asia numbers just blow my mind. 19% on that big a number is just astounding, and there are so many more capacity increases yet to begin.

Transborder was a complete wiff, but 2016 is looking like it might be a BIG year.
     
     
  #8632  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 12:55 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,047
^Maybe time to think about getting on with the terminal expansion (option 3) that Craig Richmond pointed out in his speech some months back.

Also, whatever happened to TWV? It was "supposed" to be operational last spring.
Found this on it. It's still cooking. But exactly when it will come into effect is what I want to know. They speak of it as if it is iminent .... but is it?
https://news.gov.bc.ca/stories/yvr-travellers-increase-with-simplified-visa-free-transit-program#
(and if interested, click on "expand story")
     
     
  #8633  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 2:39 AM
Hot Rod's Avatar
Hot Rod Hot Rod is offline
Big City Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle-Vancouver-Osaka-Chongqing-Chicago-OKC
Posts: 1,187
I want to see the International Terminal chevron completed first, with hopefully at least 6-8 more widebody gates with at least 2 of them as A380 (wound't that give us 4 A380 gates in total, more than plenty).

I'd like to see hard construction on the Int'l Chevron immediately and planning for the T3 and taxiway crossway (is that the terminology) in the next year or two.

Expand Expand Expand - but be sure to Expand Int'l first.
     
     
  #8634  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 3:12 AM
casper's Avatar
casper casper is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 12,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot Rod View Post
I want to see the International Terminal chevron completed first, with hopefully at least 6-8 more widebody gates with at least 2 of them as A380 (wound't that give us 4 A380 gates in total, more than plenty).

I'd like to see hard construction on the Int'l Chevron immediately and planning for the T3 and taxiway crossway (is that the terminology) in the next year or two.

Expand Expand Expand - but be sure to Expand Int'l first.
I agree expanding International first makes the most sense. There are swing gates between domestic and international as well as swing gates between international and US. Expanding international means the swing gates can be used for their other purposes longer.

I am not certain I like that x-gate thing in the middle of the crossway runway. Toronto and Montreal both have one of these little infield terminals connected to the main terminal by an underground walkway. You go down and back up. It always feels like a long way out.

Come to think of it Geneva also has one (Air Canada use to operate out it). In there case it is round. Round circular terminals are neat. If we must have one of these I vote for it being round instead of a cross. Even the Swiss who have a think for crosses have a round in field terminal.
     
     
  #8635  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 4:58 AM
craneSpotter's Avatar
craneSpotter craneSpotter is offline
is watching.
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Greater Victoria
Posts: 3,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen View Post
Also, whatever happened to TWV? It was "supposed" to be operational last spring.
I found this government page regarding TWOV - http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/twov/travellers.asp. Looks like only nationals from Indonesia, Thailand, Taiwan and the Philippines qualify, and they also have to meet the following conditions:
  • They travel to Canada on an approved airline (either Air Canada, Air Canada Rouge, Air China, WestJet, Cathay Pacific, Philippines Airlines, China Southern, Jazz Air, Sky Regional Airlines Inc., and Air Georgian); and
  • They transit through an approved Canadian airport (either Vancouver International Airport or Toronto’s Pearson International Airport, Terminal 1 only). A change of terminal between flights in Toronto’s Pearson International Airport does not qualify as a condition of the TWOV program.

Wasn't the main goal of the program proponents to include Chinese nationals

Edit: whoops found this - the China Transit Program. Looks like Chinese nationals have a seperate program altogether.

http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/ctp/eligibility.asp
__________________
"compound interest is the 8th wonder of the world.."

Last edited by craneSpotter; Mar 1, 2016 at 6:24 AM.
     
     
  #8636  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 5:20 AM
craneSpotter's Avatar
craneSpotter craneSpotter is offline
is watching.
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Greater Victoria
Posts: 3,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post

The Asia numbers just blow my mind. 19% on that big a number is just astounding, and there are so many more capacity increases yet to begin.

Transborder was a complete wiff, but 2016 is looking like it might be a BIG year.
Yes indeed. If I have been following this thread close enough, I do believe there is some decent transborder and International flight (capacity/route) expansion happening this year @ YVR

February numbers should be great too, regular growth plus an extra day

so possible 2016 PAX numbers based on the following growth rates (2015=20,315,978):

+4% = 21,128,617

+5% = 21,331,777

+6% = 21,534,937

+7% = 21,738,097
__________________
"compound interest is the 8th wonder of the world.."

Last edited by craneSpotter; Mar 1, 2016 at 6:28 AM.
     
     
  #8637  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 5:43 AM
dharper dharper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: North Surrey
Posts: 287
I looking at the yvr.ca website yesterday, trying to find any information on the north south taxiway, or the next terminal expansion. The only thing I found on the website was a 20 year plan link, called yvr2027.ca. (Kind of dated) On this it had a time line that the north south taxiway was to be built in 2014, and the terminal expansion was to be built in 2015. Not sure if those were start or completion dates, but either way, they are behind the latest info I could find.
Does anyone have any idea when either of these project are to be started?
     
     
  #8638  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 6:11 AM
Johnny Aussie's Avatar
Johnny Aussie Johnny Aussie is offline
G'day
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 4,479
January stats... Wow. Exceeded my expectations.

100,000 more pax than Jan 15.

Transborder certainly ground to a halt. Tipping more US visitors still but offset by plummeting Canadian originating pax due to the $.

Compared to other Canadian cities reporting January (so far) Transborder is an excellent result.

But look at Asia, Europe and Misc Int'l. Amazing!
     
     
  #8639  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 6:53 AM
craneSpotter's Avatar
craneSpotter craneSpotter is offline
is watching.
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Greater Victoria
Posts: 3,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by dharper View Post
I looking at the yvr.ca website yesterday, trying to find any information on the north south taxiway, or the next terminal expansion. The only thing I found on the website was a 20 year plan link, called yvr2027.ca. (Kind of dated) On this it had a time line that the north south taxiway was to be built in 2014, and the terminal expansion was to be built in 2015. Not sure if those were start or completion dates, but either way, they are behind the latest info I could find.
Does anyone have any idea when either of these project are to be started?
As far as the next terminal expansion goes, the current plan - expansion 2020 - was to request approval to spend $400 million to add 5 gates to the International terminal and 5 gates to Pier A. Also, an older section of Pier B is to be renovated. They are hoping for approval by May 2016. After expansion 2020, they wish to spend ~1 billion+ on one of three expansion proposals - all outlined by this article :

https://www.biv.com/article/2015/11/critics-question-yvrs-400m-terminal-expansion-plan/
__________________
"compound interest is the 8th wonder of the world.."

Last edited by craneSpotter; Mar 1, 2016 at 7:13 AM.
     
     
  #8640  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 5:09 PM
Cage Cage is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: YYC
Posts: 2,748
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
One thing that I have not fully understood is why do people transiting at YVR have to pick up their luggage before boarding the next flight? Considering that it can indeed take close to an hour to get your bags, it may cause problems making the connecting flight! We had this happen to us in Toronto, when we were coming back from Chile and missed our connection due to this very reason.

What is the reason for having to pick up the bags? Why can't they be automatically transfered onto the next flight and all the border controls be done at the destination airport?

This is normally the custom everywhere in the world and for example in the US I don't have to do anything similar when transiting at any airport. It seems very complicated and time-wasting process for travelers choosing to transit in Canada, which doesn't work in our benefit IMO.
Pax having to pick up their bags to go through Customs and Immigration inspection is a CBSA or USCBP requirement. The customs people want you to identify and collect your bags so that they can assess duties and see if you are over the exemption limit for importing personal items.

In both Canada and USA, personal exemption limits only apply to bags that are dragged across the border by the respective individual. Items that sent via courier have zero personal exemption limit. In order to apply this legal standard, the traveler must personally import the items.

The 1 hour delay in getting your bags off the international flight is also a CBSA or USCBP thing. Watch the Border Security: Protecting America's Border TV program on Global. The American version gives a much better description of the behind the scenes bag inspection that is conducted by the Customs people. The Canadian's do similar amount of behind the scenes inspection, however nothing is ever disclosed publicly.

For example it is not uncommon for CBSA to require all bags off a specific flight be lined up and then inspected by canine. Once the dog does their sniff test the bags can be released onto the belt. this adds time as all bags must be offloaded, then canine does their job, followed by all cleared bags being released at the same time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vanlaw View Post
This is my biggest pet peeve with arriving back home at YVR. I've waited an hour after clearing immigration for bags from an LH flight on an A344. It was also close to an hour when we returned from HK on AC's 777HD a while back. I just dont understand how it can be so slow.
See above for the unseen hand of the government wanting to do all kinds of inspection behind the scenes.

From a HKG perspective, its a hot source country for both drug and agricultural items. This requires the use of either canine or xray technology, either method is time consuming.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vanlaw View Post
I’ve always wondered how Europe does it. You clear immigration at the entry airport, but you don’t get your bags then you essentially land "domestically" at the destination airport (assuming you landed initially at a Schengen airport and destination airport is within Schengen zone) and there is no customs clearance once you get your bags. I’ve never been able to figure that one out.
The difference between Canada/USA/Australia and Europe/Certain Asia Countries is that Customs laws have much high personal exemptions in the latter countries.

Example, buddy was transporting computer servers into an Asian country and upon claiming his luggage proceeded through the "red lane" to pay customs bill that was estimated to be $10,000 CAD. The officer took a quick look and told my buddy to proceed on through. In Canada or the USA, duties of $10 get flagged for immediate payment.

In Europe, your personal exemption is in thousands of dollars and there are few quantity exemptions. In Canada there is very low personal exemption for under 72 hour excursions plus many items have quantity limits (e.g. cannot import more than 20lbs of cheese).

Quote:
Originally Posted by twoNeurons View Post
Someone clear this up for me... but aren't customs and immigration essentially the same thing for an air traveler to the USA?

I realize one technically deals with the importing of goods and one for the importation of people... but for all intents and purposes, you only deal with one person when flying into the US.
Customs and immigration are very different from a legal perspective. For entering Canada, Canadian citizens have mobility rights under section 6 of Charter of Rights and Freedoms, contents have no similar provisions.

From a primary inspection line perspective in both CBSA and USCBP world, the officer is one person. However if there is any issue on either customs or immigration perspective, the traveler is sent to secondary inspection where the officers are specialized into either immigration officer or customs officer.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:26 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.