HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8781  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2016, 11:02 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by Echoes View Post
Famed architect to attend opening of Gordon Oakes Red Bear Student Centre

Chris Morin, Saskatoon StarPhoenix
Published on: February 3, 2016 | Last Updated: February 3, 2016 7:40 AM CST





http://thestarphoenix.com/news/local-new...g-of-gordon-oakes-redbear-student-centre
Nice but will Cardinal ever do something different? He has been riding this theme for decades.
     
     
  #8782  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2016, 2:48 PM
scotty c scotty c is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 205
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
Nice but will Cardinal ever do something different? He has been riding this theme for decades.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Just keep cashing the cheques.
     
     
  #8783  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2016, 5:51 PM
Jezza's Avatar
Jezza Jezza is offline
Saskatoon
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 84
I wouldn't really call it a theme, more his signature style. But I don't disagree, I'd love to see how other Indigenous architects would interpret a space.
     
     
  #8784  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2016, 3:11 PM
saskatoonborn saskatoonborn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 297
Anyone know why they only took down one section of remaining bridge and no the rest?
     
     
  #8785  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2016, 8:44 PM
Roquentin Roquentin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 271
Gordon Oakes Red Bear Centre looks fine from the road, but the side that faces the rest of the campus is very disappointing - it's bleak and uninviting. As well, the building is too small to satisfy anything more than a symbolic need. I can't be a supporter of this one; it just strikes me as a misuse of university resources.
     
     
  #8786  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2016, 5:34 AM
skSK's Avatar
skSK skSK is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by saskatoonborn View Post
Anyone know why they only took down one section of remaining bridge and no the rest?
They couldn't take it down without building another berm under the last span, but that would dam the river. As I understand it, the berms are being used to help the refurbishment of the piers. I would expect once this is done to one side, they'd remove the berm, construct one under the last span, and demolish it then.
     
     
  #8787  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2016, 7:08 AM
Irvin Irvin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 134
Housing starts for Jan / 2016

Saskatoon had 67 single family and 73 multiple starts for a total of 140

Regina had a total of 57 starts
     
     
  #8788  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2016, 6:56 PM
casper's Avatar
casper casper is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 12,946
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roquentin View Post
Gordon Oakes Red Bear Centre looks fine from the road, but the side that faces the rest of the campus is very disappointing - it's bleak and uninviting. As well, the building is too small to satisfy anything more than a symbolic need. I can't be a supporter of this one; it just strikes me as a misuse of university resources.
I think the size is appropriate especially given its close proximity to other buildings that serve a complimentary function. It provides some study space for students and a large public area to hold special events. It is symbolic in trying to show the university is inclusive of the different ethnic groups within the province. That is very positive and quite consistent with how the UfoS has small one off building that try to build connection to different religious faiths in the province.
     
     
  #8789  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2016, 11:45 PM
EpicPonyTime's Avatar
EpicPonyTime EpicPonyTime is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Yellowfork
Posts: 1,168
For those interested in the development of the P4G regional growth plans, just a reminder that they are revealing their proposal tomorrow at Wanuskewin during two town houses at 1-4 and 5-8. I'm excited to see what they came up with!

https://www.saskatoon.ca/business-develo...g/saskatoon-north-partnership-growth-p4g
     
     
  #8790  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 1:41 AM
The S'toon Goon The S'toon Goon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 296
I had a chance to drive by elementary schools under construction in both Evergreen and the Hamptons. Maybe I am just easily impressed, but there seems to be a fair bit accomplished already!
     
     
  #8791  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 4:45 PM
prairieguy prairieguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,572
If you have not been by the Meridian Project in Stonebridge, that is also an impressive project in scope and function. It is a 'seniors' project that I believe allows residents to move from total self contained condo units to assisted living to lower level care home. The condo portion of project provides some nice size windows and balconies for residents.

This entire area of Stonebridge (at the end of Preston Ave) has really developed and continues to develop. I assume the large structure that is to the point of steel frames is the new school?
     
     
  #8792  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 12:01 AM
scrolling scrolling is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by EpicPonyTime View Post
For those interested in the development of the P4G regional growth plans, just a reminder that they are revealing their proposal tomorrow at Wanuskewin during two town houses at 1-4 and 5-8. I'm excited to see what they came up with!

https://www.saskatoon.ca/business-develo...g/saskatoon-north-partnership-growth-p4g
Interesting. The locations of the mixed use nodes seem arbitrary.



Source https://twitter.com/MCraigGlobal
     
     
  #8793  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 2:37 PM
nook nook is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 347
So the Sasktel Centre is 28 years old as of yesterday. It's a popular arena in Canada, but what's the shelf life on an arena? Concourses are tiny. Washroom facilities are lacking, and I don't think that can be reasonably upgraded without an astronomical price tag.

I'm not saying we need a new facility... But should we start thinking about one yet?

The next arena we build needs to be more centrally located though. Maybe once we figure out how to get the damn rail yards out of the city...
     
     
  #8794  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 3:02 PM
SkydivePilot SkydivePilot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: REGINA
Posts: 2,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by nook View Post
So the Sasktel Centre is 28 years old as of yesterday. It's a popular arena in Canada, but what's the shelf life on an arena? Concourses are tiny. Washroom facilities are lacking, and I don't think that can be reasonably upgraded without an astronomical price tag.

I'm not saying we need a new facility... But should we start thinking about one yet?

The next arena we build needs to be more centrally located though. Maybe once we figure out how to get the damn rail yards out of the city...
SaskTel Centre is certainly maxxed-out alright; however, if there is to be provincial funding for such a facility, I'd say Regina would be the next recipient for that. Regina's 39-year-old Brandt Centre [officially] holds about 6200 people, lol! (Versus SaskTel Centre's 15,200)

SaskTel Centre will be fine for a long time to come.
     
     
  #8795  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2016, 5:41 AM
nook nook is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 347
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkydivePilot View Post
SaskTel Centre is certainly maxxed-out alright; however, if there is to be provincial funding for such a facility, I'd say Regina would be the next recipient for that. Regina's 39-year-old Brandt Centre [officially] holds about 6200 people, lol! (Versus SaskTel Centre's 15,200)

SaskTel Centre will be fine for a long time to come.
You guys are already getting funding for some type of stadium.

Or so I hear everyone say.
     
     
  #8796  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2016, 2:58 PM
SkydivePilot SkydivePilot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: REGINA
Posts: 2,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by nook View Post
You guys are already getting funding for some type of stadium.

Or so I hear everyone say.
One cannot compare 'stadiums' to 'arenas.' (Apples and oranges) Regina's Brant Centre could easily be expanded via by merely popping its [ugly] tin roof --- and I'd say with relatively little cost. A new arena for Saskatoon would be very $$$. (Unless one talks about Quebec City - where $$$ grows on trees. Lol!)
     
     
  #8797  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2016, 3:10 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkydivePilot View Post
One cannot compare 'stadiums' to 'arenas.' (Apples and oranges) Regina's Brant Centre could easily be expanded via by merely popping its [ugly] tin roof --- and I'd say with relatively little cost. A new arena for Saskatoon would be very $$$. (Unless one talks about Quebec City - where $$$ grows on trees. Lol!)
I do not want to get too off topic here but I do not think even Regina needs a new arena right now, especially in this economy. Maybe in 15 years. The Brandt Centre is the perfect size for the Pats and 90% of the other events. Some of the remaining 10% can be accommodated at New Mosaic and the rest, well I guess they will be at the SaskTel Centre. It is just not worth $200 million to accommodate a few extra big concerts or events per year.
     
     
  #8798  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2016, 7:36 PM
Brutopian Brutopian is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrolling View Post
Interesting. The locations of the mixed use nodes seem arbitrary.



Source https://twitter.com/MCraigGlobal
At least they used an up-to-date map of Saskatoon, that shows the new South Çircle Freeway and Bridge.
     
     
  #8799  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2016, 9:57 PM
scrolling scrolling is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutopian View Post
At least they used an up-to-date map of Saskatoon, that shows the new South Çircle Freeway and Bridge.
Huh, I did not even notice that

The maps and other content are now available online and the South Bridge is still missing.

http://www.partnershipforgrowth.ca/contribute

There is an interactive map in that link where you can leave comments.
     
     
  #8800  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2016, 10:57 PM
Brutopian Brutopian is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrolling View Post
Huh, I did not even notice that

The maps and other content are now available online and the South Bridge is still missing.

http://www.partnershipforgrowth.ca/contribute

There is an interactive map in that link where you can leave comments.
Yeah, not sure what the rationale was for using an outdated map of Saskatoon. Nevertheless, it is interesting to see from this plan how easily Martensville and Warman could merge into one city in the future.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:19 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.