HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #481  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2016, 3:28 AM
BodomReaper BodomReaper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 987
So sick of these wedding cake designs mandated by the city. Especially on a street like Cambie, what the hell is setting-back the top 2 floors by a meter going to achieve other than stultifying design uniformity?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #482  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2016, 4:27 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,178
Quote:
Originally Posted by BodomReaper View Post
So sick of these wedding cake designs mandated by the city. Especially on a street like Cambie, what the hell is setting-back the top 2 floors by a meter going to achieve other than stultifying design uniformity?
"Vancouverism." Duh.

/sarcasm
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #483  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2016, 9:50 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,782
More of Cambria from YF:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellow Fever View Post
Mosic, I suppose its the tallest wood made condo in Vancouver..

20160117_123248 by Yellow Fever @ SkyscraperCity, on Flickr

20160117_123156 by Yellow Fever @ SkyscraperCity, on Flickr
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellow Fever View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellow Fever View Post
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #484  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2016, 11:55 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 28,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by quobobo View Post
^You sure? There are a lot of younger people in the chunk of Marpole with lowrise apartment buildings: http://generationedcity.uwaterloo.ca/2014/10/16/where-do-young-adults-live/lq_webmaps_vancouver_v4/
As a belated aside, that map is a pretty damning indictment of how young adults have been driven out of the West Side of Vancouver by affordability issues.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #485  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2016, 11:58 PM
csbvan's Avatar
csbvan csbvan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,341
Which explains why the west side is becoming devoid of anything interesting, or any character.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #486  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2016, 1:11 AM
quobobo quobobo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
As a belated aside, that map is a pretty damning indictment of how young adults have been driven out of the West Side of Vancouver by affordability issues.
Yes. Desirable residential neighbourhoods + policy that explicitly limits additional housing supply = sky-high prices.

(As a former UBC student who had a long commute from East Van, I'm a little bitter)

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #487  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2016, 5:27 AM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,711
I'd love to see that zoning map for all of Metro Van.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #488  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 9:53 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,782
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #489  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 10:52 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,161
I like the tower, but its interaction with the corner is a problem. This is a major intersection, it shouldn't wall itself off from the corner.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #490  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 10:57 PM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,330
Intersection of two major roads, across the street from a rapid transit station....no retail at grade, of course.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #491  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2016, 12:03 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jebby View Post
Intersection of two major roads, across the street from a rapid transit station....no retail at grade, of course.
Retail works best in groups, and there's nothing on that block (or that intersection) except trees and housing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #492  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2016, 12:14 AM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,429
The corner of that building is a let down. And what's with that massive set back from Cambie.

Also, Doesn't seem like a lot of social housing going in along Cambie
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #493  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2016, 12:23 AM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
Retail works best in groups, and there's nothing on that block (or that intersection) except trees and housing.
Well first, Two of the four corners of that intersection has commercial/retail

The main drawback is that it's walled off and hugely set back from the street. Even if there's no retail the building could interact better with the street
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #494  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2016, 12:36 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,782
My guess is that the City wanted to preserve the "park-like" outlook towards the south since that is the start of the Cambie "Heritage" Boulevard.

The real test will be whether retail fills in the blocks north of 24th up to 19th or 20th.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #495  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2016, 12:47 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,178
Quote:
Originally Posted by osirisboy View Post
Well first, Two of the four corners of that intersection has commercial/retail

The main drawback is that it's walled off and hugely set back from the street. Even if there's no retail the building could interact better with the street
Technically just the NE corner, and it's one carpet store.

Point I'm trying to make is that since South Cambie fizzles out long before it gets to King Edward - and very few people are going to cross the street from the station to get to one shop/cafe - they might as well make it all-residential and fade it into the rest of the housing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #496  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2016, 1:17 AM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
Technically just the NE corner, and it's one carpet store.

Point I'm trying to make is that since South Cambie fizzles out long before it gets to King Edward - and very few people are going to cross the street from the station to get to one shop/cafe - they might as well make it all-residential and fade it into the rest of the housing.
My point is two of the four corners are much more than trees and houses

Like I said. They don't have to add retail here. Even making the building interact with the street better. Putting the lobby the manitou space etc facing towards the street would be better than this
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #497  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2016, 1:43 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,782
I suspect that the wall facing King Edward is in response to the grade of the site. It looks like they've established ground level at the south end of the site, so at the north end of the site, the underground box for the garage will be five (!) feet above the sidewalk.
That probably also serves to prevent passersby from easily looking into the ground floor units.

I guess alternatives would have had half a floor of units (and lobby) at grade facing King Edward (with storage or parking uses built into the grade to the south). They may not have wanted the building entrance to be near the bus stop.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #498  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2016, 1:48 AM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 28,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by osirisboy View Post
Well first, Two of the four corners of that intersection has commercial/retail

The main drawback is that it's walled off and hugely set back from the street. Even if there's no retail the building could interact better with the street
That's true, but they are on the north side of King Ed. It makes sense to enhance the existing Cambie Village retail by filling in to the north, rather than south. The last thing we need is yet another dreary miles long strip of streetcar retail. Vancover has too much of that already.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #499  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2016, 3:38 AM
squeezied's Avatar
squeezied squeezied is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,625
Quote:
Originally Posted by osirisboy View Post
Well first, Two of the four corners of that intersection has commercial/retail

The main drawback is that it's walled off and hugely set back from the street. Even if there's no retail the building could interact better with the street
The setback was always there. It's city land, no developer can build on it. Private property begins inside of the sidewalk.

See google maps: https://www.google.ca/maps/@49.2483555,-123.115703,166m/data=!3m1!1e3

This is at the start of the boulevard where it's at its narrowest point, correspondingly the setbacks (at both sides of the street) are at its widest point.

The interaction with the street could be better. But as officedweller has stated, they've established ground level at the south end of the site, thereby elevating the building at the north end. The reason why the elevation of the building can't be substantially lowered is due to the neighbouring site to the south. The parking ramp of the neighbouring site will be shared with this development which essentially determines the P1 elevation and every other floor elevation as well. As a result, the ground floor elevation at the north end is about 9ft above the sidewalk on King Ed, which unfortunately makes a wall the most practical solution. If the landscaping fronting the wall is attractive enough it could turn out quite well. I've never been disappointed with projects from Arno Matis so I'll wait and see how it turns out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #500  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2016, 3:59 AM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,330
Whatever happened to the plan to building something on top of the King Ed station?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:30 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.