HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1241  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2016, 8:21 PM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
Gold house is one tower.
I thought it was two towers?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1242  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2016, 10:46 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,479
It is two towers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1243  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 3:39 AM
VarBreStr18 VarBreStr18 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
Gold house is one tower. It is still sold out because there is a mall and skytrain just right across the street. Doesn't matter if retail tenants are announced. When investors know there will be retail and future convenience for future residential tenants, they will buy.
Goldhouse is very similar to T3, comparable price range. Both very near sky train station and close to mall. Goldhouse sold out faster than T3... difference is Goldhouse has known retails. T3 retaila is still a mystery.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1244  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 3:53 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,387
Isn't Gold House also something like 20 storeys shorter than Brentwood3?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1245  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 5:00 AM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
Isn't Gold House also something like 20 storeys shorter than Brentwood3?
IIRC, it's one 41 story tower and a 28 story tower.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1246  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 5:37 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,387
But are they both sold out already? I thought they were phased?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1247  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 10:30 AM
urbancanadian urbancanadian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 713
It was posted on here that both were sold out. Also, Jebby is right about the floor counts.

And I doubt that which retail is known had much impact. It's one tiny factor that goes into buying a half-million dollar home, not to mention the differences between the markets in each area. If I'm buying, I don't care if there's a Zara at my doorstep. I care if there are some restaurants/a grocery store/drug store/cafes/etc - but not usually a specific store. Metrotown and Brentwood are both in the suburbs, so you're not likely to get the funky shops you'd find on Main or Commercial or 4th or whatever.

Also, many (most?) landlords don't announce their retail lineup until fairly close to opening, so that they can get people hyped, and not have that wear off...

And I doubt they even have that many tenants locked in yet, so far out. Especially the big, international brands.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1248  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 7:04 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by VarBreStr18 View Post
Goldhouse is very similar to T3, comparable price range. Both very near sky train station and close to mall. Goldhouse sold out faster than T3... difference is Goldhouse has known retails. T3 retaila is still a mystery.
However Brentwood is a way bigger project, with towers 50 stories or higher. Towers 1 & 2 were sold out despite not having retail tenants announced, and now T3 is almost sold out. My original point was that developers use different strategies to lure investors, and announcing retail tenants is not necessary to do the job. Then dreambrother808 had to come in and derail what I said. Goldhouse sold out BECAUSE of the convenience of Metrotown/Station Square malls, and not because of what's going into the little shops downstairs. Put Gold House at Patterson, Royal Oak, or Edmonds Station neighbourhoods with the same retail tenants and we're all pretty sure their sales wouldn't be as spectacular.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jebby View Post
I thought it was two towers?
It is, but we were talking about launched towers that are sold out. Their ads also say "over 90% sold". But that's not the point of the original conversation.

Last edited by Vin; Feb 9, 2016 at 7:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1249  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 1:24 AM
missbailey missbailey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 39
I was in the sales center on the weekend and talked to one of the sales guys for a while.

What I got out it (BS or not)
-over 250 stores that would put it in the ranks of Pacific Center and Park Royal
-similar style of eating places and shops like the Hamilton/Mainland area in Yaletown
-2 (or maybe 3, I can't remember) high end anchor stores. I asked which ones and he almost slipped up and started to tell me then bit his tongue, and told me that he wasn't allowed to say
-Earls and the Keg are confirmed tenants

And I also found out the mystery of why level 58 was eliminated from floor numbering in towers 1 and 2. Apparently the 5 sounds like 'no' in Cantonese and 8 means money, hence 'no money'
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1250  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 3:40 AM
VarBreStr18 VarBreStr18 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by missbailey View Post
I was in the sales center on the weekend and talked to one of the sales guys for a while.

What I got out it (BS or not)
-over 250 stores that would put it in the ranks of Pacific Center and Park Royal
-similar style of eating places and shops like the Hamilton/Mainland area in Yaletown
-2 (or maybe 3, I can't remember) high end anchor stores. I asked which ones and he almost slipped up and started to tell me then bit his tongue, and told me that he wasn't allowed to say
-Earls and the Keg are confirmed tenants

And I also found out the mystery of why level 58 was eliminated from floor numbering in towers 1 and 2. Apparently the 5 sounds like 'no' in Cantonese and 8 means money, hence 'no money'
Keg a confirmed tenant? Is n't there a Keg somewhere very close to Costco?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1251  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 3:50 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,387
Yep, right next to Highway 1 on Willingdon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1252  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 3:51 AM
missbailey missbailey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by VarBreStr18 View Post
Keg a confirmed tenant? Is n't there a Keg somewhere very close to Costco?
I questioned him about that, since the Keg down the street is fairly new, and he just said Keg wants in.

He didn't say anything about the other Keg closing down or not, but did say that the Earls nearby would close.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1253  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 3:52 AM
VarBreStr18 VarBreStr18 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
However Brentwood is a way bigger project, with towers 50 stories or higher. Towers 1 & 2 were sold out despite not having retail tenants announced, and now T3 is almost sold out. My original point was that developers use different strategies to lure investors, and announcing retail tenants is not necessary to do the job. Then dreambrother808 had to come in and derail what I said. Goldhouse sold out BECAUSE of the convenience of Metrotown/Station Square malls, and not because of what's going into the little shops downstairs. Put Gold House at Patterson, Royal Oak, or Edmonds Station neighbourhoods with the same retail tenants and we're all pretty sure their sales wouldn't be as spectacular.



It is, but we were talking about launched towers that are sold out. Their ads also say "over 90% sold". But that's not the point of the original conversation.
I am surprised that Goldhouse sold out before T3 and i dont mean Goldhouse has known little retails. I mean the bigger drawing power of bigger retails, such as Price Smart, T&T, Bed and Bath etc.
When Marine Gateway was launched, it was in a more or less in no man's land. No one would anticipate that kind of success, had they not announced T &T and a movie theater at the presale. Similarly had T3 announced some major anchor, it would have sold out before Goldhouse.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1254  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 4:40 PM
VarBreStr18 VarBreStr18 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by VarBreStr18 View Post
I am surprised that Goldhouse sold out before T3 and i dont mean Goldhouse has known little retails. I mean the bigger drawing power of bigger retails, such as Price Smart, T&T, Bed and Bath etc.
When Marine Gateway was launched, it was in a more or less in no man's land. No one would anticipate that kind of success, had they not announced T &T and a movie theater at the presale. Similarly had T3 announced some major anchor, it would have sold out before Goldhouse.
Because buyers who were deciding to buy Goldhouse or T3 would have swayed to T3
Because IMHO T3 is a far better location than Goldhouse in the long terrm: quicker access to Costo,SFU, BCIT, potential direct access to UBC with Millenium line extension. north facing higher units has potential for years of unobstructed view because established single family neighbourhood in northern boundary (vs rental units waiting to be redeveloped). Master planned project means you wont see yet a taller building popping in the north side of T3 by another developer.
I just do not want to see T3 beaten by Goldhouse. Btw I do not work for Brentwood, I am just ordinary guy very interested in real estate, and I am not a realtor.
I better stop before the forum regulator red tag me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1255  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 6:15 PM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,330
Almost sold out

Quote:
Originally Posted by AudiA3 View Post
90% sold
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1256  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 6:18 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,478
Well we can see which floorplans are unpopular... thanks for the update.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1257  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 8:48 PM
TourOdeon's Avatar
TourOdeon TourOdeon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 225
The penthouses are pretty unpopular
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1258  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 11:51 PM
Spr0ckets Spr0ckets is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by missbailey View Post
I was in the sales center on the weekend and talked to one of the sales guys for a while.

What I got out it (BS or not)
-over 250 stores that would put it in the ranks of Pacific Center and Park Royal
-similar style of eating places and shops like the Hamilton/Mainland area in Yaletown
-2 (or maybe 3, I can't remember) high end anchor stores. I asked which ones and he almost slipped up and started to tell me then bit his tongue, and told me that he wasn't allowed to say
-Earls and the Keg are confirmed tenants

And I also found out the mystery of why level 58 was eliminated from floor numbering in towers 1 and 2. Apparently the 5 sounds like 'no' in Cantonese and 8 means money, hence 'no money'

I really hope Burnaby eventually comes down on this nonsense and puts a stop to it the way Vancouver recently did for their new projects.

I understand cultural relativism and all that, but the irony (and some would say lack of self-awareness) of wanting to live in a high-end MODERN high-rise building while still buying into traditional capricious superstitious beliefs like that is sometimes pretty mind-boggling.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1259  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2016, 12:08 AM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,119
Burnaby has already incorporated new numbering bylaws which prohibit exactly that kind of nonsense.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1260  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2016, 1:42 AM
missbailey missbailey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spr0ckets View Post
I really hope Burnaby eventually comes down on this nonsense and puts a stop to it the way Vancouver recently did for their new projects.

I understand cultural relativism and all that, but the irony (and some would say lack of self-awareness) of wanting to live in a high-end MODERN high-rise building while still buying into traditional capricious superstitious beliefs like that is sometimes pretty mind-boggling.
Towers 1 and 2 fall under the old rules and have eliminated floors.

Tower 3 includes all floors.

I got word today that Coquitlam is also following suit and not allowing floors to be skipped anymore either.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:38 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.