Quote:
Originally Posted by relnahe
I don't know how anyone with interest in urban design would want another large soul sucking stadium that will only be used sparingly. Should have some sort of high density mixed used project in that location.
|
Kenney's statement was rather belligerent (please don't be a DiBlasio-esque obnoxious ideologue, Mr. Mayor-Elect) and didn't seem to address the substance of the matter. I don't have a dog in the Temple Stadium fight, but it's hard to argue with the better articulated objections to spending a ton on a very limited use venue. It got me thinking of a colossal project going on at my undergraduate Alma Mater, Notre Dame, called "Campus Crossroads."
http://crossroads.nd.edu. It involves adding substantial academic and student services structures to three sides of the existing stadium.
ND is in a much more bucolic setting and is mostly low-rise, with a few notable exceptions. There's plenty of room for expansion and infill. Therefore I'm agnostic at best about the wisdom and expense of glomming mid-rise bulky structures onto the stadium (which some have cynically likened to the rise of Isengard). There's no doubt that being able to add heretofore-unknown-at-ND premium seating is not coincidental. However, building something from scratch that integrated various non-athletic functions (along with the field) on the proposed stadium parcel might be just the ticket for Temple.