Quote:
Originally Posted by hipster duck
If anything, I think that Toronto's built form is even more underwhelming than Chicago's. It might be less dense owing to the fact that Chicago is a bit more depopulated and Toronto has more postwar apartment towers, but you don't have to go very far from King and Bay to get into residential areas of semi-detached homes with yards. In New York, you have to travel 10 miles out on the subway to extreme southern Brooklyn or eastern Queens to get neighbourhoods that are built the same way as, say, Gerrard and Sherbourne.
Millions of New Yorkers live in prewar tenement buildings that are 5-6 storeys tall and come right up to the sidewalk. The number of Torontonians who live in similar building types is approximately zero.
|
Toronto's built form is underwhelming in the same way LA's built form is underwhelming. Toronto and LA are both cities of impressive neighborhoods and former boroughs: NYCC - Century City, St Andrews/Windfields -Beverly Hills, CBD - CBD, Hollywood - Yorkville, East Los Angeles - Dufferin/Caledonia Road, Main/Gerrard - Bunker Hill
From a proud Torontonian's perspective, Toronto's downtown is underwhelming even by Canadian standards (save for the densification and new condo development) Union station redevelopment is a step in the right direction of promoting a Chicago-quality public realm.
Toronto is NOT a centralized city. It's truly a city of neighborhoods and dosent get the recognition it deserves for this. A lot of people from outside the city (mostly other Canadians) cant see past its wall of crappy spandrel condos on the waterfront. But if they havent spent time traveling throughout the city, I dont blame them for this misconception.