HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3761  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2015, 5:26 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spring2008 View Post
To me TO looks really close to Chicago in terms of density already and the much higher recent construction activity will continue to benefit TO. I do agree about the inferior overall quality, though not 100% sold that TO needs supertalls in order to match, but supertalls are unavoidably coming to TO regardless.

As of last yr, TO had the third highest office space u/c in North America just ahead of Cgy and the most new condo sales ahead of NY. I believe the condo market has even accelerated even more this yr. There's definitely demand on both sides if the city starts approving.
Chicago's core skyline is still much bigger in every sense. High rise development in Toronto is spread out to nearly every corner of the city. In Chicago, it's concentrated to a few neighborhoods. It wouldn't take much for Chicago to begin to widen that distance once again.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3762  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2015, 5:40 PM
Spring2008 Spring2008 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lower Mount Royal, Calgary
Posts: 5,147
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post

Chicago's core skyline is still much bigger in every sense. High rise development in Toronto is spread out to nearly every corner of the city. In Chicago, it's concentrated to a few neighborhoods. It wouldn't take much for Chicago to begin to widen that distance once again.
I guess it pays off having a big head start. Willis Tower alone 4.5M SF lol ridiculous. We don't have anything even close to that in cdn.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3763  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2015, 6:09 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post

Chicago's core skyline is still much bigger in every sense. High rise development in Toronto is spread out to nearly every corner of the city. In Chicago, it's concentrated to a few neighborhoods. It wouldn't take much for Chicago to begin to widen that distance once again.
True, but in a couple decades the gaps between Toronto's nodes will be much smaller and it'll be dang near impossible to have a clear cut off. It'll just be an endless sea, which Chicago wouldn't be close to.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3764  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2015, 6:29 PM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is online now
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 11,335
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
Well, I thought this conversation was about residential build form. My interest lies with the glorification of the rowhouse on SSP. My post already answered your questions. Not sure how single useage neighborhoods , twisting cul de sac development and, roadside parking restrictions are strictly about car dependancy. It certainly is a product of this form of community planning.

LA is dense. I don't find it particular urban though. Walk ability is pretty bad overall
I guess what it comes down to is that concepts like urban and suburban rely on a combination of different elements, and that having one urban element in an otherwise suburban area doesn't make it urban, and having one suburban element in an otherwise urban area doesn't make it suburban.
__________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw
Don't ask people not to debate a topic. Just stop making debatable assertions. Problem solved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3765  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2015, 12:33 AM
MonkeyRonin's Avatar
MonkeyRonin MonkeyRonin is offline
¥ ¥ ¥
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 10,655
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Mtl View Post
But that looks more suburban than anything else. To my eyes, it even feels empty and desolate, not a urban lover's walking experience. So it valides the point Beedok was making. The rows of triplexes tightly packed on much narrower streets feel a lot more urban to me and gives the city a much more denser feel, a more enclosing sentiment. I don't envy the kind of streetscapes pictured above.

It is suburban - but when you get 10km out of the core of Montreal it looks more like, well, this: (though, so too does much of Toronto)




And that area actually is pretty urban for a post-war suburb - high population density, lot of pedestrian traffic, good assortment of businesses & amenities, generally vibrant. My point was that even if its pre-war built form is more modest; dense, urban(ish) areas like that spread out much further in Toronto due to modern infill.



Quote:
I don't have absolute proof about Montreal's streets being narrower in general than Toronto's, but it's a feeling I have time and time again when I visit your city. Downtown Montreal really has only ONE very large street (René-Lévesque) and the occasional bits here and there, very short, like Union between Sherbrooke and Ste-Catherine. Otherwise, all the streets are much narrower, and that is without mentioning Le Plateau, an extension of the downtown core where the streets are narrow, and Old Montreal too, of course. Once again, no proof,no scientific studies, but it's something that I notice everytime I'm in Toronto. In general, Montreal feels more compact than Toronto, smaller, but more tightly build. I don't think it's a value judgement, it is what it is, and both cities have their own urban merits. They are simply not build the exact same way.

Selective bias is all I that can attribute that to, aside from the very narrow streets of the Old Port.


Typical 19th-century inner-city commercial street in Montreal:




Typical 19th-century inner-city commercial street in Toronto:




Typical 19th-century inner-city residential street in Montreal:




Typical 19th-century inner-city residential street in Toronto:




Typical early 20-century outer-city commercial street in Montreal:




Typical early 20-century outer-city commercial street in Toronto:




Typical early 20-century outer-city residential street in Montreal:




Typical early 20-century outer-city residential street in Toronto:





Road widths all look pretty comparable to me. Wide boulevards like Rene Levesque or University Ave. are the exception in either city.
__________________
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3766  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2015, 4:02 AM
rousseau's Avatar
rousseau rousseau is offline
Registered Drug User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 8,216
I think the streets you've shown are all comparable, but then Montreal has the narrow streets of the Plateau that have no analogue in Toronto.

Okay, well, the streets in the Plateau themselves might be around the same width as in the West End in Toronto, but the solid wall of walkup housing in the Plateau fronts directly onto the sidewalk without any setbacks, making it feel a whole lot narrower. As per your comparison here:

Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyRonin View Post
Typical 19th-century inner-city residential street in Montreal:




Typical 19th-century inner-city residential street in Toronto:

When you walk around the Plateau it really does feel significantly narrower and denser than anywhere in Toronto.

Though I don't think Cabbagetown is really quite so representative of what you're likely to find in Toronto anyway. A better photo to hold up against Montreal's large stock of 19th century housing on the Plateau would have been from the long streets west of Bathurst running from Queen up to Bloor and beyond. That patch of real estate is more comparable in size to the Plateau. It feels distinctly wider and airier due to the setbacks from the sidewalks.

Last edited by rousseau; Oct 18, 2015 at 4:14 AM. Reason: Grammar
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3767  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2015, 4:04 AM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is online now
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 11,335
I guess it depends on what a person actually means by the term "street".
__________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw
Don't ask people not to debate a topic. Just stop making debatable assertions. Problem solved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3768  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2015, 12:25 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,797
I find it interesting how I talk about one aspect and people spiral off in every direction debating different aspects that they thought were the ones I was talking about.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3769  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2015, 1:00 PM
koops65's Avatar
koops65 koops65 is offline
Intergalactic Barfly
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Quarks Bar
Posts: 8,787
I think the conversation is interesting, but it has nothing at all to do with future skylines...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3770  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2015, 9:18 PM
DrNest's Avatar
DrNest DrNest is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,119
Quote:
Originally Posted by koops65 View Post
I think the conversation is interesting, but it has nothing at all to do with future skylines...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3771  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2015, 9:30 PM
Martin Mtl's Avatar
Martin Mtl Martin Mtl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,074
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyRonin View Post
It is suburban - but when you get 10km out of the core of Montreal it looks more like, well, this: (though, so too does much of Toronto)


And that area actually is pretty urban for a post-war suburb - high population density, lot of pedestrian traffic, good assortment of businesses & amenities, generally vibrant. My point was that even if its pre-war built form is more modest; dense, urban(ish) areas like that spread out much further in Toronto due to modern infill.


Selective bias is all I that can attribute that to, aside from the very narrow streets of the Old Port.


.
I gave up. You're taking this discussion much more at heart that I care to. Cheers.

Just one last think, though, because it always irritates me: the Old Port doesn't have one single street in it. The Old Port is just the Old Port, the large waterfront/park area south of rue de la Commune. Everything else is call Old Montreal. There is no such thing as an Old Port Street. Also, there are more narrow streets in Le Plateau than in Old Montreal, even though Old Montreal is almost exclusively made of narrow streets.

Last edited by Martin Mtl; Oct 19, 2015 at 10:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3772  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2015, 11:28 PM
TRiToNDREyJA's Avatar
TRiToNDREyJA TRiToNDREyJA is offline
Create and Conquer
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 229
Maybe we can get back to skylines by being reminded that edmonton will be looking slick really soon. (the edmontonian probably wont happen so its yellow)





Holy hell...
__________________
Never "know" your place, create it instead
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3773  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 12:30 AM
Black Star Black Star is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 7,259
Cool.....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3774  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 12:35 AM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 10,715
Reminds me a bit of Yorkville mixed with Yonge and Eglington areas.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3775  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 6:46 AM
TallBob TallBob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,135
The "Edmontonian" will probably happen.... Just not that height or that design.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3776  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 9:19 PM
Daveography's Avatar
Daveography Daveography is offline
Klatuu Barada Nikto
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Island of Misfit Architecture
Posts: 4,483
ICE District model:



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3777  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2015, 1:00 AM
itom 987's Avatar
itom 987 itom 987 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,085
Edmonton's future skyline under construction:

Edmonton in October 2015 by Thomas Huizinga, on Flickr

October 2015 by Thomas Huizinga, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3778  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2015, 2:00 AM
Harrij's Avatar
Harrij Harrij is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRiToNDREyJA View Post
Maybe we can get back to skylines by being reminded that edmonton will be looking slick really soon. (the edmontonian probably wont happen so its yellow)





Holy hell...
Hopefully the area in the foreground can fill in with some nice towers like the northern part of DT.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3779  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2015, 4:47 PM
yaletown_fella yaletown_fella is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by rousseau View Post
I think the streets you've shown are all comparable, but then Montreal has the narrow streets of the Plateau that have no analogue in Toronto.

Okay, well, the streets in the Plateau themselves might be around the same width as in the West End in Toronto, but the solid wall of walkup housing in the Plateau fronts directly onto the sidewalk without any setbacks, making it feel a whole lot narrower. As per your comparison here:



When you walk around the Plateau it really does feel significantly narrower and denser than anywhere in Toronto.

Though I don't think Cabbagetown is really quite so representative of what you're likely to find in Toronto anyway. A better photo to hold up against Montreal's large stock of 19th century housing on the Plateau would have been from the long streets west of Bathurst running from Queen up to Bloor and beyond. That patch of real estate is more comparable in size to the Plateau. It feels distinctly wider and airier due to the setbacks from the sidewalks.

Strangely enough, the more treed parts Le Plateau remind me of a mix of Toronto's Mount Pleasant and the Beaches. The commerial strips are similar but the housing stock is very different. Avenue Laurier reminds me of Queen East/Willow/Victoria Park in the beaches in a way.

Similar yet different.

http://imgur.com/a/CaeK4
__________________
Supporter of Bill 23

Last edited by yaletown_fella; Oct 21, 2015 at 5:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3780  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2015, 4:22 PM
Kevin_foster's Avatar
Kevin_foster Kevin_foster is offline
Kevin Folds Five
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 6,072
Some models of future edmonton downtown (all under const. AFAIK)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boris2k7 View Post
Models!

Because... well... models!


Transform ICE Models 1 by RemotelyBoris, on Flickr


Transform ICE Models 2 by RemotelyBoris, on Flickr

(Honestly, who doesn't love just looking at these things...)
__________________
I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not sure...
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:04 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.