Quote:
Originally Posted by s.p.hansen
I know the article is written as a negative piece regarding flyover country and our clamoring to steal the spotlight from each other, but I don't really see a fight for convention space as a very negative thing. While it's certainly not public space in the same sense as a park or a street, it's pretty much public space for a manageable price. Having such large facilities for various gatherings of people being subsidized by the general public is lower on the "Should we be Doing This?" list than sports stadiums and private commercial/residential/industrial redevelopment projects (which I don't oppose either).
It's not necessarily a bad thing that our democracy is clamoring at a local level to fund space that amplifies our 1st amendment rights.
|
Excellent points Sean. I enjoyed the article, and do think that much of the middle of the country is considered flyover. I do think that Salt Lake and Denver have graduated beyond that point though, at least for most of those who do live on the West Coast, who actually travel or take vacations. Salt Lake City specifically, and Utah in general has become synonymous with destination vacation for most educated Californians.
I believe very strongly once Salt Lake has built it's major CCH, plus the newly added hundreds of additional boutique and assorted hotel rooms, it will be pretty difficult for most mid and some larger cities to compete with it's obvious draws. Utah's exceptional scenery and Salt Lake's proximity to it's gorgeous mountains isn't the secret it once was.