HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7221  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2015, 7:16 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by O-tacular View Post
Yes but keep in mind what's missing: Macleod trail, MRU, Kensington, U of C, Westbrook, Quarry Park, Seton, University City, Foothills Hospital, SunPark Plaza....

How does this one from Montreal look any different?
That's just one area that has strict height limits. Even so, it still has more highrrises than the much larger area in the Calgary view.
     
     
  #7222  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2015, 7:18 PM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is offline
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 26,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
Think everyone got it koops. Doesn't change that a small cluster on Macleod, a few isolated towers, one isolated tower complex and a hospital offers a short foreground compared to the big 3.
Well obviously the big 3 are bigger. That still ignores what I said about the fact this picture is missing almost all the non-core mid to high rise areas.
     
     
  #7223  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2015, 7:19 PM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is offline
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 26,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
That's just one area that has strict height limits. Even so, it still has more highrrises than the much larger area in the Calgary view.
What?!? Four towers is more than the dozen or so seen in the Calgary shot?
     
     
  #7224  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2015, 7:34 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by O-tacular View Post
Well obviously the big 3 are bigger. That still ignores what I said about the fact this picture is missing almost all the non-core mid to high rise areas.
And that's my point. Calgary from this angle can be perceived as small to someone more accustomed to the big 3 with their multiple clusters of midrises and highrises outside of the core skyline

Keep in mind Montreal has more 6 to 10 storey buildings outside of its core than probably anyone.

http://skyscraperpage.com/cities/maps/?cityID=3
http://skyscraperpage.com/cities/maps/?cityID=22

It's not meant as a slight against a city much smaller than the big 3. It's just how the photo can be interpreted.
     
     
  #7225  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2015, 12:09 AM
SkahHigh's Avatar
SkahHigh SkahHigh is offline
More transit please
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,794
     
     
  #7226  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2015, 2:22 PM
Laceoflight's Avatar
Laceoflight Laceoflight is offline
Montérégien
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Montréal, QC <> Paris, FR
Posts: 1,242
Deleted.

Last edited by Laceoflight; Sep 24, 2015 at 1:24 PM.
     
     
  #7227  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2015, 2:51 PM
cyeg66's Avatar
cyeg66 cyeg66 is offline
Contôleur aérien YYC
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Really, really north Leduc
Posts: 1,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkahHigh View Post
Deloitte appears to have sprouted numerous antennae in this one. (Man, I wish it would be 10-15 floors taller). Nice pic, though.
__________________
Trainer of dolphins and certified Shorkie whisperer
     
     
  #7228  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2015, 3:05 PM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is offline
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 11,351
I wish it was taller too. I think it has a strong enough design to be the 6th amongst the big 5. A height of about 175m would have been the sweet spot.
__________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw
Don't ask people not to debate a topic. Just stop making debatable assertions. Problem solved.
     
     
  #7229  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2015, 3:26 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,895
The design definitely needs more height and different curtainwall.
     
     
  #7230  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2015, 5:37 PM
Prometheus's Avatar
Prometheus Prometheus is offline
Reason and Freedom
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 4,016
     
     
  #7231  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2015, 6:01 PM
Martin Mtl's Avatar
Martin Mtl Martin Mtl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,074
     
     
  #7232  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2015, 6:07 PM
Martin Mtl's Avatar
Martin Mtl Martin Mtl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,074

Untitled by Ankur Tandon on flickr


Untitled by Ankur Tandon on flickr
     
     
  #7233  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2015, 6:53 PM
FrAnKs's Avatar
FrAnKs FrAnKs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ville de Québec / Quebec city
Posts: 5,936
Montreal is such a 🞵🞵🞵🞵 city.
__________________
PROVINCE OF QUEBEC ==> 9 050 000
MONTREAL METRO ==> 4 600 000
QUEBEC CITY METRO ==> 900 000
     
     
  #7234  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2015, 7:04 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 35,969
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
And that's my point. Calgary from this angle can be perceived as small to someone more accustomed to the big 3 with their multiple clusters of midrises and highrises outside of the core skyline

Keep in mind Montreal has more 6 to 10 storey buildings outside of its core than probably anyone.

http://skyscraperpage.com/cities/maps/?cityID=3
http://skyscraperpage.com/cities/maps/?cityID=22

It's not meant as a slight against a city much smaller than the big 3. It's just how the photo can be interpreted.
It's not really a "big 3" thing, it's a consequence of planning, geography, and the ways that cities grow. I've been to Calgary a couple of times and I also noticed that its highrise buildings are heavily concentrated downtown. A lot of large (Toronto-sized and up) American cities are like this as well. It is not the case that cities around a million people look like Calgary but then they all change and begin to look like Toronto or Montreal when some threshold is reached.

As another point of comparison, Halifax is smaller than Calgary but has a higher proportion of highrises outside of the downtown area: http://skyscraperpage.com/cities/maps/?cityID=66&lat=44.6478713706&lng=-63.6096608787&z=13

At the extreme end some cities barely even have a distinct downtown. They just have a large area of roughly the same density, sometimes with highrises sprinkled in.
     
     
  #7235  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2015, 10:59 PM
softee's Avatar
softee softee is offline
Aimless Wanderer
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Downtown Toronto
Posts: 3,434
Yeah, Ottawa and probably Hamilton and London also have more hi-rises and midrises outside their cores than Calgary does.
__________________
Public transit is the lifeblood of every healthy city.
     
     
  #7236  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2015, 12:42 AM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by softee View Post
Yeah, Ottawa and probably Hamilton and London also have more hi-rises and midrises outside their cores than Calgary does.
I suspect Winnipeg might as well.
     
     
  #7237  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2015, 3:22 AM
ssiguy ssiguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 11,982
For it's size, London has a HUGE amount of apt towers scattered around the city, by far more than any where else in the country of less than a million people.
     
     
  #7238  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2015, 3:28 AM
thmx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Content removed

Last edited by thmx; Sep 13, 2015 at 3:39 AM.
     
     
  #7239  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2015, 3:40 AM
Martin Mtl's Avatar
Martin Mtl Martin Mtl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,074
     
     
  #7240  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2015, 2:59 PM
Razor Razor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 3,033
[QUOTE=someone123;7161533]It's not really a "big 3" thing, it's a consequence of planning, geography, and the ways that cities grow. QUOTE]


Couldn't agree more. I always gave kudos to how the City of Calgary planners concentrated on infilling it's core. Whether it was conscious decision making while planning, or something that just happened organically doesn't matter. It still makes for one solid business and office district downtown vs having campus clusters scattered around the city a la' Toronto Montreal and even London or Ottawa.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:57 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.