HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #201  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2015, 1:58 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,813
Of course, a lot of the problems all stem back to the building of the Rideau Centre. It literally sucked the life out of Sparks Street and Rideau Street. Also, there was all the street reorientations that took place at the same time that were more about traffic flow and were ultimately anti-pedestrian.

Hopefully after 30 years, we are starting to see some re-invention of both Sparks Street and Rideau Street. Certainly the return of some population to the central core will help bring back some customers and some street life.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #202  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2015, 2:16 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,813
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uhuniau View Post
I don't think it ever fancied itself a commercial artery. Government has always been its main function since Parliament came to town; the 19th and early 20th-century non-government uses on the street were, apart from a few pioneer-era survivors west of Bank, mostly ancillary to government. (Law offices, newspaper bureaus, etc.)
Of course, this is why Sparks Street had developed as a commercial street one block to the south.

The fact that Sparks Street was relatively narrow with a density of buildings on both sides made it a natural for stores to develop. Also, Sparks Street was where the streetcars were running and the federal government deliberately kept them off of Wellington east of Bank so that the hanging wires would not be apparent in front of the Parliament buildings.

People are basically lazy and always have been, so Sparks Street (in the day) was a great place to shop in many stores in a short distance.

Ottawa also developed separate downtown areas on Sparks and Rideau with dividing point being the bridge over the Canal as a reflection of its divided sectarian history with upper town being the Protestant sector and lower town being the Roman Catholic sector. Obviously, this division has disappeared but was still apparent as recently as the 1960s. This has been replaced by the invisible division of the so called gap.

Interestingly, this was one of the factors in redeveloping Lansdowne Park to eliminate the gap between the commercial areas of the Glebe and Ottawa South that always existed with the exhibition grounds in between. It only takes a few blocks of emptiness to stop pedestrian traffic in its tracks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #203  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2015, 12:35 AM
canabiz canabiz is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 829
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #204  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2015, 12:55 AM
Capital Shaun Capital Shaun is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 862
Quote:
Originally Posted by canabiz View Post
Here's a novel idea: suspend the employees (no matter who they are) who are violating the employer's security policies (proping the door open.) They'll learn quickly after a few incidences.

Banning the employees from frequenting shops on Sparks St is completely ridiculous. I'm not a labour expert, but that's probably not even legal without a really good justification. An employee could easily walk around the block if the Sparks entrance is such a big issue.

Last edited by Capital Shaun; Sep 6, 2015 at 12:58 AM. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #205  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2015, 3:02 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 14,715
Quote:
Originally Posted by Capital Shaun View Post
Here's a novel idea: suspend the employees (no matter who they are) who are violating the employer's security policies (proping the door open.) They'll learn quickly after a few incidences.

Banning the employees from frequenting shops on Sparks St is completely ridiculous. I'm not a labour expert, but that's probably not even legal without a really good justification. An employee could easily walk around the block if the Sparks entrance is such a big issue.
My guess is that they've done this so as not to allow a select group of employees (those with the privilege of access to this door) to use it to quickly pop out and go next door to get their Timmy's coffee, while the majority of the employees have to walk all the way around the block to do the same thing. It removes a double standard and makes everybody equal. It has nothing to do with preventing employees from shopping on Sparks Street.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #206  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2015, 3:56 PM
Capital Shaun Capital Shaun is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 862
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketphish View Post
My guess is that they've done this so as not to allow a select group of employees (those with the privilege of access to this door) to use it to quickly pop out and go next door to get their Timmy's coffee, while the majority of the employees have to walk all the way around the block to do the same thing. It removes a double standard and makes everybody equal. It has nothing to do with preventing employees from shopping on Sparks Street.
Could they not simply put an acess card reader on that door?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #207  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2015, 1:30 AM
kevinbottawa kevinbottawa is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,260
Winners opened on Sparks Street yesterday. I went with my wife and kids. It has a similar look as the one at Lansdowne. The entrance is very well done. Winners and Bier Markt are a major upgrade over Zellers although it was convenient to have a store like Zellers downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #208  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2015, 1:00 AM
citydwlr citydwlr is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 734
Stumbled on this article in the Hill Times today regarding the future of some of the buildings on the northern side of Sparks Street:
http://www.hilltimes.com/news/news/2015/...treet-north-parliamentary-precinct/44139

Of Note:
Quote:
Preparation of a “Blocks 1, 2, 3 Demonstration Plan,” as Public Works calls it, has been more actively ongoing since a 2010 memorandum to Cabinet, as indicated by documents uncovered by investigative researcher Ken Rubin and shared with The Hill Times—though conversations about work to the area pre-date this.

Last spring, Public Works met with the NCC in-camera to present its plans and the department already has approval “in concept” from the NCC and the Federal Heritage Buildings Review Office (FHBRO, which falls under Parks Canada).

Based on “class D” cost estimates provided to Public Works in October 2013, the “Blocks 1, 2, 3 Master Plan” could cost between $253.6-million and $385.3-million, depending on chosen options, and involves the construction of four new office buildings.

The House of Norcano, the O’Brien Building and the Nelms Building—all built at the turn of the 20th century, the first of which is home to The Hill Times—on Sparks Street would all be demolished under this plan in order to build a new, roughly 4,000-square-metre building.

A new building would also be built at 90 Wellington St., a site currently home to the visitor’s information centre and a public square featuring a statue of Terry Fox. A third new building would go up at 120 Wellington St., between the old U.S. embassy and its small annex building, both of which have sat abandoned for years and development of which is also being discussed. A fourth, roughly 2,000-square-metre office building would be erected where the Fisher Building currently stands on Sparks Street.

Along with construction of these new buildings, renovations are proposed for the Blackburn Building and the Langevin Block, at an estimated $32.59-million; to the Hope Chambers building, at an estimated $5.62-million; and the National Press Theatre, at an estimated $10.73-million, among a number of others. Each of the three blocks would also include atriums and underground walkways, which would connect to the main Parliamentary Precinct.
Quote:
Kevin McHale, executive director of the Sparks Street business improvement area (BIA), said plans to potentially demolish buildings along the north side of Sparks Street and construct new office buildings were news to him.

“I can say that we haven’t been contacted by anybody about any type of these long-terms plans in the year-and-a-half, almost two years that I’ve been in the [BIA],” said Mr. McHale.

He said before he joined the BIA, “there was a brief discussion to our board about their [Public Works’] kind of 50-year model,” but “not to any detail.”
Personally, I'd hate to see some of these buildings demolished, specifically the O'Brien and Fisher buildings. Here are some photos of the buildings up for demolition via the Treasury Board website :

House of Norcano:


[Source]

O'Brien Building:


[Source]

Nelms Building:


[Source]

Fisher Building:


[Source]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #209  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2015, 8:29 PM
OTSkyline OTSkyline is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,828
May I please purchase the O'Brien building and turn it into an urban townhome or "pied-a-terre"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #210  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2015, 3:18 AM
silvergate's Avatar
silvergate silvergate is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 629
Quote:
Originally Posted by OTSkyline View Post
May I please purchase the O'Brien building and turn it into an urban townhome or "pied-a-terre"
You might single-handedly save sparks st with that move
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #211  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2015, 4:06 AM
YOWetal YOWetal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,761
Granted Fisher and O'Brien are nice enough buildings and might be worth protecting in say Smith Falls, but they are far from unique and far to short for the centre of, as the Cliche goes, a G7 capital.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #212  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2015, 9:40 PM
DEWLine DEWLine is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 337
I miss Renouf Books. Unrelated, but now that I've seen the picture of the former storefront...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #213  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2015, 2:00 AM
kevinbottawa kevinbottawa is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,260
I see they're laying down new red brick on Sparks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #214  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2015, 7:14 PM
acottawa acottawa is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 18,935
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinbottawa View Post
I see they're laying down new red brick on Sparks.
I wonder if there was some sort of historical requirement to use 70s style pink paving stones, or are they now back in style?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #215  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2015, 8:49 PM
citydwlr citydwlr is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 734
Here's a photo of the pink/red pavers from November 12, via the EcoDisitrict Twitter feed:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #216  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2015, 9:36 PM
Aylmer's Avatar
Aylmer Aylmer is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,407
That'll fix it! All this time, all Sparks Street needed was red brick for it to become a vibrant, world-class destination for all Canadians!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #217  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2015, 7:10 PM
Arcologist Arcologist is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 696
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aylmer View Post
That'll fix it! All this time, all Sparks Street needed was red brick for it to become a vibrant, world-class destination for all Canadians!
Who knew?!?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #218  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2015, 12:15 AM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 29,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by citydwlr View Post
Here's a photo of the pink/red pavers from November 12, via the EcoDisitrict Twitter feed:

Ottawa, the tacky (G8) capital of the world!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #219  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2016, 12:57 AM
Cre47's Avatar
Cre47 Cre47 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,971
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #220  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2016, 2:05 AM
Buggys Buggys is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 659
Vehicles on the mall sparking pedestrian concerns: 'It's to the point where someone's going to get hit'

DON BUTLER, OTTAWA CITIZEN
More from Don Butler, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: March 10, 2016 | Last Updated: March 10, 2016 8:15 PM EST
Sparks Street businesses are handing out free parking passes to their customers.
SHARE ADJUST COMMENT PRINT

For a pedestrian street, the Sparks Street Mall sure does have a lot of traffic on it.

And at least one public servant who walks the mall to work says the cars, delivery vans and construction trucks that increasingly use Sparks Street are imperilling the safety of unwary pedestrians.

William Wells, who works in the Thomas D’Arcy McGee Building, says he regularly sees cars driving down the mall at 30, 40, even 50 kilometres an hour.

While crossing the street this past Tuesday, Wells narrowly dodged an SUV. “Had I not looked back and checked, I would have walked right into it,” he says. “The guy stopped and apologized because he saw how close it was.”

Wells says this was not an isolated incident. “I’m constantly telling drivers to slow down now. It’s to the point where somebody’s going to get hit.”


Wells isn’t the only person to notice a change. Last month, Ottawa resident Phil Gordon tweeted this: “So remind me again when Sparks Street became a thoroughfare and parking lot? So much fun dodging traffic!”

Vehicular traffic has increased for several reasons. Until 10 a.m., the street is often chock-a-block with trucks and vans making deliveries to shops and businesses.

For much of the day, vehicles belonging to crews working on several major construction projects are parked on the mall. And the mall’s own VIP parking program, introduced last winter, only adds to the traffic.

Click on graphic for larger view:

An auto invasion



The program, which runs from early December until the end of March, gives retailers — though not restaurants — two passes they can give customers providing an hour of free parking directly on Sparks Street from Monday to Saturday.

“The response from our merchants has been very positive,” says Kevin McHale, the Sparks Street Authority’s program and events co-ordinator. “It helps them create a very good customer experience during what’s traditionally the slow season for them.”

It also helps address the loss of business from hundreds of public servants displaced by long-term renovations under way at 180 Wellington St. and the Thomas D’Arcy McGee Building at 90 Sparks St. “These retailers down here have seen a lot of their customer base disappear,” McHale says.

SUBMIT A TIP

Click here to let us know.

According to a notice on the Sparks Street Authority’s website, drivers taking advantage of the VIP parking program are supposed to slow down to five kilometres an hour and turn on their four-way flashers.

Most follow the rules, according to McHale, who says it would be “fairly impossible” to drive down the mall at the speeds claimed by Wells.

However, during a 75-minute audit by the Citizen on Thursday afternoon, none of the dozen cars and trucks seen entering or leaving the mall used their four-way flashers. None drove recklessly or came close to hitting any pedestrians, but most appeared to be driving between 10 and 25 kilometres an hour.

As many as 20 vehicles were parked on the three-block section of the mall around 2 p.m. Thursday. Most had construction permits or the green VIP permits visible.

But two drivers entered the one-way street from the wrong direction, parked and ran quick errands. One dashed into a sushi outlet and emerged five minutes later with a takeout order. Another returned an apparently defective suitcase to a leather goods store.

Another woman parked her Mercedes near Sparks and O’Connor, collected a permit from a nearby merchant, then strode the length of the mall to Elgin before disappearing in the direction of the ByWard Market.

McHale says the mall authority does what it can to crack down on speeding and people who abuse the ability to park on Sparks.

While the mall authority doesn’t rely on city police to curb speeders, it employs a site supervisor who patrols the mall, McHale says. “If he thinks someone is moving too fast, he’s the first one to wave them down and slow them down.”

The mall also calls in bylaw enforcement when it believes someone is parking illegally, he says.

McHale says he understands that some people oppose the presence of vehicles. “They look at Sparks Street and say, ‘You’re a pedestrian promenade. That’s what you should be. You shouldn’t have vehicles on there.’

“Unfortunately, the reality is deliveries have to be done, businesses need to survive. And one of the things the businesses were saying is they really needed a little bit of extra help during the off-season when our foot traffic on the street is greatly reduced.”

That’s little comfort to Wells. “What I loved about Sparks was it didn’t have cars,” he says. “Before, I could jog down there without having to worry about it. But now, I’m constantly looking over my shoulder.”

[email protected]

twitter.com/ButlerDon
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:36 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.