HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Business & the Economy


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #661  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2015, 6:39 AM
Caliplanner1 Caliplanner1 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 692
Quote:
Originally Posted by st7860 View Post
The recent report says foreigners are a minority in the vancouver market.
But what the report fails to also do here is to effectively define the concept of a "foreigner". To argue that recently arrived Chinese permanent resident (card holding) immigrants are not "foreigners" is very disingenuous, don't you think????
     
     
  #662  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2015, 6:46 AM
st7860 st7860 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,299
Foreigners is a loaded word lol. There are a lot of Asian foreigners of various types in each of vancouver and surrey along with middle easterners in north vancouver so if one desires a more static Canadian life without mixing too much with foreigners then the east coast would be better
     
     
  #663  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2015, 2:39 PM
Caliplanner1 Caliplanner1 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 692
Quote:
Originally Posted by st7860 View Post
Foreigners is a loaded word lol. There are a lot of Asian foreigners of various types in each of vancouver and surrey along with middle easterners in north vancouver so if one desires a more static Canadian life without mixing too much with foreigners then the east coast would be better
I think the real issue here (as it affects house prices) is that the wealthy (immigrant) "foreigners" are not relying on the health of the local economy to be able to afford a house but rather are bringing in foreign earned monies......thus, effecting a case of (growing income inequality and) imported inflation!
     
     
  #664  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2015, 8:58 PM
twoNeurons twoNeurons is offline
loafing in lotusland
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lotusland
Posts: 6,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by st7860 View Post
You say you don't live in Vancouver and still think about it.

Vancouver is affordable to people of all types. It isn't related to being impossible. The higher the better. And for sure you're entitled thinking everyone should have a discount home
That's the very definition of risk. We've essentially built up a massive economy on the idea of selling each others' houses. Every dollar that goes into housing is coming out of liquidity. It’s a dollar less for saving, investing, growing, insuring against the unforeseen and the future needs of your family. It's not a balanced economy. Although the problem is magnified in Vancouver, it's across Canada.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caliplanner1 View Post
I think the real issue here (as it affects house prices) is that the wealthy (immigrant) "foreigners" are not relying on the health of the local economy to be able to afford a house but rather are bringing in foreign earned monies......thus, effecting a case of (growing income inequality and) imported inflation!
The reality is the foreign monies' argument is nothing but a real estate boogeyman to take the attention away from the real problem, the real problem that no political leader wants to touch. It is us. Putting controls on foreigners won't change prices because LOCALS run real estate. Without the "foreigner" to blame, who is there left?

The government also hasn't done us any favors by letting the banks take on essentially no risk and not punishing them for encouraging massive debt loads. But, like I said, no self-respecting politician is going to blame the people, not if he wants to stay elected. And as an extension of that politicians will not, in an election year, make any moves that seem to be anti-constituent, like making it harder for banks to give out loans to people who shouldn't qualify. They were doing a few things to try and cool the market, like removing CMHC insurance on properties over $1m, removing 0% down 35 and 40-year mortgages, making re-financing based on the value of the house, not the value of the mortgage, but it had a tame effect.

In the end, the USA is what may cool the Canadian market, and hopefully a lot of wealth won't disappear. The US FED is on track to raising rates by 0.5% this year alone. We're looking at a gradual increase in rates over the next few years. Canada will follow suit, probably after the election. It always does.

A manulife Bank survey showed that a 33% of mortgage owners would be in financial difficulty if mortgage payments increased 10%. That's about an interest rate hike of ~%1. Another 15% of mortgage owners said they can't handle ANY increase at all.

Eggs, meet Basket. Everybody in.

It likely won't be massive collapse like doom n' gloom analysts predict. It will likely be just a small drop and stagnant prices over the next 5–10 years as smart money exits real estate and boomers start selling their homes to fund their retirement. Of course, stagnant prices mean a yearly drop at the rate of inflation, but people don't think that way about houses. Lots of people will have almost NO savings and have wealth locked up in real estate. Illiquid.

If Canada doesn't follow the US (For the first time), investors sees that as a lack of confidence and the CAD$ drops, and everything gets more expensive and puts a lot more people at risk.

That's my 5¢
     
     
  #665  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2015, 9:33 PM
Caliplanner1 Caliplanner1 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 692
Quote:
Originally Posted by twoNeurons View Post
Every dollar that goes into housing is coming out of liquidity. It’s a dollar less for saving, investing, growing, insuring against the unforeseen and the future needs of your family. It's not a balanced economy. Although the problem is magnified in Vancouver, it's across Canada. The reality is the foreign monies' argument is nothing but a real estate boogeyman to take the attention away from the real problem, the real problem that no political leader wants to touch. It is us. Putting controls on foreigners won't change prices because LOCALS run real estate. Without the "foreigner" to blame, who is there left? That's my 5¢

You make some salient points above but I maintain (as a foreigner myself) that my argument isn't a simplistic one seeking to superficially blame foreigners or the Chinese alone. I do agree that local Canadian banking laws/regulations are also in the "blame mix"....but you can't ignore the real (world) market forces of EFFECTIVE demand versus relatively static (if not shrinking) housing supply! Vancouver's high housing cost issues do not exist in say unpalatable Prince Rupert or Whitehorse,.......because (in part,..and even with the same nation wide Canadian banking regulation in effect) wealthy foreigners (and locals) aren't seeking to live in a frozen icebox/barren wasteland (and no disrespect to colder climes meant here)!
     
     
  #666  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2015, 10:32 PM
Alex Mackinnon's Avatar
Alex Mackinnon Alex Mackinnon is offline
Can I has a tunnel?
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caliplanner1 View Post
Vancouver's high housing cost issues do not exist in say unpalatable Prince Rupert or Whitehorse,.......because (in part,..and even with the same nation wide Canadian banking regulation in effect) wealthy foreigners (and locals) aren't seeking to live in a frozen icebox/barren wasteland (and no disrespect to colder climes meant here)!
Actually Whitehorse has hilariously expensive housing for somewhere almost void of people.
__________________
"It's ok, I'm an engineer!" -Famous last words
     
     
  #667  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2015, 3:05 AM
Spork's Avatar
Spork Spork is offline
Shoebox Dweller
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,784
There are a number of issues at play, and nothing can be looked at in isolation. I think that if we are a country/province/region with a desire for more affordable housing prices, we need to consider which ones we would consider to regulate in the context of what is "just". I think that it is helpful to list these issues and consider which ones (or combination thereof) are unacceptable to us and would be just to regulate.

I've read many things mentioned over the past several pages, in countless articles, and in debates with friends or colleagues. In the end, six issues are raised:
  • The rights of existing homeowners versus the population as a whole
  • The future impact of interest rate increases
  • Foreign influence (defined at whatever level of granularity you want) (A)
  • Foreign money influence (likewise) (B)
  • Investor influence (C)
  • Unoccupied property influence (D)

Each of these can be defined in any way we'd like. The first two are debatable in isolation, but the remaining four seem to stand as a consideration on their own. I've built an imperfect (and hastily drawn, given several overlapping areas are excluded) diagram to illustrate how I think that we should look at the issue (i.e. not at all mutually exclusive):


  • A: Foreigners purchasing property (or even just residentially zoned property)
  • B: Foreign money being used to purchase property
  • C: Individuals purchasing property specifically as an investment
  • D: Properties being purchased and left unoccupied (however defined)
  • AB: Foreigners purchasing properties with foreign money only
  • AC: Foreigners purchasing properties for investment purposes only
  • CD: Investors purchasing properties and leaving them unoccupied
  • BD: Foreign money being used to purchase properties and leave them unoccupied.
  • ABC: Foreigners using foreign money to purchase properties for investment purposes only.
  • ABD: Foreigners using foreign money to purchase properties and leaving them unoccupied.
  • ACD: Foreigners using local money and purchasing properties for investment purposes and leaving them unoccupied.
  • BCD: Foreign money being used to purchase properties for investment purposes to which the property is left unoccupied.
  • ABCD: Foreigners using foreign money to purchase properties for investment purposes and leaving them unoccupied.

Regardless of what the data says about what proportion of the market any of the above constitutes, we simply should consider which ones are "just" to regulate and pursue regulation. Sizing each of the above can be used to provide an estimate of the size of each of the above, but I do not feel that we should require a certain estimate of the impact of regulation on the overall market (e.g. if we regulate area X, the market will decrease by 3.2%) before we make a decision. The just nature of a regulation should be sufficient.

My 2c.
     
     
  #668  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2015, 3:13 AM
st7860 st7860 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,299
I like middle aged people and senior citizens a lot because they tend to vote more often than those under 30 and the govermemt knows that disturbing their retirement plans isn't a good way to get votes .
     
     
  #669  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2015, 4:12 AM
Caliplanner1 Caliplanner1 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 692
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Mackinnon View Post
Actually Whitehorse has hilariously expensive housing for somewhere almost void of people.
The irony of Whitehorse's relatively higher than average housing price levels is not necessarily based on effective demand as it is a function of relatively higher housing construction/replacement costs. On the other hand, Vancouver's high housing costs seems to be driven more so by effective demand rather than supply side cost factors!
     
     
  #670  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2015, 3:54 AM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 26,725
This article from the Province this week highlights the trickle down effect few have mentioned when discussing affordability:

"...So, does that mean offshore buyers are only driving up the prices of Vancouver mansions and penthouse suites? Must there be another explanation for soaring across-the-board prices throughout the region?

Not according to University of B.C. professor David Ley, who says the massive upward pressure on high-end home prices can inflate prices everywhere.

“My sense is that there is an effect from the top end throughout the market,” said Ley, author of the book Millionaire Migrants: Trans-Pacific Life Lines.

“The people who sell these homes, they have got a very substantial income stream now for them to buy someplace else. People typically move out to the suburbs. They carry that equity with them and affect that market..."


http://www.theprovince.com/business/...199/story.html
     
     
  #671  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2015, 4:03 AM
st7860 st7860 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,299
the pricing out is caused by the ultra low interest rates and isnt related to various foreigners
     
     
  #672  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2015, 4:27 AM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant - The New Downtown South
Posts: 8,065
How could low interest rates price people out of home buying?
     
     
  #673  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2015, 4:31 AM
Caliplanner1 Caliplanner1 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 692
Quote:
Originally Posted by st7860 View Post
the pricing out is caused by the ultra low interest rates and isnt related to various foreigners
Common sense economic insight would suggest that IF low interest rates were being gobbled up by locals (or even foreigners) towards purchasing home real estate in Vancouver at significant levels then along with rising home prices locally one would also see rising mortgage/home loan interest rates locally (based on higher effective demand for said -previously- low interest home loans).......but to the contrary, home loan rates remain RELATIVELY low, so what gives!!??.
     
     
  #674  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2015, 4:36 AM
st7860 st7860 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,299
low interest rates in canada help push things up - they were just dropped a few weeks ago
     
     
  #675  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2015, 4:43 AM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant - The New Downtown South
Posts: 8,065
Or is it the other way around.
     
     
  #676  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2015, 5:19 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,357
Quote:
Originally Posted by st7860 View Post
the pricing out is caused by the ultra low interest rates and isnt related to various foreigners
I am pretty sure it is not just one reason pushing the prices up, but low interest rates AND foreign buyers AND few other things all contribute to it. Life is never just black or white.
     
     
  #677  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2015, 5:53 AM
Caliplanner1 Caliplanner1 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 692
Quote:
Originally Posted by st7860 View Post
low interest rates in canada help push things up - they were just dropped a few weeks ago
.......so let me get this straight...you say here that interest rates were just dropped a few weeks ago but yet home prices in Vancouver have been rising rapidly for a number of years (as a function of low interest rates)????? Even if interest rates were dropped many years ago as well, the ongoing increasing demand for cheap home loans (as you are arguing) would eventually result in higher/rising home loan interest rates. Is this happening???
     
     
  #678  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2015, 4:38 PM
Steveston Steveston is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 472
Demand for home ownership comes from a variety of sources.

Low interest rates provide opportunities for renters to convert to buyers, and also for new household formation (adult children leaving the family home). These have nothing whatsoever to do with foreign capital.

Foreign purchasers, on the other hand, are attracted by Vancouver's reputation as a "safe place to invest", and its high ranking in the "world's best cities" list. Given that many of these transactions are cash deals, they are not influenced by low interest rates. However, those offshore investors who wish to employ debt, and utilize rental income to cover debt servicing, will be attracted by low interest rates as well.

Recent reports from MacDonald Realty have shown that foreign investors are primarily active in the west side/luxury market, and much less so in the lower priced/suburban markets. This would suggest that any price escalation in the mid-lower priced home markets (which include townhouses and apartments) is driven primarily by new household formation and perhaps interprovincial migration (which is on the rise again). It should also be noted that the degree of price escalation in townhouses and apartments is significantly lower than that of detached homes.

To say that overall price escalation is due to a single factor is, in my opinion, erroneous. As well, it is incorrect to state that "Vancouver real estate is overpriced", when there are many segments to the "Vancouver real estate market", and only the upscale west side market is experiencing extreme price escalation. Yes, other areas have seen prices increase, but not nearly to the %age rates as the west side.
     
     
  #679  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2015, 4:44 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caliplanner1 View Post
.......so let me get this straight...you say here that interest rates were just dropped a few weeks ago but yet home prices in Vancouver have been rising rapidly for a number of years (as a function of low interest rates)????? Even if interest rates were dropped many years ago as well, the ongoing increasing demand for cheap home loans (as you are arguing) would eventually result in higher/rising home loan interest rates. Is this happening???
The government actually wants people to buy homes to drive the lousy economy. Foreign money, be it from foreigners or new landed immigrants, is what they are targetting foremost. Lowering interest rates will "help" locals compete with foreigners for properties, thus escalating prices even further. This is a quick way to make money like a pyramid scheme, both for the government and banks. Good for the banks as they get long-term income, but a short sighted measure indeed for the country. People are just like sheep as they follow along meekly.
     
     
  #680  
Old Posted Aug 27, 2015, 10:13 AM
casper's Avatar
casper casper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 12,217
Looks like the School board is making good money from handling International Students. At $13,000 per foreign student that is quite a bit and helping subsidize the infrastructure for local students. Win-Win situation for everyone.

I wonder how many of these students are in foreign owned homes.

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/internatio...015514309.html
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Business & the Economy
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:10 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.