HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Business & the Economy


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #621  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2015, 2:36 AM
Caliplanner1 Caliplanner1 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 692
Quote:
Originally Posted by st7860 View Post
That's one of the key differences I've noticed between Canada and the US. In the US they don't care if a foreigner buys things you use or dont use including housing since they understand thats money for their city, but in Canada people would rather those buyers spend the money elsewhere.
The U.S. is also much bigger in terms of population and alternative urban spaces in which to live and find cheaper housing or better jobs! If (for example) one wants warmer weather in which to live/work in the states one can live in Florida, Louisiana, Texas, Arizona, California, Hawaii and even further in Puerto Rico or the U.S. Virgin Islands etc.. If one wants to live in a "warmer area" here in Canada one really only has a choice between Vancouver and Victoria/Nanaimo etc.. So if every "warm weather" immigrant rushes to Vancouver what do you think will happen to house prices (a case of supply versus demand)???

Last edited by Caliplanner1; Jun 16, 2015 at 3:22 AM.
     
     
  #622  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2015, 3:22 AM
Caliplanner1 Caliplanner1 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 692
Quote:
Originally Posted by st7860 View Post
Yes the US could raise rates, then Canadian rates may rise. In that case get a 10 year locked in rate if that is a concern. If the US buys less exports yes that would cause problems but then in Vancouver/Toronto there aren't many industrial workers directly contributing towards exports to the US anyway.
Isn't Canada supposed to be the largest trading partner with the U.S.?
     
     
  #623  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2015, 5:00 AM
memememe76 memememe76 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 824
Yes, all Americans love those foreign buyers:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...x-them-for-it/

Quote:
Foreign investors are making housing more expensive. Should we tax them for it?
http://www.psmag.com/business-econom...ve-homes-76854

Quote:
While gentrification is pointed at as a driver of urban change, the term doesn’t really begin to describe what’s actually going on. When real estate is looked at simply as a way to make money rather than homes, new communities aren’t being created. Properties flip and rents rise too quickly for tenants to stay long. As corner dry cleaners are swapped out for clothing boutiques, rents rise exponentially, and owners are motivated to swap out their renters for a higher-paying batch. Meanwhile, empty buildings are traded like cattle.
I also recall some grumblings when Canadians were buying up properties in Phoenix and Vegas.
     
     
  #624  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2015, 5:23 AM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
The Vancouver Sun reports today on the curious case of Richmond's Thompson neighbourhood, which has some of the Lower Mainland's priciest homes, yet income statistics show a level of "poverty" second only to the DTES:
http://www.vancouversun.com/business...169/story.html

By curious coincidence, 6 out of 10 residents in the area are from China.
I'm sure this is the reality to a lesser extent for most of Metro Vancouver. But ssiguy keeps going on about the affordability crisis and the impending apocalypse "incomes don't match housing prices!" lol. Now you know the issue really isn't the affordability.
     
     
  #625  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2015, 5:50 AM
Caliplanner1 Caliplanner1 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 692
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleung View Post
I'm sure this is the reality to a lesser extent for most of Metro Vancouver. But ssiguy keeps going on about the affordability crisis and the impending apocalypse "incomes don't match housing prices!" lol. Now you know the issue really isn't the affordability.
Rich people pretending they are poor and poor people pretending they are rich!
     
     
  #626  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2015, 6:58 AM
Xerx Xerx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caliplanner1 View Post
The U.S. is also much bigger in terms of population and alternative urban spaces in which to live and find cheaper housing or better jobs! If (for example) one wants warmer weather in which to live/work in the states one can live in Florida, Louisiana, Texas, Arizona, California, Hawaii and even further in Puerto Rico or the U.S. Virgin Islands etc.. If one wants to live in a "warmer area" here in Canada one really only has a choice between Vancouver and Victoria/Nanaimo etc.. So if every "warm weather" immigrant rushes to Vancouver what do you think will happen to house prices (a case of supply versus demand)???
Well, this is a crazy fantasy of mine, but I'd hope that that situation would create enough political pressure to finally annex the Turks and Caicos.
     
     
  #627  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2015, 12:48 PM
casper's Avatar
casper casper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 12,217
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caliplanner1 View Post
Rich people pretending they are poor and poor people pretending they are rich!
Canada does not tax wealth it taxes income. Someone who has a lot of money tied up in a private business may well have a low family income if they only take out what they need and the result is reinvested in the business.
     
     
  #628  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2015, 2:22 PM
Caliplanner1 Caliplanner1 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 692
Quote:
Originally Posted by casper View Post
Canada does not tax wealth it taxes income. Someone who has a lot of money tied up in a private business may well have a low family income if they only take out what they need and the result is reinvested in the business.
But then what about "the rich" who increase their wealth by not effectively declaring income so as not to be effectively taxed (after gaining all that wealth via the benefits afforded by a government sponsored/protected political economy)?
     
     
  #629  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2015, 2:28 PM
st7860 st7860 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,299
One other difference also is that Canada doesn't have an estate tax
     
     
  #630  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2015, 3:52 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,724
Is family pocket money considered "income"? Maybe that explains why that part of Richmond is so "poor". There are mostly the young or the retired immigrants living in that part perhaps. By "young", I do mean those as old as folks in the 30s and even 40s, who don't necessarily need to work with the family wealth tied up elsewhere.
     
     
  #631  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2015, 4:37 PM
WBC WBC is offline
Transit User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Metrotown/Downtown
Posts: 804
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xerx View Post
Well, this is a crazy fantasy of mine, but I'd hope that that situation would create enough political pressure to finally annex the Turks and Caicos.
Just a first step on our unstoppable march down Caribbean. We also may want to annex Yucatan (the good part next to the beach) and then reach out to Pacific and add Cook Islands.
     
     
  #632  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2015, 9:33 PM
twoNeurons twoNeurons is offline
loafing in lotusland
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lotusland
Posts: 6,090
Any limitations on tear-downs or other ways to mess with the market will end up in failure. Just ask Australia.

Why?

Real estate, despite the hype, is still local. The RE Board doesn't publish numbers of foreign owners (except Victoria) but most real estimates put it under 5% foreign ownership. It's curious that they don't publish these numbers. They'd be easy to gather from their data. NOTE: Real estate is an industry which regulates itself. Several years ago, data in the US was required to be publically available. It adds transparency. It's why sites like Zillow exist in the states, but not Canada. RE boards don't give out data. Really, it should be part of the public record.

What's fuelling real estate in Vancouver is what is fuelling it in the rest of the country. Cheap money, debt-culture, and inter-generational money transfers ( The bank of parental units ).

Essentially, if we want to cool the market, we have to increase the cost of debt or put stricter controls on banks giving out mortgages. Or better yet... remove the CMHC insurance requirement for people with less than 20% down and make the banks accept the full risk of giving money out freely.

The more you try to control, the more unintended consequences you will have.
     
     
  #633  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2015, 9:52 PM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
Then why is Vancouver so much more expensive than the rest of Canada with coincidentally a lot more recent Chinese immigrants during the same time as the spike in cost?

They don't publish the numbers because they don't want to stop the money flowing in from Asia, obviously.
     
     
  #634  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2015, 9:57 PM
st7860 st7860 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,299
Quote:
Originally Posted by twoNeurons View Post
Any limitations on tear-downs or other ways to mess with the market will end up in failure. Just ask Australia.

Why?

Real estate, despite the hype, is still local. The RE Board doesn't publish numbers of foreign owners (except Victoria) but most real estimates put it under 5% foreign ownership. It's curious that they don't publish these numbers. They'd be easy to gather from their data. NOTE: Real estate is an industry which regulates itself. Several years ago, data in the US was required to be publically available. It adds transparency. It's why sites like Zillow exist in the states, but not Canada. RE boards don't give out data. Really, it should be part of the public record.

What's fuelling real estate in Vancouver is what is fuelling it in the rest of the country. Cheap money, debt-culture, and inter-generational money transfers ( The bank of parental units ).

Essentially, if we want to cool the market, we have to increase the cost of debt or put stricter controls on banks giving out mortgages. Or better yet... remove the CMHC insurance requirement for people with less than 20% down and make the banks accept the full risk of giving money out freely.

The more you try to control, the more unintended consequences you will have.
Yes. Low down payment mortgages are what's happening. Its difficult for haters to grasp though
     
     
  #635  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2015, 10:23 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,431
Quote:
Originally Posted by st7860 View Post
Yes. Low down payment mortgages are what's happening. Its difficult for haters to grasp though
For the love of all things holy, grow up and drop the "haters" schtick. Your, um, lack of experience points (that's a gamer thing, right?), is showing.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
     
     
  #636  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2015, 10:33 PM
st7860 st7860 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,299
Haters will hate. When I see a nice house I don't think wow omg it costs a million holy lord!. It's just a house that someone bought .
     
     
  #637  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2015, 10:47 PM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 26,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by st7860 View Post
Yes. Low down payment mortgages are what's happening. Its difficult for haters to grasp though
Spare us. Some of us know exactly why you deny, deny. Just curious, is it daddy's sweatshop or yours?
     
     
  #638  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2015, 10:49 PM
st7860 st7860 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,299
The recent report says foreigners are a minority in the vancouver market.
     
     
  #639  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2015, 11:07 PM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
The term "haters" should be reserved for the people who benefit from destroying the housing market for regular people who just want to make an honest living in their home city. e.g. st7860. You hate Canadians.
     
     
  #640  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2015, 11:17 PM
st7860 st7860 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,299
The term "haters" applies to the individuals who whine about people buying things they can't afford.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=hater
"A person that simply cannot be happy for another person's success. So rather than be happy they make a point of exposing a flaw in that person.

Hating, the result of being a hater, is not exactly jealousy. The hater doesnt really want to be the person he or she hates, rather the hater wants to knock somelse down a notch."
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Business & the Economy
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:03 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.