HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1221  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2015, 1:23 AM
NOWINYOW NOWINYOW is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 479
Quote:
Originally Posted by VaskoYOW View Post
Does anyone know why YOW-FRA is being diverted to YYZ tonight? The plane was above YQB, when it turned around and is schedule to land in YYZ at 18:45!

On-board weather radar equipment failure. Parts/labour may have been more readily available in YYZ rather than YUL.

It's scheduled to depart YYZ at 21:40
     
     
  #1222  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2015, 2:08 AM
VaskoYOW VaskoYOW is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOWINYOW View Post
On-board weather radar equipment failure. Parts/labour may have been more readily available in YYZ rather than YUL.

It's scheduled to depart YYZ at 21:40
Thank you!
     
     
  #1223  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2015, 1:54 PM
MountainView MountainView is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,168
Speaking of YOW-FRA not sure if mentioned already but it will end October 25 for the winter season (again sadly). I bet when AC has more 787s and transfers the remaining young 767s to AC Rouge the route could stay year round (daily or not).
     
     
  #1224  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2015, 6:06 PM
VaskoYOW VaskoYOW is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by MountainView View Post
Speaking of YOW-FRA not sure if mentioned already but it will end October 25 for the winter season (again sadly). I bet when AC has more 787s and transfers the remaining young 767s to AC Rouge the route could stay year round (daily or not).
I rather have the YOW-LHR seasonal than the YOW-FRA. FRA being a Star Alliance with AC brings more passengers through FRA compare to LHR and "Oneworld". My opinion at least.
     
     
  #1225  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2015, 12:58 PM
Dominion301 Dominion301 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,774
Quote:
Originally Posted by VaskoYOW View Post
I rather have the YOW-LHR seasonal than the YOW-FRA. FRA being a Star Alliance with AC brings more passengers through FRA compare to LHR and "Oneworld". My opinion at least.
In terms of connections, FRA is way better, but in terms of yield to AC, I'm guessing LHR is more lucrative. A couple of years ago (can't find the source, sorry), I remember reading that over 50% of YOW-LHR traffic is O&D, whereas YOW-FRA is only 15% O&D. LHR is by far YOW's largest overseas destination in terms of demand/O&D traffic. Yield is almost always higher on origin & destination pax.

I'd imagine Paris is 2nd by a wide margin, but I'd hazard a guess that at least 50% of YOW-CDG traffic is leaked to YUL (via those AF buses, Via Rail and driving).

I sure hope the new VP of Biz Development & Marketing (whoever he/she is as I have yet to hear an announcement) makes the return of YOW-FRA service their #1 priority and landing YOW-MIA on AA with an E75 the #2 priority and YOW-ATL on DL the #3 priority.
     
     
  #1226  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2015, 1:05 PM
Dominion301 Dominion301 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,774
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgera View Post
High tech sector picking up is what I think ... TB growth tends to parallel tech industry
Another thing to keep in mind in terms of TB growth is YOW-Florida (mostly) leisure traffic, including AC's YOW-MCO operating on Saturdays in May for the first time ever and AC's YOW-FLL now year-round weekend service which started in May too. That's an extra 30 flights to/from Florida that didn't exist last year on E90 equipment (May this year had 5 Saturdays & Sundays this year). Assuming a conservative 75% load factor, that's an extra 2,200 TB pax for the month of May there alone.
     
     
  #1227  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2015, 1:46 PM
bikegypsy's Avatar
bikegypsy bikegypsy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 985
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominion301 View Post
In terms of connections, FRA is way better, but in terms of yield to AC, I'm guessing LHR is more lucrative. A couple of years ago (can't find the source, sorry), I remember reading that over 50% of YOW-LHR traffic is O&D, whereas YOW-FRA is only 15% O&D. LHR is by far YOW's largest overseas destination in terms of demand/O&D traffic. Yield is almost always higher on origin & destination pax.

I'd imagine Paris is 2nd by a wide margin, but I'd hazard a guess that at least 50% of YOW-CDG traffic is leaked to YUL (via those AF buses, Via Rail and driving).

I sure hope the new VP of Biz Development & Marketing (whoever he/she is as I have yet to hear an announcement) makes the return of YOW-FRA service their #1 priority and landing YOW-MIA on AA with an E75 the #2 priority and YOW-ATL on DL the #3 priority.
I wonder what are the actual numbers. When I was in the travel industry 15 years ago, the demand appeared very high. I was stunned by what YUL was sucking out of YOW. I wouldn't be surprised if one of those CDG bound wide bodies departing YUL every day should be doing so from YOW, based on O&D traffic only.
     
     
  #1228  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2015, 3:52 PM
MountainView MountainView is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,168
Quote:
Originally Posted by bikegypsy View Post
I wonder what are the actual numbers. When I was in the travel industry 15 years ago, the demand appeared very high. I was stunned by what YUL was sucking out of YOW. I wouldn't be surprised if one of those CDG bound wide bodies departing YUL every day should be doing so from YOW, based on O&D traffic only.
During weekdays there are three coach buses from Ottawa to YUL. Two operated by Air France and one operated by KLM. So anywhere from 10-25% of the YUL-CDG/AMS flights could be filled with people who bused from Ottawa. This doesn't even count people who booked their ticket YUL-XXX and drive or train there. The coach buses are for people who book on AF/KLM website.

If anyone is interested the buses have 'flight numbers' too. AF311, AF313, and KL300.
     
     
  #1229  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2015, 5:32 PM
bikegypsy's Avatar
bikegypsy bikegypsy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 985
Quote:
Originally Posted by MountainView View Post
During weekdays there are three coach buses from Ottawa to YUL. Two operated by Air France and one operated by KLM. So anywhere from 10-25% of the YUL-CDG/AMS flights could be filled with people who bused from Ottawa. This doesn't even count people who booked their ticket YUL-XXX and drive or train there. The coach buses are for people who book on AF/KLM website.

If anyone is interested the buses have 'flight numbers' too. AF311, AF313, and KL300.
Nor does it count the ones using AC.
     
     
  #1230  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2015, 6:51 PM
HighwayStar's Avatar
HighwayStar HighwayStar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: PHX (by way of YOW)
Posts: 1,200
Quote:
Originally Posted by MountainView View Post
During weekdays there are three coach buses from Ottawa to YUL. Two operated by Air France and one operated by KLM. So anywhere from 10-25% of the YUL-CDG/AMS flights could be filled with people who bused from Ottawa. This doesn't even count people who booked their ticket YUL-XXX and drive or train there. The coach buses are for people who book on AF/KLM website.

If anyone is interested the buses have 'flight numbers' too. AF311, AF313, and KL300.
Almost certainly the low end of that. There are 3 AF flights a day, hence the 3 buses... there is also one KLM flight which departs within a 1/2 hour of one of the AF flights, so they probably double up on a bus.

AF runs 2x772 and 1x343, KLM runs 1x300 for a total of 1133 seats per day. 10% of that is 113/3 or 38 people per bus. I'm not sure what one bus would hold (50-60 maybe?)... but I have a hard time picturing it stuffed to the max.

Has anybody been on one and could comment on the bus "load factor" ???
     
     
  #1231  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2015, 7:22 PM
Radster Radster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chelsea
Posts: 997
I have taken the KLM bus a few times over the past decade, and I can attest that the load factor was always between 50-75% each time.
     
     
  #1232  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2015, 7:22 PM
Norman Bates Norman Bates is online now
Living With My Mother
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by HighwayStar View Post
Almost certainly the low end of that. There are 3 AF flights a day, hence the 3 buses... there is also one KLM flight which departs within a 1/2 hour of one of the AF flights, so they probably double up on a bus.

AF runs 2x772 and 1x343, KLM runs 1x300 for a total of 1133 seats per day. 10% of that is 113/3 or 38 people per bus. I'm not sure what one bus would hold (50-60 maybe?)... but I have a hard time picturing it stuffed to the max.

Has anybody been on one and could comment on the bus "load factor" ???
Took the air France bus last June. Maybe 20 folks on board. Coming back in July there were fewer. Maybe 14. Seems like some folks got picked up on the way home from dorval. The driver had a list and kept waiting - but in the end gave up. Incidentally it was the same driver that brought me there in June. Very skilled operator.
     
     
  #1233  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2015, 9:30 PM
YOWetal YOWetal is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norman Bates View Post
Took the air France bus last June. Maybe 20 folks on board. Coming back in July there were fewer. Maybe 14. Seems like some folks got picked up on the way home from dorval. The driver had a list and kept waiting - but in the end gave up. Incidentally it was the same driver that brought me there in June. Very skilled operator.
I have taken the bus twice in the past year and 15-20 was about average for my experience too. I used to take the train from Kingston years ago to Dorval, but it seems to be more of a hassle now with an extra shuttle involved. Generally I drive once a year for a flight from Momtreal usually because of a direct flight. For example It is easier and faster to drive to Montreal and fly direct to Paris than connect out of Ottawa.
     
     
  #1234  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2015, 8:49 PM
sgera sgera is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 205
Anyone know why the area by the American gates is fenced off? Looks like construction. They actually removed a gate too. Someone earlier mentioned this was a site for a hotel?
     
     
  #1235  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2015, 12:44 AM
NOWINYOW NOWINYOW is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 479
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgera View Post
Anyone know why the area by the American gates is fenced off? Looks like construction. They actually removed a gate too. Someone earlier mentioned this was a site for a hotel?

"Gates 1 & 2" are just hard stands without jetway. I'm wondering if there are preparations to install jetways for 1 & 2?

Currently jetway for gate 3 has been removed. Maybe there's some prep work required before the next phase of expansion?

I noticed all of that a few weeks ago, but only recently was the jetbridge for #3 moved.
     
     
  #1236  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2015, 1:05 PM
Dominion301 Dominion301 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,774
Quote:
Originally Posted by bikegypsy View Post
Nor does it count the ones using AC.
AC would count out of YOW if they're departing YOW and connecting at YUL, but not if they make their way from Ottawa to depart directly from YUL.

On the leisure side, I bet Corsair and especially TS suck a lot of YOW-CDG pax. It always boggles my mind how much TS neglect Ottawa...as they know Ottawa transatlantic leisure pax are still suckers for driving the 2 hours to YUL.

Europe Airpost serves YHZ-CDG weekly with an intermediate stop at DUB on a 73G. I bet they could easily fill 2 73Gs per week out of YOW during the summer months with an intermediate 45 minute-1 hour stop at St. Pierre...off the coast of Newfoundland and who are also lacking a Paris connection. Considering the St. Pierre airport has an 1,800m/5,900 ft runway at sea level in a locale that never gets warmer than 26C, that should be plenty long enough for a 73G to make the 5 hour leg to CDG. Landing Europe Airport would be true out-of-the-box thinking by the Airport Authority.
     
     
  #1237  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2015, 1:17 PM
Dominion301 Dominion301 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,774
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOWINYOW View Post
"Gates 1 & 2" are just hard stands without jetway. I'm wondering if there are preparations to install jetways for 1 & 2?

Currently jetway for gate 3 has been removed. Maybe there's some prep work required before the next phase of expansion?

I noticed all of that a few weeks ago, but only recently was the jetbridge for #3 moved.
Yeah I noticed that too a couple of weeks ago while at the airport. By the looks of it, jetbridges are being installed at gates 1 & 2. I wonder if the bridge formerly on 3 that at the time I was there, was sitting by 1, will be re-located to 1? It could also be that the bridge from 3 is getting replaced at the same time as 1 & 2 get new bridges. The Airport Authority are gradually replacing the DEW bridges which were installed on 3, 5, 6 and 11 to 18. Given the stagnant pax numbers (and fewer transborder flights nowadays), I doubt the airport will need to add more gates any time soon.

About half of them have already been replaced with I'm guessing ThyssenKrupp (although they look slightly different, so maybe they're Jetway Systems bridges) like is installed in the newer wing of the terminal (i.e. the bridges in the 20s). From memory a couple of weeks ago, 13, 14, 16 & 17 have already been replaced. What's interesting is the gate number signs for the old DEW bridges have been re-installed on the new bridges. Ottawa's DEW Engineering no longer manufacture loading bridges.
     
     
  #1238  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2015, 1:24 PM
McC's Avatar
McC McC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,057
.
     
     
  #1239  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2015, 3:03 PM
bikegypsy's Avatar
bikegypsy bikegypsy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 985
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominion301 View Post
AC would count out of YOW if they're departing YOW and connecting at YUL, but not if they make their way from Ottawa to depart directly from YUL.

On the leisure side, I bet Corsair and especially TS suck a lot of YOW-CDG pax. It always boggles my mind how much TS neglect Ottawa...as they know Ottawa transatlantic leisure pax are still suckers for driving the 2 hours to YUL.

Europe Airpost serves YHZ-CDG weekly with an intermediate stop at DUB on a 73G. I bet they could easily fill 2 73Gs per week out of YOW during the summer months with an intermediate 45 minute-1 hour stop at St. Pierre...off the coast of Newfoundland and who are also lacking a Paris connection. Considering the St. Pierre airport has an 1,800m/5,900 ft runway at sea level in a locale that never gets warmer than 26C, that should be plenty long enough for a 73G to make the 5 hour leg to CDG. Landing Europe Airport would be true out-of-the-box thinking by the Airport Authority.
That's pretty much it. The canadian airline industry in respect to YOW transborder and international is "we have to serve it if not someone else (american companies) will." And when I used to work in the industry in my early 20s, what dominated conversations with Montreal package tour companies at industry fairs in Ottawa was always the times and ways to get to Dorval. They saw Ottawa as a satellite city of Montreal. You can't blame them as it is just the nature of the business after all. KLM use to fly a 747 3 or 4 time weekly in the early 90s... Load factors were great and my contacts at KLM confirmed that they had plans to bring the flight to daily during the summer months. Who killed it? YUL and AC. But YOW has done a good job at chipping away at YUL's domination in the region over the years, although they still have a long way ahead. YOW's number's should be comparable to YEG's. CDG or AMS is just a matter of time.

Last edited by bikegypsy; Aug 18, 2015 at 4:53 PM.
     
     
  #1240  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2015, 8:56 PM
YowItaliano YowItaliano is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by bikegypsy View Post
That's pretty much it. The canadian airline industry in respect to YOW transborder and international is "we have to serve it if not someone else (american companies) will." And when I used to work in the industry in my early 20s, what dominated conversations with Montreal package tour companies at industry fairs in Ottawa was always the times and ways to get to Dorval. They saw Ottawa as a satellite city of Montreal. You can't blame them as it is just the nature of the business after all. KLM use to fly a 747 3 or 4 time weekly in the early 90s... Load factors were great and my contacts at KLM confirmed that they had plans to bring the flight to daily during the summer months. Who killed it? YUL and AC. But YOW has done a good job at chipping away at YUL's domination in the region over the years, although they still have a long way ahead. YOW's number's should be comparable to YEG's. CDG or AMS is just a matter of time.
I flew my family and myself to Venice (VCE) last January with KLM instead of Air Canada due to the lack of YOW-FRA flight. My parents, who spend their winters in Italy continue to do so as well.
The bus trip-"flight" is a pain, but the savings plus the lack of the 1 stopper in FRA has made us forget about our Aeroplan points.
Air Canada better think twice before Air France/KLM take advantage and bring a 1 stopper for us to either AMS or CDG!!
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:10 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.