Quote:
Originally Posted by Caliplanner1
Still trying to figure out which intelligent electorate voted in the Clark administration and why?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rico
Not really, I do think she is a terrible Premier (currently tied with Glen Clark as the worst in my lifetime) but I realize many people could have legitimate reasons to vote for her.....but it is obvious she is profoundly anti transit (although she won't say it) and will place as many road blocks to transit spending as she can.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by csbvan
I would say more than anti-transit she is anti-Vancouver which is dangerous for our economy. Very unlike her predecessor in her anti-urban and anti-transit mentality.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caliplanner1
....how about anti the poor (as seen in how she treated the K-12 public school education strike recently)!? That aside every educated first grader knows that inadequate transportation and congestion cripples the economy!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by queetz@home
I wouldn't say she is anti-transit as she did make the Evergreen Line possible. Nor would I say she is anti-Vancouver but it is Vancouver that is anti-Christy. Note that the Province is still committed to its share, so Vancouver simply has to pony up their share for the Broadway Line.
But she owes Vancouver nothing and as the saying goes, you reap what you sow. It would have helped if Vancouver-Point Grey wasn't so self centred and relied on the survey to vote for an NDP candidate to ensure they have an MLA in a sitting government. If they simply took a leap of faith, or better yet, realize that the BC NDP was a big mistake after Adrian Dix's infamous Kinder Morgan commentary, not only would they have had an MLA in a sitting government, but a Premier at that. Which should more than be enough to push for the Broadway Line, maybe even cancel the referendum altogether.
As for the economy, the BC economy as a whole still relies mostly on natural resources, which is mostly, if not all outside of the Metro Vancouver region. It will take a lot of really innovative companies enough to fill many tall office towers that will make BC not so reliant on wood and mining, but we are not even close to there yet even if every currently proposed office project is filled to the brim.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12
Yes, this. Literally seems to hate the economic heart of the province, while pushing remote, far off plans like LNG.
|
The fact we can't seem to lock down the type of person Christy Clark is, is exactly my problem with her.
I have no idea the kind of person Clark is. Even though Grodon Campbell was 2 faced, you knew exactly who those 2 faces were: with one he loved Vancouver and the Province and wanted great things for it (he built us a lot of stuff), the other he loved his friends and business supporters (he cut a lot of taxes making us take on debt for those things). With Glen Clark, everyone knew he loved his cronies and the public sector (and you loved him or hated him for that). Ujjal Dosanjh is a politician for the sake of being a politician and was lucky and was able to balanced the budget mostly to look good for his next gig in federal politics (he knew the NDP would be trounced and basically started campaigning for his MP job on day one). And Mike Harcourt didn't like Bill Vander Zalm as much as everyone else (and also hated "cheats and deadbeats"), and won by being more center right (even though he was NDP) than the super-right Socreds.
But Christy Clark, I have no idea. I came up with decent once sentence descriptions of past premiers, but with her, I have no idea how to describe her.
I don't think she is anti-transit, or anti-Vancouver, or anti-poor (at least not more anti-poor than the overall electorate in BC). I don't think she is pro-anything either. She just seems indifferent to everything.
She was out of politics and had an opportunity to get a pretty good job, one with lots of future potential. All she has to do is not completely screw it up, and she will be set for life. She can become an MP, a senator, or sit on a board of directors somewhere.
She got Evergreen off the ground and has set in motion GMT replacement (so not anti Vancouver or transit). She has promised money for the Broadway line, but isn't going to go out of her way and make it happen and have the province pay for the whole thing, because I feel she doesn't want brash spending decisions to be on her resume when she applies for her future jobs. No emotion one way or the other, she is just looking out for number one (herself).