Quote:
Originally Posted by 240glt
^ the permit does not follow the intent of the RA7 redevelopment zoning that was put in place several years ago, not does it follow the intent of the Stadium ARP. It is absolutely a planning matter, the material interference issue should have been the icing on the cake
|
Development rights under zoning supersedes any policy / directive from an overlay or statutory plan. The Development Officer 'may' consider these when evaluating a development permit, but they are not bound by them.