HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3521  
Old Posted Aug 6, 2015, 8:54 PM
Nathan's Avatar
Nathan Nathan is offline
Hmm....
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by jigglysquishy View Post
True European townhouses can achieve a density of 15,000 - 20,000 people/km^2. That's a higher density than any neighbourhood in Canada outside of central Toronto/Montreal/Vancouver and 10x the density of our suburbs.

It's half the cost of highrises and has better walkability/street life. That should be the standard throughout the City.

No argument on Martensville/Warman growing. They're absolutely booming, largely due to the proximity to the north industrial area.

White City/Balgonie/Pilot Butte are all booming too, just not at the rate of Martensville/Warman.

The City of Saskatoon wants 50% infill. They have no control over the growth outside their boundaries. Same with Regina, though they're only targetting 15% infill.

The province is fully within their rights to deny development to the RM of Corman Park and the RM of Edenwold. They just choose to allow the development to go through without a financing plan in place.
The problem is that although denser development is ideal, large segments of the population don't want it. This is what can lead to an explosion in growth in suburban/bedroom communities. Some people are motivated by cheaper land/homes (which may not be as true anymore), but there are more and more people willing to live just outside the cities so they can have land and space.

The larger the city, the further out these developments are and the less likely that they will be an option... But Regina and Saskatoon are both millions of people below that threshold.

I'm not saying we should throw densification ideals out the window, but a hardline approach where high density is the "standard" throughout the city is likely going to backfire. Both due to the above and also because there are likely enough of the type of people that don't want forced density that they could vote in a majority of councillors with a similar viewpoint, which could then lead a more low-density focused direction.

And I say this as someone whose ideal living arrangement is in the dense downtown condo/apartment tower type of housing.

Central areas though (downtown, rail yards, warehouse district, transition area)... bring on the high density standard, be they townhouse style or tower depending on the location.

Quote:
Originally Posted by thefourthtower View Post
Last time I checked this was a Regina site , preach at river landing
It's a general development/architecture site... And this is a Regina thread within that; however, comparisons to other cities/buildings is well within the realm of acceptability. There's no need to be so aggressively anti-anywhere else.
     
     
  #3522  
Old Posted Aug 6, 2015, 9:40 PM
one_brick_at_a_time's Avatar
one_brick_at_a_time one_brick_at_a_time is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Regina/Toronto
Posts: 2,389
What is going into the new building being built next to Swiss chalet at southland mall?
     
     
  #3523  
Old Posted Aug 6, 2015, 9:57 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,038
Quote:
Originally Posted by one_brick_at_a_time View Post
What is going into the new building being built next to Swiss chalet at southland mall?
Chop Steakhouse
     
     
  #3524  
Old Posted Aug 6, 2015, 10:09 PM
Dan0myte Dan0myte is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 927
This idea that you can force a city to be dense by political means is little to 'pie in the sky' for me. It's been said many times but you can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink. For as much restrictions and limits the municipal government could put on building, there's always going to be the bedroom communities waiting to steal the land sales, the people and the tax dollars they are going to pay over the next 50 years. The city has to remain viable and open to all development in order to ensure it's survival and growth.
     
     
  #3525  
Old Posted Aug 6, 2015, 10:28 PM
Crisis's Avatar
Crisis Crisis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,331
Quote:
Originally Posted by one_brick_at_a_time View Post
What is going into the new building being built next to Swiss chalet at southland mall?
If it's the location that I think you're talking about, it's a Chop Steakhouse.
     
     
  #3526  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2015, 4:06 AM
UPP UPP is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Regina, Canada
Posts: 592
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan0myte View Post
This idea that you can force a city to be dense by political means is little to 'pie in the sky' for me. It's been said many times but you can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink. For as much restrictions and limits the municipal government could put on building, there's always going to be the bedroom communities waiting to steal the land sales, the people and the tax dollars they are going to pay over the next 50 years. The city has to remain viable and open to all development in order to ensure it's survival and growth.
And quite frankly, gas is still too cheap.

On another note, I saw on the news today something about a major commercial development for the East end. It looked to be north of TCH/Vic basically from the current city's edge to around near the old Wild Slides. I thought the big commercial centre was supposed to be south of TCH. Anyone heard of this?
     
     
  #3527  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2015, 4:22 AM
Treesplease Treesplease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 990
Quote:
Originally Posted by StealthGirl View Post
City Planning commission is going to be discussing expanding the city plan to include a parcel of land at Tower Road for retail development. I'm not sure they can afford to do this, but even if the planning commission shot it down, I don't see our council considering the cost of a pumping station and all the infrastructure. I get that they aren't looking at development right away, but I'm still not convinced this is a good idea.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchew...y-be-coming-in-new-regina-area-1.3179776
^^^previous post
     
     
  #3528  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2015, 1:26 PM
BrutallyDishonest2 BrutallyDishonest2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by UPP View Post
And quite frankly, gas is still too cheap.

On another note, I saw on the news today something about a major commercial development for the East end. It looked to be north of TCH/Vic basically from the current city's edge to around near the old Wild Slides. I thought the big commercial centre was supposed to be south of TCH. Anyone heard of this?
You're thinking Harvard's Aurora site. Tower Crossing will be ready first...if Harvard doesn't manage to stop Tower Crossing.
     
     
  #3529  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2015, 3:18 PM
cutterp's Avatar
cutterp cutterp is offline
#1 King Champ
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 261
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefourthtower View Post
For infill housing what do you call the Regina railway lands huge growth there huge
I've held it in for over a year but it's a tough day so I have to say something.

I'm certainly not a grammatical genius but please, please, could you just try to use some punctuation? Are you always posting from a cell phone? I don't understand.
__________________
Paul
Regina, Sk
     
     
  #3530  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2015, 3:51 PM
Rodo Regina Lover Rodo Regina Lover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 219
What are the new developments in Harbour Landing just east of the new McDonalds and just south of the new Canadian Brewhouse?
     
     
  #3531  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2015, 3:58 PM
Dan0myte Dan0myte is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 927
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodo Regina Lover View Post
What are the new developments in Harbour Landing just east of the new McDonalds and just south of the new Canadian Brewhouse?
Site plan has that as the Grasslands Urban Village. "Main street of a small town" feel with angle parking and small shops. North of that is the business park with professional services facing a green space/park.

22-09-2014 2-08-15 PM by dan0myte, on Flickr
     
     
  #3532  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2015, 4:33 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan0myte View Post
Site plan has that as the Grasslands Urban Village. "Main street of a small town" feel with angle parking and small shops. North of that is the business park with professional services facing a green space/park.

22-09-2014 2-08-15 PM by dan0myte, on Flickr
I believe there are also loft style condos planned.

Their is a CGI walkthrough video: http://www.grasslands.ca/lease/village_district.php
     
     
  #3533  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2015, 4:37 PM
StealthGirl's Avatar
StealthGirl StealthGirl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,280
I had heard there was going to be a medical corridor of sorts in HL. FYI doctors and a dentist and something else all in one set of buildings.
     
     
  #3534  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2015, 4:46 PM
OOO AHH OGEMA OOO AHH OGEMA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 97
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan0myte View Post
Site plan has that as the Grasslands Urban Village. "Main street of a small town" feel with angle parking and small shops. North of that is the business park with professional services facing a green space/park.

22-09-2014 2-08-15 PM by dan0myte, on Flickr
the grasslands website has a more updated site plan. The street just north of Golftown and Canadian brewhouse appears to have been realigned to go east west as well.

http://www.grasslands.ca/lease/siteplan.php

Also, can someone tell me how to include a photo inline?
     
     
  #3535  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2015, 5:34 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,038
Quote:
Originally Posted by StealthGirl View Post
I had heard there was going to be a medical corridor of sorts in HL. FYI doctors and a dentist and something else all in one set of buildings.
They are already there near Lancasters
     
     
  #3536  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2015, 7:36 PM
CanadianCentaur's Avatar
CanadianCentaur CanadianCentaur is offline
Briareos Hecatonchires
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Big E
Posts: 3,805
Hi, I have a question to ask you forumers here: Do Regina and Saskatoon have any height restrictions similar to what Edmonton used to have before the City Centre Airport (YXD) shut down for good back in 2013?

Regina International Airport is nearly as close to downtown Regina as YXD was to Edmonton's downtown core, if not as close. And of course John G. Diefenbaker International isn't terribly far from downtown Saskatoon, either. I know both aren't anywhere near as big as Edmonton or Winnipeg, but then again, I don't know. If down the road, should both cities get closer to the 500K mark sometimes later this century...
__________________
Edmonton/Amiskwacîwâskahikan Lat. 53° 34'N Elevation 671 m (2201 ft) Pop. 1,010,899 (2021 city) 1,418,118 (2021 metro) - North America's northernmost metro area over one million.
     
     
  #3537  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2015, 8:01 PM
HomeInMyShoes's Avatar
HomeInMyShoes HomeInMyShoes is offline
arf
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: File 13
Posts: 14,625
Regina does have a height (obstruction) overlay in its zoning laws. That said, the current orientation of the runways do not directly go over downtown so taller buildings than what Edmonton's limit of around 150m would probably not be in play. I am not familiar with the FAR considerations in the core.
__________________

-- “We heal each other with kindness, gentleness and respect.” -- Richard Wagamese
-- “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, Nothing is going to get better. It's not.” -- Dr. Seuss
     
     
  #3538  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2015, 8:26 PM
SkydivePilot SkydivePilot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: REGINA
Posts: 2,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanadianCentaur View Post
Hi, I have a question to ask you forumers here: Do Regina and Saskatoon have any height restrictions similar to what Edmonton used to have before the City Centre Airport (YXD) shut down for good back in 2013?

Regina International Airport is nearly as close to downtown Regina as YXD was to Edmonton's downtown core, if not as close. And of course John G. Diefenbaker International isn't terribly far from downtown Saskatoon, either. I know both aren't anywhere near as big as Edmonton or Winnipeg, but then again, I don't know. If down the road, should both cities get closer to the 500K mark sometimes later this century...
Further to that, Regina's CBD doesn't interfere with IFR approaches/go-around procedures for any runway. Fundamentally speaking, Regina doesn't even require a height limit.
     
     
  #3539  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2015, 8:36 PM
Dan0myte Dan0myte is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 927
Quote:
Originally Posted by OOO AHH OGEMA View Post
Also, can someone tell me how to include a photo inline?
You have to wrap it in IMG tags like this: left square bracket IMG right square bracket http://www.whatever.com/something.jpg left square bracket /IMG right square bracket.


Quote:
Originally Posted by CanadianCentaur
Hi, I have a question to ask you forumers here: Do Regina and Saskatoon have any height restrictions similar to what Edmonton used to have before the City Centre Airport (YXD) shut down for good back in 2013?
AFAIK, residential neighborhoods have a hard ceiling ever since the Roberts Plaza debacle of 1972 of about 10 stories. Downtown height though is unlimited pending City planning board approval. Thanks to our sloppy soil Harvard Developments seems to stick with a rule of thumb of ~270 feet is the max height to avoid problems, which is starting to create a flat-topped skyline in Regina.
     
     
  #3540  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2015, 9:28 PM
HomerSPC's Avatar
HomerSPC HomerSPC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Regina, Sk
Posts: 459
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan0myte View Post
You have to wrap it in IMG tags like this: left square bracket IMG right square bracket http://www.whatever.com/something.jpg left square bracket /IMG right square bracket.
The way you wrote it was incredibly terrible to read. Use the 'noparse' tags around whatever you are trying to show and it will not parse.

[noparse][IMG]http://www.website.com/image.jpg[/IMG][/noparse]

It's far easier to explain things this way than trying to figure out some way to beat the system which makes it incredibly difficult to understand.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:11 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.