Quote:
Originally Posted by tomthumb2
Fort Mac looks like a nice CIS stadium but hosting a CFL regular season game? For a team from Toronto to boot? I'd say Toronto should be embarrassed about that but they don't even give a crap.
Curious to know if anyone agrees with me on this: if the San Francisco 49ers can move to Santa Clara and still be called "San Francisco", maybe its time the Argos move to London or possibly Mississauga? Not even sure if going to BMO can save them at this point. That's where they played for like 30 years and everyone back then said it was a horrible location.
|
We still have one business day and news day so even me in having my doubt's would say for us to hold on here. I say this because T-Baum and Bell leaked their identities and IMO wouldn't if they were far from a deal (unless its all smoke).
The ideal move us the Argos in Vaughn by the Subway expansion in Vaughn's new downtown. The reality is that is the Argos strongest and wealthiest support base and for Vaughn its a easy way to brand the city and draw attention to the new downtown. You can keep the Toronto name by Vaughn can aggressively brand the Stadium (ex Sun Life Park @ Vaughn Center City). This has worked for Arlington who aggressively forces the Cowboys and Rangers to use Arlington when referring to where the team plays its games and not " Suburban Dallas". This would expose a Toronto suburb to many Canadians who outside of Ontario likely have never heard of or knew that Vaughn is bigger than most Canadian cities.
The Bills, Patriots, Cowboys, 49ers, Cardinals, Dolphins, Redskins all play in the suburbs and with football as a destination sport with 10 home dates its easier to pull off. It is the best move for the Argos in Vaughn, Toronto does not deserve a team it doesn't want