Quote:
Originally Posted by kwoldtimer
With Regina and Winnipeg being most at risk, due to overbuilding.
|
I believe they said both due to overbuilding and that prices appreciated much faster than incomes. The first I agree with... Builders in Regina went on a bit of a binge last year. They have definitely scaled back this year, and units are being absorbed (Regina is still one of the fasted growing cities in the country though, so by next year, that overhang will likely be basically gone.
The income vs home price appreciation I have an issue with...
Houses were incredibly undervalued by this metric prior to the swift rise in prices over the last decade. As of 2012, the Regina metro has the 4th highest median family income, and it's been up there for quite some time (
Stats Can) while at the same time, the housing prices are on the lower/mid-range of the spectrum.
Here is a simple affordability comparison I threw together (Housing price / Median Family Income) using the StatsCan information and the information from
this CBC article where info for both cities was available (I used the Ontario-side Ott-Gat income). Family incomes from 2012... March 2015 Real Estate Prices. Not a be all end all of course... but this is why I feel this side of their argument is flawed. I know I've seen something like this before, but couldn't find anything quickly.
Code:
Vancouver 12.232
Toronto 8.446
Victoria 6.214
Hamilton 5.384
Montréal 4.728
Calgary 4.557
Saskatoon 3.897
Edmonton 3.805
Ottawa–Gatineau 3.667
Winnipeg 3.605
Halifax 3.446
Regina 3.290
Québec 3.222
Thunder Bay 2.605
Saint John 2.175