HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7541  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2015, 6:47 PM
EdmTrekker EdmTrekker is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,247
Quote:
Originally Posted by canucklehead2 View Post
All the tower needs to look fantastic is a good coat of whitewash. The architecture itself is still pretty cool. Why the hell do they think something that retro-moderne needs to be tarted up like a streetwalker is beyond me...
I would not have expressed it quite that way...but seeing as you have...I don't disagree.
     
     
  #7542  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2015, 7:19 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 69,151
Hmm, interesting... especially if into Jacobs.
     
     
  #7543  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2015, 7:25 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 69,151
Jasper House


www.edmonton.ca
     
     
  #7544  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2015, 7:57 PM
s211 s211 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
Jasper House


www.edmonton.ca
Is this Brad Lamb's project? If so, it would appear the podium has been reduced, which I would hazard isn't a bad thing.
     
     
  #7545  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2015, 8:02 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 69,151
Yup

1 floor taller, 2 storey podium was always the case no?
     
     
  #7546  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2015, 8:20 PM
SHOFEAR's Avatar
SHOFEAR SHOFEAR is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
Hmm, interesting... especially if into Jacobs.
I assume Jacobs. They still have some room right? It's just Jacobs and Apega currently I believe.
     
     
  #7547  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2015, 8:33 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 69,151
^I don't think Apega moved did they? The building was essentially full, but Williams Eng has some sublet.
     
     
  #7548  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2015, 9:11 PM
s211 s211 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
Yup

1 floor taller, 2 storey podium was always the case no?
I must be confusing it with that two tower proposal that had a 6 or 7 storey podium.
     
     
  #7549  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2015, 9:20 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 69,151
Healy, yes.
     
     
  #7550  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2015, 2:37 AM
CMD UW's Avatar
CMD UW CMD UW is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
^I don't think Apega moved did they? The building was essentially full, but Williams Eng has some sublet.
APEGA is going into Scotia. Jacobs tower has Jacobs, Federal govt department and some other tenant I believe.
     
     
  #7551  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2015, 3:04 AM
Spliff Spliff is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 412
spliff

Quote:
Originally Posted by itom 987 View Post
I don't think it looks that bad anymore.
Its not that bad. Scandinavian buildings add touches of colour to help with the winter blahs - maybe this will do the same.
     
     
  #7552  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2015, 3:16 AM
Kevin_foster's Avatar
Kevin_foster Kevin_foster is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,072
Chateau... yeah that looks horrible. Oh god that red is like salmon pink; and will definitely turn pink with some sun damage.

Anyone know if the la ronde is going to be a few nice penthouses?
     
     
  #7553  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2015, 3:18 AM
Kevin_foster's Avatar
Kevin_foster Kevin_foster is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spliff View Post
Its not that bad. Scandinavian buildings add touches of colour to help with the winter blahs - maybe this will do the same.
I think its more of their airplanes that have the same colors.
     
     
  #7554  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2015, 3:22 AM
etown etown is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 257
I just got a letter for a community open house for rezoning from Stantec and WestOak Development for a residential building : 10 storey (2 retail) for 11730-87 Ave.

I think some retail would benefit the area, 10 floors seems a bit much since the Bentley only got 4 next door. If it goes ahead I hope the retail is retail and not medical offices.
     
     
  #7555  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2015, 3:26 AM
EdmTrekker EdmTrekker is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,247
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin_foster View Post
Chateau... yeah that looks horrible. Oh god that red is like salmon pink; and will definitely turn pink with some sun damage.

Anyone know if the la ronde is going to be a few nice penthouses?
La Ronde was recently renovated and all furniture replaced.
Chateau has now renovated and created a Concierge Floor (s)
Chateaubriand for 2, stable side service is still available and is super good....and a bargain up in LaRonde
     
     
  #7556  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2015, 3:47 AM
Black Star Black Star is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,259
Glenora Lives........

While InHouse intends to build upon the existing concrete structure, the final design could potentially be quite different from the original three-tower condominium project, but will incorporate residential commercial and retail space.

While designs for the new development on the site won't be expected until at least July, Smith estimated the cost of completing the project at over $100 million.


http://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/04/17/ed...-life-into-glenora-skyline-condo-project
     
     
  #7557  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2015, 5:23 AM
Black Star Black Star is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,259
Lamphier: Downtown Edmonton still humming
Low oil prices a bigger issue in Calgary


http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/edmo...monton+still+humming/10982411/story.html
     
     
  #7558  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2015, 5:41 AM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 6,895
River Crossing – building a new story for Rossdale
http://doniveson.ca/2015/04/17/river-crossing-building-a-new-story-for-rossdale/

Quote:
On Wednesday, City Council had a chance to discuss the West Rossdale development and refine a vision for the area we’re now calling ‘River Crossing‘.

River Crossing’s new vision asks us to step back and consider the Rossdale development in the context of the wider area and the incredibly significant role the site has played in our city’s history. For many years we were overwhelmed by the complicated pieces that made up the area and wondered if it would ever be possible to see a financial return on our investment at that bend in the river. River Crossing shifts our perspective to something much bigger and much more important: a storyline for a transformative development.

At the end of the Wednesday’s meeting, City Council unanimously passed a layered motion that allows us to move forward and to (finally) start making some key decisions. Among these are confirming the province’s interest in lands for a Legislature promenade, analyzing how existing city-funded infrastructure programs might be leveraged to help improve the development picture, and focusing our efforts on city-building priorities rather than just trying to turn a profit on the real estate.

Baseball fans will also find comfort in the fact that we are going to actively seek out a team for Telus Field (via an RFP), but if we come up short we will have no choice but to move on to a Plan B that re-imagines baseball, and the park, in an entirely different form.

I’m also excited by the ask of City Council for a historical interpretation plan that will help bring the River Crossing’s rich history to life. The story of our city was first written in the River Crossing district; not only were the earliest fur trading forts located in the area, but archaeologists working on the Walterdale bridge project discovered a 1,400 year old Aboriginal campsite on the south side of the river, painting an incredible picture of life in pre-historic Edmonton. These are stories we simply cannot ignore in developing this area.

There is, as well, the issue of the canal project. While I continue to have questions about the costs of this project, both short and long-term, there is interest on Council in considering amenities that could bring about an increase in the value of the Rossdale lands. Having said that, I am curious about other ideas that the market might bring to the table in order to take the River Crossing vision even higher. As we move forward, I will push to ensure that any additional development concepts are given due consideration; the worst thing we can do is to leave a great idea in an envelope, on the table.

We will not enter into the development of this area hastily. I realize this may elicit a groan from those who have waited decades to see something, anything, happen in Rossdale. But Wednesday’s motion ensures we do it properly, and in the right order, instead of letting ourselves continue to be overwhelmed by the parts that make up – in fact – a much bigger sum.
     
     
  #7559  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2015, 5:43 AM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 6,895
     
     
  #7560  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2015, 5:12 PM
s211 s211 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,519
Quote:
Originally Posted by CMD UW View Post
APEGA is going into Scotia.
That's pretty small floor plates for a sizeable engineering firm, is it not? I'm not quite sure I follow their choice from a space optimization and efficiency perspective.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:06 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.