HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


    Telus Garden Residential Tower in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Vancouver Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1781  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2015, 4:18 AM
nickbeaulieu nickbeaulieu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 257
It's funny, you've got this nice modern building and right across the street is a crumbling parking garage...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1782  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2015, 4:27 AM
mcminsen's Avatar
mcminsen mcminsen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Downtown Vancouver
Posts: 9,979
Looks like they raised the crane closest to Robson Street (on the left). It gives a better sense of the impending height of the condo tower. I'm guessing that the final height will be a little over twice what we see now. I hope I can still get it all in one shot by the time it tops out.

BTW, I was at the open house about the sign that they want to operate on the office tower over Georgia Street. I was able to glean a couple of things from the people there. They acknowledge that they have taken a bit of a chance in building the sign first and are counting on city hall to approve the sign by-law amendments based on input from the public after the meeting tonight. The amendments referred to on the information boards were rather vague so I got clarification that they will be specific to the exact specifications of the Telus sign. Kind of like a custom amendment. At least that's my understanding coming away from the meeting tonight.


Feb.11 '15, my pic
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1783  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2015, 5:12 AM
Locked In's Avatar
Locked In Locked In is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,977
^ Thanks for the info, and nice shot.
------
My photo from today:


IMG_4983 by 604 City, on Flickr
__________________
My Flickr Photostream
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1784  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2015, 5:41 AM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,516
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcminsen View Post
BTW, I was at the open house about the sign that they want to operate on the office tower over Georgia Street. I was able to glean a couple of things from the people there. They acknowledge that they have taken a bit of a chance in building the sign first and are counting on city hall to approve the sign by-law amendments based on input from the public after the meeting tonight.
Only Westbank could get away with something like that. Nothing like favoured nation status to get away with whatever you please.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1785  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2015, 2:12 PM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,429
Regarding those led lights on the overhang. They do in fact change colour. I walked by and saw a rainbow of colour
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1786  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2015, 2:31 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 18,004
This project with regards to lighting and the public realm is everything that the Eatons reno should have been.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1787  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2015, 10:10 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,725
Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
Only Westbank could get away with something like that. Nothing like favoured nation status to get away with whatever you please.
Also sounds vaguely like TELUS ordering massive signs for BC Place Stadium before a deal was signed, then getting rejected.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Locked In View Post
^ Thanks for the info, and nice shot.
------
My photo from today:


IMG_4983 by 604 City, on Flickr
Nice. I see trees up there - also noticed a bunch planted on top of the podium, too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1788  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2015, 11:31 PM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,408
Why do they even need a bylaw exception for the screen? There is no residential buildings in the direction of the screen. It's just offices that are empty when they turn it on. The Georgia is already two blocks down from Telus Garden and it won't be bright, so I will be very surprised if they don't get the permission they are looking for.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1789  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2015, 12:03 AM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
Why do they even need a bylaw exception for the screen? There is no residential buildings in the direction of the screen. It's just offices that are empty when they turn it on. The Georgia is already two blocks down from Telus Garden and it won't be bright, so I will be very surprised if they don't get the permission they are looking for.
It's Vancouver. Any tiny thing that emits a bit of light, sound or block mounains are deemed offensive.

If the developer and City doesn't go through this, the New Yaletown folks may bring this case to court and we could end up having an abandoned projector screen.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1790  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2015, 3:49 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,516
Hearing from close sources that this project is now eight months behind schedule.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1791  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2015, 6:27 PM
phesto phesto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: yvr/bwi
Posts: 2,699
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1792  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2015, 7:38 PM
mukmuk64 mukmuk64 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 132
Quote:
Originally Posted by phesto View Post
I dunno it brings up some good points. Why exactly are we wanting to bend over backward to allow this building to project ads in our face? The "other cities allow it" isn't good enough for me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1793  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2015, 7:46 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by mukmuk64 View Post
I dunno it brings up some good points. Why exactly are we wanting to bend over backward to allow this building to project ads in our face? The "other cities allow it" isn't good enough for me.
Be careful. Lights and ads count as culture to a lot of people on this forum.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1794  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2015, 9:01 PM
phesto phesto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: yvr/bwi
Posts: 2,699
Quote:
Originally Posted by mukmuk64 View Post
I dunno it brings up some good points. Why exactly are we wanting to bend over backward to allow this building to project ads in our face? The "other cities allow it" isn't good enough for me.
I'm actually indifferent to the proposal, I just thought the hyperbole was a bit much. "Scores of families will suffer".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1795  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2015, 9:01 PM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,481
i think lights and things like NEON signs are great for a city. i love old Granville Street, many a decade ago, with more NEON then Las Vegas. i love, just love NEON myself. that glow that LED's just cant reproduce; nothing but actual NEON can look like that.

i wouldn't like that screen showing Ads though. i see enough Ads in the day i don't need and don't want TV Ads on the side of a building. a TV screen showing interesting colours, patterns and different kinds of designs, that wouldn't be bad.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1796  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2015, 9:08 PM
GlassCity's Avatar
GlassCity GlassCity is offline
Rational urbanist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 5,270
Lights are psychologically stimulating and create excitement. There's a reason night clubs have flashing lights and lasers of many different colours. In scientific terms, it turns people up. It doesn't matter if the lights are ads or not. And with a city's downtown supposed to be the big, exciting part of the city, the more lights the more people get that sense when they're there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1797  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2015, 9:18 PM
mukmuk64 mukmuk64 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 132
Quote:
Originally Posted by phesto View Post
I'm actually indifferent to the proposal, I just thought the hyperbole was a bit much. "Scores of families will suffer".
Oh yes on hyperbole we very much agree on.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1798  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2015, 9:27 PM
mukmuk64 mukmuk64 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 132
Quote:
Originally Posted by VancouverOfTheFuture View Post
i think lights and things like NEON signs are great for a city. i love old Granville Street, many a decade ago, with more NEON then Las Vegas. i love, just love NEON myself. that glow that LED's just cant reproduce; nothing but actual NEON can look like that.

i wouldn't like that screen showing Ads though. i see enough Ads in the day i don't need and don't want TV Ads on the side of a building. a TV screen showing interesting colours, patterns and different kinds of designs, that wouldn't be bad.
Yes clearing Granville of its fabulous neon heritage was one of the worst decisions the City ever made.

There is a big difference though between a big glowing VOGUE sign and a big TV cycling advertisements.

I hope the city doesn't rush through this decision. One of the points that CityHallWatch makes is actually quite relevant: The Councillors just unanimously voted to have the city develop an outdoor lighting strategy for future development. It wouldn't make any sense to approve this before City staff has time to present a plan to Council.

Edit: From what I've read it seems like there's still conflicting info out there about whether or not there is any possibility of ads. It'd be nice to hear some clarity on this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1799  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2015, 11:18 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,725
No one even notices the electronic billboard over at Burrard Bridge any more.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1800  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2015, 11:33 PM
Prometheus's Avatar
Prometheus Prometheus is offline
Reason and Freedom
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 4,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by mukmuk64 View Post

There is a big difference though between a big glowing VOGUE sign and a big TV cycling advertisements.
Yet the arguments and emotions of the anti-video screen crowd of today and anti-neon sign crusaders of the past remain the same.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:46 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.