Quote:
Originally Posted by lio45
Your place behind every other major city? Aren't you squarely in the "Big 4-6"?
|
As in, "put in our place." Post a skyline pic - Skyline not tall enough. Post an aerial pic - Downtown not dense enough. Post a street pic - Neighbourhoods not lively enough. New downtown residential towers announced - Streets not complete enough. LRT expansion announced - LRT not metro enough. Mention a leading industrial sector for which we are overlooked - Industries not leader-y enough.
Terrain too flat. Too many commie blocks. River not blue enough. Residents not white-collar enough.
These are all things that have been said when Edmonton comes up in conversation, or when photos are posted of Edmonton that I can remember over recent months and years.
It just gets so tiresome.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lio45
Besides, the 🞵🞵🞵🞵-measuring contests are far from a main serious feature of the Canada section IMO. Maybe jokingly though; I often see users ridiculing the idea.
|
I think the people who get involved in them do take it seriously, though; why else would a post by someone subjectively ranking a city skyline over another spawn 6+ pages about how wrong he is, how ridiculous that their city was ranked lower, about the only "true" way to measure a skyline is by some other subjective metric and moving goalpost, etc.?
I know a lot of people take it as a joke - I know I do (but hey I'm from Edmonton, I'm just happy when anyone includes our 150m-capped skyline in any kind of ranking of their favourites

). But that doesn't make it any less tiresome when it occurs again and again, unfailingly once a month at minimum.