CHICAGO | Highrise Projects & Construction - Page 873

wrab · #**17441** Posted **Jan 28, 2015, 7:20 PM**

Yes, Joshpabstphoto - that's a very nice golden-hour pic, & the slow-shutter auto headlights are a great touch IMHO. Keep up the good work!

ChiTownWonder · #**17442** Posted **Jan 28, 2015, 7:25 PM**

Welcome Josh and A&K!! It would be great if another skyscraper wall is developed like on the north side of the park. I don't think chicagos main skyline will change too much, but it will stretch farther southward, westward, and northward.

SamInTheLoop · #**17443** Posted **Jan 28, 2015, 8:05 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright

^^^ I'm afraid to try that again. I'm certain I'll just be embarrassingly off mark. It'll never be as good as the "oh shit" when I saw the actual rendering for the first time, lol.

Well.....I've perhaps never before seen an opening bar set quite that high....so I won't try to tell you there's no pressure or anything! Talk about not 'anchoring' others' future expectations of yourself.....

SamInTheLoop · #**17444** Posted **Jan 28, 2015, 8:14 PM**

Just wondering if we've had (will have) any official high-rise construction starts in January......anyone spot movement at GEMS II? (as of a week ago, there was no activity on the site) The other potential one I can think of - and LVDW's photo from Skybridge last week reminded of it, as it will soon be rising in the foreground from that vantage point - is the 108 N Jefferson hotel project, where I think there was some site prep work going on in the last month or two. Any foundation equipment show up there yet?

Ryanrule · #**17445** Posted **Jan 28, 2015, 8:18 PM**

9th and state?

Arm&Kedzie · #**17446** Posted **Jan 28, 2015, 8:43 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by munchymunch

WOW! Thank you very exciting news. Do you know if it will take up the whole parcel, or is there still room for phase 2?

Again Thankyou.

It takes up 1/2 the parcel. It is on the corner of Roosevelt and Indiana.

As far as the design - I think Ardelicas description that it looks like a slightly shorter sears tower is pretty accurate. It has many slender square terminations... over a dozen. First termination is around the 30th floor. It is all right corners - no curves. Slightly A-symmetrical massing. Long vertical cladding strips that seem to have at least 2 variations that are in large vertical blocks. It appears the side facing the park has a flat face and no step backs on that side. Very cool profile. There is no info on the color of cladding or windows.

Steely Dan · #**17447** Posted **Jan 28, 2015, 9:08 PM**

30 second sketch-up.

right track or wrong track?

Skyguy_7 · #**17448** Posted **Jan 28, 2015, 9:11 PM**

^ Nice, Steely. Your rendering would be the South elevation. LVDW, we're waiting. It's been 30 minutes....

Also, great contribution, joshpabstphoto. Arkadia might never look better!

sentinel · #**17449** Posted **Jan 28, 2015, 9:17 PM**

Steely, you beat me to it! Nice sketch!

I think it makes sense for the southern face to have the staggered-height effect, in order to take advantage of amount of sunlight - Assuming these are condos and not rental, then it would be a no-brainer to charge more for those corner units where the staggering occurs. Nice design, if this is actually pretty close to the real deal.

intrepidDesign · #**17450** Posted **Jan 28, 2015, 9:31 PM**

I get what you're saying about the south wall taking advantage of the sunlight, I kinda wish this was the north wall facing grant park, or even the east, just so when looking south at the park it's not just a flat wall all the way up. Plus from a financial standpoint, you could charge exorbitant prices for such large and private green space facing the park. I guess it's moot since Arm&Kedzie said ". It appears the side facing the park has a flat face and no step backs on that side" Missed opportunity in my book, still pretty cool though if accurate.

Arm&Kedzie · #**17451** Posted **Jan 28, 2015, 9:54 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steely Dan

30 second sketch-up.

right track or wrong track?

Right Track for sure, the top termination is a bit narrower. The base of the tower is more rectangular with a semi-podium 'butt' sticking out towards the south. The terminations are more stretched out over the height of the building and not clustered quite as high. Basically stretch your model and add a 'butt' and you got it.

Also what I thought was two different claddings.. upon closer inspection looks to be large blocks of recessed balconies.(not positive about this).

It looks like most of the terminations/ roof terraces are on the South and West sides of the building.

Arm&Kedzie · #**17452** Posted **Jan 28, 2015, 10:03 PM**

When looking at the building from grant park it has terminations on the sides so it's not a big heavy rectangle.

Steely Dan · #**17453** Posted **Jan 28, 2015, 10:13 PM**

closer?

LouisVanDerWright · #**17454** Posted **Jan 28, 2015, 10:27 PM**

I see my services aren't needed here, haha. Steely's totally got this, he's basically got everything in the description. In any case, this description sure is intriguing to me. I really like 432 Park and if this has the same quality, but minimalist, detailing as Park then consider me sold.

chrisvfr800i · #**17455** Posted **Jan 28, 2015, 10:35 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steely Dan

closer?

I'm staring at a massing model of the building....I'd post it if it wasn't such a PITA!

Right track, though.

LouisVanDerWright · #**17456** Posted **Jan 28, 2015, 10:37 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by chrisvfr800i

I'm staring at a massing model of the building....I'd post it if it wasn't such a PITA!

Right track, though.

Cellphone picture and email it to me, I'll PM you my email...

Ryanrule · #**17457** Posted **Jan 28, 2015, 10:39 PM**

is this condos or rentals?

munchymunch · #**17458** Posted **Jan 28, 2015, 10:43 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by chrisvfr800i

I'm staring at a massing model of the building....I'd post it if it wasn't such a PITA!

Right track, though.

Please now.

joeg1985 · #**17459** Posted **Jan 28, 2015, 11:00 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by intrepidDesign

I get what you're saying about the south wall taking advantage of the sunlight, I kinda wish this was the north wall facing grant park, or even the east, just so when looking south at the park it's not just a flat wall all the way up. Plus from a financial standpoint, you could charge exorbitant prices for such large and private green space facing the park. I guess it's moot since Arm&Kedzie said ". It appears the side facing the park has a flat face and no step backs on that side" Missed opportunity in my book, still pretty cool though if accurate.

That was my thought exactly! That the terminations should be on the north part. Not only more visually appealing from "Chicago's front yard" but also that having a green space facing the park would cost the consumer more. Seems like a win/win scenario to me.

XIII · #**17460** Posted **Jan 28, 2015, 11:28 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by chrisvfr800i

I'm staring at a massing model of the building....I'd post it if it wasn't such a PITA!

Right track, though.

Agreed. If it comes out like this, it could be a great addition to the park wall.
Feeling less nervous and a bit more excited.