I usually don't say things being built outside SLC ought to be built in SLC. That's mostly other people besides Comrade and me who have frequently said those things. I would love to see more things being in SLC, though, but I don't generally comment on that.
And I have commented on many things I like. I like EPAC, I really like 151. 111 will be pretty good, not great. I like City Creek, mostly.
I love it when suburban areas are trying to develop more urban like areas, but very few are and most of the projects in the suburbs are very far from it. I am, however, skeptical of anything happening in Sandy specifically.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLC Projects
The problem is they both come across as two very bitter, unhappy, glass half empty, anti everything that isn't Salt Lake City commenting in a troll like manner 98% of the time with negative after negative posts that can drain the life out of this forum. Yes everybody is entitle to their opinions, but even those opinions seem to be soooooo far unrealistic that I don't think they will ever come across a development they truly love here in a smaller market like Salt Lake that they would see else where say.....New York, LA or Boston. Every time something gets posted on here over the years that is getting develop somewhere outside of Salt Lake that ( I think most of us on here feels is refreshing to see other cities at the very least try to be more urban ) we get comments about how negative the development will be to that area and how it doesn't belong there and should ONLY be in downtown Salt Lake. And then when there's ANY kind of development that does happen downtown it then becomes "god awful", "ugly", "something a kindergarten came up with" and that it "belongs in the suburbs" ect.
I think Ken said it best on here. "I don't see you investing and coming out with your own development" or something to those lines.
And for the new guy to only be on here for a short period of time and has already notice those two negativity says a lot.
|