I want to repeat my question about Hamilton and Toronto with telephoto compression. I remember people complaining about making mountains looking like they're almost within cities they're far from, so I was wondering if Toronto could be made to look way closer to Hamilton.
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell). Sweet Loretta fart thought she was a cleaner, but she was a frying pan. (John Lennon)
Amazing. Second best (after Vancouver) natural setting for a biggish city in Canada.
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell). Sweet Loretta fart thought she was a cleaner, but she was a frying pan. (John Lennon)
^ I would have to agree..Both QC and Vancouver have amazing natural settings..Playing the "what if" game..Imagine the back drop if both Yellowknife or Niagara Falls were major centres?..Couldn't somebody bring in the falls closer to Toronto using some sort of super duper telephoto lens?..Seen zanier things on here.
Yeah I didn't realize that... but whatever... I meant simply that N F has a taller building than Hamilton, Winnipeg, Regina and Saskatoon. Cities far larger, and I'm talking about the city of N F, 82 000, not Niagara Region.
Can a photoshop expert place Niagara falls, the rocky mountains, Vancouver and the Chateau Frontenac into one shot?..No not the old Maple leafs gardens too..Sorry..
^ Did you post your picture thread from the summer yet?
__________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw Don't ask people not to debate a topic. Just stop making debatable assertions. Problem solved.
Prev
[/IMG]
[/IMG]
Linear Mode
