HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8921  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2014, 7:05 PM
fusili's Avatar
fusili fusili is offline
Retrofit Urbanist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rusty van Reddick View Post
"Densification" is a real word.
As Calvin from Calvin and Hobbes would say "You are verbing the word". I like verbing words. For instance, many stores on 17th have now been "Hipstered."
__________________
Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.
     
     
  #8922  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2014, 10:10 PM
MichaelS's Avatar
MichaelS MichaelS is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe498 View Post

-

Can't exactly say I am thrilled about this idea. In contrast to funding projects like the SE/NC LRT. Just another $100m in the wrong direction.
Wrong direction? The whole intent is to upgrade the pedestrian realm and provide safer cycling facilities. No increase in traffic capacity. In fact, I think it even removes a couple of interchanges from the books.
     
     
  #8923  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2014, 10:42 PM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,498
Quote:
“It’s a tough one,” said Coun. Gian-Carlo Carra, vice-chairman of the city’s transportation and transit committee. “In our cash-strapped environment, when we don’t have money to do everything, is this a priority? But at the same point, if you want to do it at any point, you have to start now.”
This annoys me. Why are we a cash strapped environment? We live in the province with the strongest economy in Canada, yet there is no money? What's the point of us destroying our environment with one of the dirtiest industries there is, if we don't reap the rewards off of it? There really needs to be a political shift on this.

As to Macleod trail, the road is so awful it's almost beyond repair. Any road that grows to 4+ lanes, especially one like Macleod with stop lights is a failure of planning. If we want it to be a vibrant 'urban boulevard' then it has to stop being a key commuter road, but those commuters have to go somewhere. The SLRT is right next to it and is close to capacity, so it's not like we're failing badly on providing transit - but I would suggest the first course of action would be to replace a the central lanes with transit lanes to allow some half decent BRT, which could potentially be faster than car traffic.
     
     
  #8924  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2014, 10:58 PM
fusili's Avatar
fusili fusili is offline
Retrofit Urbanist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by milomilo View Post

As to Macleod trail, the road is so awful it's almost beyond repair. Any road that grows to 4+ lanes, especially one like Macleod with stop lights is a failure of planning.
Market Street in San Francisco, every single avenue in New York, Yonge Street in Toronto, Gracia in Barcelona, St. Catherine's in Montreal, Robson, Cambie, Broadway in Vancouver, etc etc etc. I could go on. Having traffic lights is not a failure of planning. If you think every road that has over 4 lanes should be free-flow, you need to rethink what you consider good urban planning.
__________________
Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.
     
     
  #8925  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2014, 11:39 PM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,498
Quote:
Originally Posted by fusili View Post
Market Street in San Francisco, every single avenue in New York, Yonge Street in Toronto, Gracia in Barcelona, St. Catherine's in Montreal, Robson, Cambie, Broadway in Vancouver, etc etc etc. I could go on. Having traffic lights is not a failure of planning. If you think every road that has over 4 lanes should be free-flow, you need to rethink what you consider good urban planning.
That's not actually what I wrote - I said any road, but especially ones which which aren't being used as high speed corridors (to clarify though, I meant 4 lanes in each direction). I'm sure there are plenty of examples of 4x4 roads in urban areas, but I don't agree that so much space dedicated to vehicles is in any way conducive to a pleasant environment.
     
     
  #8926  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2014, 12:00 AM
MasterG's Avatar
MasterG MasterG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by milomilo View Post
That's not actually what I wrote - I said any road, but especially ones which which aren't being used as high speed corridors (to clarify though, I meant 4 lanes in each direction). I'm sure there are plenty of examples of 4x4 roads in urban areas, but I don't agree that so much space dedicated to vehicles is in any way conducive to a pleasant environment.
I partially agree. But the Macleod Trail from Cemetery to Chinook suffers from a uniquely poor design for anything else other than cars. It would be hard to shit on pedestrians more next to a high-capacity and well-used LRT line. 39th Ave station comes obviously to mind, but Chinook station is a close second (until the recent renovation). But it is more than the stations themselves that need to be redone:
  • 60km/h next to a 1.5 metre sidewalk with no fringe
  • partial or closed ped crossings everywhere like Chinook where although most peds come from the station, they are forced to divert north to cross the 10 lane configuration of Macleod
  • Every light gives priority to through commuter traffic at the expense of crossing to the LRT stations. Forcing peds and cross traffic to wait in a shitty, loud and concrete environment for up to 4 minutes to cross the road.
  • channelized turn lanes promote high-speed turns at intersections, reducing the feeling that you should be walking here
  • countless developments have many exit-extrance ramps to front parking lots creating even more conflict zones and no pedestrian oriented anything.

Hopefully the pedestrian bridge at Macleod by Chinook and some ped improvements there will help in the coming years, at least in that area. The problem isn't that it is just a big road - it's a shitty big road that could hardly try harder to make it unpleasant to be a pedestrian, even though the LRT is literally metres away.

Blackfoot Trail I get it if there is resistance to making it nicer because it sucks and will always be a low-pedestrian, industrial 6-lane road until land-use patterns change dramatically. That may never happen. But Macleod is next to a 100,000 person per day transit system that has pedestrians using it, including one of the busiest stops outside of downtown.

South of Glenmore, the case is much less strong given the (somehow) even greater amount of crappiness around the road. But north of Glenmore improvement is not only doable but is required.
__________________
From the right side of the wrong side of the tracks.
     
     
  #8927  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2014, 2:05 AM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,498
I agree pretty much 100%, it's going to be a long process to fix though - all the stores around it are very auto-centric. Even Chinook is just a little bit too far to make LRT the best option.
     
     
  #8928  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2014, 3:02 AM
RyLucky's Avatar
RyLucky RyLucky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,498
Quote:
Originally Posted by milomilo View Post
I agree pretty much 100%, it's going to be a long process to fix though - all the stores around it are very auto-centric. Even Chinook is just a little bit too far to make LRT the best option.
It's fine if the existing stores are auto-centric. They can enter through the alleyway and depress land values until demand overtakes them.

That's why this is a good idea. If we can take an $8M parking lot and drive through right next to SFH-zoned property worth at least as much but far less flexible in Elboya, spend $100k on it, and build a $20M three-storey office there, it's a massive win, even if it only works on 5-10% of lots in the first decade.

The trouble is that as things are, even people on this forum think there is no hope for a pedestrian corridor there. That's why this has to be a public project instead of just allowing drive-thrus to turn over one-by-one as demand increases.

I'm not saying this only has to do with pedestrian infrastructure, but look at past successes in Calgary: 13th Ave through the what was the worst part of the Beltline, 1st st sidewalk improvements through a dusty old bus corridor, Riverwalk through the notorious east village... All of these places are now bustling success stories.
     
     
  #8929  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2014, 3:37 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,607
Quote:
Originally Posted by milomilo View Post
This annoys me. Why are we a cash strapped environment? We live in the province with the strongest economy in Canada, yet there is no money? What's the point of us destroying our environment with one of the dirtiest industries there is, if we don't reap the rewards off of it? There really needs to be a political shift on this.
We have Texas taxes and Swedish services. That is where the royalty money goes. Also, oil sands have a back loaded revenue model, which is why we have seen royalties from them explode over the past few years, and they will continue to grow (but with a lag compared to growth in consturction of new production). Earlier, most royalty revenue came from natural gas, but Alberta hit peak gas (fortunately around the time of peak gas prices), and has been in transition ever since.
     
     
  #8930  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2014, 6:42 PM
simster3 simster3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 286
Quote:
Originally Posted by MalcolmTucker View Post
We have Texas taxes and Swedish services.
I like that line a lot. Good description.
     
     
  #8931  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2014, 1:36 AM
sim sim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 863
Quote:
Originally Posted by MalcolmTucker View Post
We have Texas taxes and Swedish services. That is where the royalty money goes. Also, oil sands have a back loaded revenue model, which is why we have seen royalties from them explode over the past few years, and they will continue to grow (but with a lag compared to growth in consturction of new production). Earlier, most royalty revenue came from natural gas, but Alberta hit peak gas (fortunately around the time of peak gas prices), and has been in transition ever since.
Yeah, like passenger rail..

I like the line too, I just don't quite think it's true.
     
     
  #8932  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2014, 2:10 AM
Policy Wonk's Avatar
Policy Wonk Policy Wonk is offline
Inflatable Hippo
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Suburban Las Vegas
Posts: 4,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by RyLucky View Post
The trouble is that as things are, even people on this forum think there is no hope for a pedestrian corridor there. That's why this has to be a public project instead of just allowing drive-thrus to turn over one-by-one as demand increases.
Perhaps the question to be asked is why is it imperative that MacLeod Trail be transformed into a pedestrian corridor in the first place? Why should be basis of alternate transport modes be mirroring traditional high-volume road based ones?

It's not like this is Taranda Dhak.
__________________
Public Administration 101: Keep your mouth shut until obligated otherwise and don't get in public debates with housewives.
     
     
  #8933  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2014, 2:39 AM
Policy Wonk's Avatar
Policy Wonk Policy Wonk is offline
Inflatable Hippo
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Suburban Las Vegas
Posts: 4,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by sim View Post
Yeah, like passenger rail..
Oh yeah, subsidizing a service nobody wanted would have been a great use of Alberta's resources when oil was under $10 a barrel in the mid-80's.
__________________
Public Administration 101: Keep your mouth shut until obligated otherwise and don't get in public debates with housewives.
     
     
  #8934  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2014, 3:39 AM
MichaelS's Avatar
MichaelS MichaelS is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by Policy Wonk View Post
Perhaps the question to be asked is why is it imperative that MacLeod Trail be transformed into a pedestrian corridor in the first place? Why should be basis of alternate transport modes be mirroring traditional high-volume road based ones?

It's not like this is Taranda Dhak.
Well that question should have been asked back when Plan-It was being written. Both the MDP and CTP identify Macleod Trail as an Urban Boulevard/Corridor. Will council update those documents if this study is voted down? Frustrating and difficult to actually build a city when everyone who says they love the plan get flakey when shown the bill. Maybe the real frustration is that the plan was chosen without considering the bill in the first place.
     
     
  #8935  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2014, 3:38 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,607
Quote:
Originally Posted by sim View Post
Yeah, like passenger rail..

I like the line too, I just don't quite think it's true.
I challenge you to find another saying that conveys the same point yet still rhymes.

But yeah, Albertan's pay a fair amount less taxes municipally and provincially, and we spend more on capital and services. That is where the money is going, straight back into your pocket.
     
     
  #8936  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2014, 1:31 AM
sim sim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Policy Wonk View Post
Oh yeah, subsidizing a service nobody wanted would have been a great use of Alberta's resources when oil was under $10 a barrel in the mid-80's.
Oh yeah, that's what I said. But if we are going to go be inane, myopic, linear in our thinking, and play on your usual M.O., why don't we apply that same completely irrelevant supposition to urban roads all those years ago? Heck, why not now?

This is where you write a paragraph reasserting your ostensible omniscience on and against a point I never made to begin with. Enjoy!
     
     
  #8937  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2014, 4:27 PM
DizzyEdge's Avatar
DizzyEdge DizzyEdge is offline
My Spoon Is Too Big
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,162
Does anyone know if our articulated buses have these handles in the 'accordion' so people can stand there and have something to hold on to?

__________________
Concerned about protecting Calgary's built heritage?
www.CalgaryHeritage.org
News - Heritage Watch - Forums
     
     
  #8938  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2014, 5:15 PM
Policy Wonk's Avatar
Policy Wonk Policy Wonk is offline
Inflatable Hippo
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Suburban Las Vegas
Posts: 4,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by sim View Post
Oh yeah, that's what I said. But if we are going to go be inane, myopic, linear in our thinking, and play on your usual M.O., why don't we apply that same completely irrelevant supposition to urban roads all those years ago? Heck, why not now?

This is where you write a paragraph reasserting your ostensible omniscience on and against a point I never made to begin with. Enjoy!
So what were you saying?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MalcolmTucker View Post
We have Texas taxes and Swedish services.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sim View Post
Yeah, like passenger rail..

I like the line too, I just don't quite think it's true.
I think most people would interpret this statement to mean you perceive passenger rail to be a government service the Alberta government is failing to provide that invalidates the statement of "European" level services.

This being something that just wasn't fiscally possible at the time the VIA Dayliner service ended and today it would just be a criminal misappropriation of funds.

In any event there isn't a paragraph to be written on the subject. Something unneeded finally went away and many years later than it should have. The End.
__________________
Public Administration 101: Keep your mouth shut until obligated otherwise and don't get in public debates with housewives.
     
     
  #8939  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2014, 6:29 PM
MichaelS's Avatar
MichaelS MichaelS is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by DizzyEdge View Post
Does anyone know if our articulated buses have these handles in the 'accordion' so people can stand there and have something to hold on to?
Not that I have ever seen.
     
     
  #8940  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2014, 6:36 PM
MasterG's Avatar
MasterG MasterG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelS View Post
Not that I have ever seen.
Seems like the brand-new ones do, the older bendies do not.
__________________
From the right side of the wrong side of the tracks.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:28 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.