HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #101  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2014, 4:06 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Imagine how absolutely incredible this view will be in 3 years with Brookfield Place between Suncor and EAP, and Telus Sky between The Bow and Suncor. A wall of giants


Calgary Skyline Northeast by Chadillaccc, on Flickr
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #102  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2014, 4:14 AM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant - The New Downtown South
Posts: 8,124
The Calgary Tower is pretty pointless at this time. Plus it's pretty damn ugly. Blow it up and replace with a quality residential tower. That part of downtown Calgary needs some work.
     
     
  #103  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2014, 4:17 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #104  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2014, 4:18 AM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
Imagine how absolutely incredible this view will be in 3 years with Brookfield Place between Suncor and EAP, and Telus Sky between The Bow and Suncor. A wall of giants
Indeed... the Suncor, Bow, EAP, Brookfield Place and Telus Sky cluster will soon approach the levels of density found in Toronto's CBD prior to the boom when it consisted of FCP, Scotia Plaza, TD Centre, CCW, Canada Trust Tower and Bay-Wellington Tower. In terms of CBD height and density, visually speaking at least, Calgary in 2018 will be roughly in the same ballpark as Toronto between 1992 and 2007!

Edit: These diagrams help to show the comparison. Calgary's size and number of highrises in 2018 (http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?searchID=65206117) pretty much goes toe-to-toe with Toronto in 2006 (http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?searchID=65206177) for over the first 4 pages/100 entries.

The scary thing is that Toronto highrises built only after 2007 (http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?searchID=65206158) blows them both out of the water.

Last edited by Ramako; Aug 15, 2014 at 4:35 AM.
     
     
  #105  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2014, 4:19 AM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by logan5 View Post
The Calgary Tower is pretty pointless at this time. Plus it's pretty damn ugly. Blow it up and replace with a quality residential tower. That part of downtown Calgary needs some work.
I'd be curious to hear from Calgarians... how cherished and revered is the Calgary Tower? Is it considered untouchable or is there actually a chance that it could ever be demolished in favour of some massive development?
     
     
  #106  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2014, 4:28 AM
Doug_Cgy Doug_Cgy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 1,142
With longtime Calgarians, it's very cherished. It's a creature of its time, and I think it's a good symbol of our city. Could be worse, we could be stuck with the FUGLY Harbour Centre, tower plopped on a hideous building monstrosity
     
     
  #107  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2014, 4:33 AM
Allan83 Allan83 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,410
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramako View Post
Indeed... the Suncor, Bow, EAP, Brookfield Place and Telus Sky cluster will soon approach the levels of density found in Toronto's CBD prior to the boom when it consisted of FCP, Scotia Plaza, TD Centre, CCW, Canada Trust Tower and Bay-Wellington Tower. In terms of CBD height and density, visually speaking at least, Calgary in 2018 will be roughly in the same ballpark as Toronto between 1992 and 2007!
And that gives you an idea of just how dense Calgary’s CBD is. In 2007 Toronto had a population of about 5 million. Calgary in 2018 should have a population of somewhere around 1.6 million.
     
     
  #108  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2014, 4:34 AM
Allan83 Allan83 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,410
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramako View Post
I'd be curious to hear from Calgarians... how cherished and revered is the Calgary Tower? Is it considered untouchable or is there actually a chance that it could ever be demolished in favour of some massive development?
The short answer is no, but a better question is why would you even consider doing that? It’s not like there aren’t any other development sites. Would Torontonians consider tearing down the CN Tower and putting in a big development? Maybe you would, and maybe that’s why you ask the question, but I’m quite sure Calgary wouldn’t be interested in that, although extending the Calgary tower is a realistic possibility, although currently no one is talking about doing it.
     
     
  #109  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2014, 4:41 AM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant - The New Downtown South
Posts: 8,124
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug_Cgy View Post
With longtime Calgarians, it's very cherished. It's a creature of its time, and I think it's a good symbol of our city. Could be worse, we could be stuck with the FUGLY Harbour Centre, tower plopped on a hideous building monstrosity
If Harbour Centre were to disappear, I wouldn't shed any tears, but it has some function with all its office space. The Calgary Tower is suppose to be an observation deck. Obviously obsolete. Other than that it has no function, not even from an architectural standpoint. I guess Calgarians find some sentimental value in it, but man it sure is ugly, especially these days with so many great buildings surrounding it.
     
     
  #110  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2014, 4:44 AM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allan83 View Post
The short answer is no, but a better question is why would you even consider doing that? It’s not like there aren’t any other development sites. Would Torontonians consider tearing down the CN Tower and putting in a big development? Maybe you would, and maybe that’s why you ask the question, but I’m quite sure Calgary wouldn’t be interested in that, although extending the Calgary tower is a realistic possibility, although currently no one is talking about doing it.
I asked the question because the poster above me suggested that it be demolished. Whether it holds the same place in hearts and minds of Calgarians as the CN Tower does with Torontonians is not something I could speak to, not having ever spent any time in Calgary. I was just curious.
     
     
  #111  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2014, 4:57 AM
Allan83 Allan83 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,410
Quote:
Originally Posted by logan5 View Post
If Harbour Centre were to disappear, I wouldn't shed any tears, but it has some function with all its office space. The Calgary Tower is suppose to be an observation deck. Obviously obsolete. Other than that it has no function, not even from an architectural standpoint. I guess Calgarians find some sentimental value in it, but man it sure is ugly, especially these days with so many great buildings surrounding it.
Not at all. Lots of great pictures posted on this site are taken from there.

Ugly? I guess its ugliness is a function of time, but I think most Calgarians like to preserve our historic buildings, and I’m sure that in the fullness of time it will look pretty again.
     
     
  #112  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2014, 5:13 AM
Wooster's Avatar
Wooster Wooster is offline
Round Head
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,688
Quote:
Originally Posted by logan5 View Post
If Harbour Centre were to disappear, I wouldn't shed any tears, but it has some function with all its office space. The Calgary Tower is suppose to be an observation deck. Obviously obsolete. Other than that it has no function, not even from an architectural standpoint. I guess Calgarians find some sentimental value in it, but man it sure is ugly, especially these days with so many great buildings surrounding it.
Why is it obsolete? Great view of the core of buildings to its north - unobstructed views of the city and mountains the other 180 degrees. It's an icon. It stays.
     
     
  #113  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2014, 5:16 AM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant - The New Downtown South
Posts: 8,124
In Vancouver, Brazilian graffiti artist Gustavo and Otavio Pandalfo are going to paint those huge concrete silos on Granville island, maybe they could do the same for the Calgary Tower.



http://www.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=http%...rc&uact=3&dur=955&page=2&start=6&ndsp=11
     
     
  #114  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2014, 5:19 AM
middeljohn middeljohn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Burlington, ON
Posts: 1,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramako View Post
Indeed... the Suncor, Bow, EAP, Brookfield Place and Telus Sky cluster will soon approach the levels of density found in Toronto's CBD prior to the boom when it consisted of FCP, Scotia Plaza, TD Centre, CCW, Canada Trust Tower and Bay-Wellington Tower. In terms of CBD height and density, visually speaking at least, Calgary in 2018 will be roughly in the same ballpark as Toronto between 1992 and 2007!

Edit: These diagrams help to show the comparison. Calgary's size and number of highrises in 2018 (http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?searchID=65206117) pretty much goes toe-to-toe with Toronto in 2006 (http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?searchID=65206177) for over the first 4 pages/100 entries.

The scary thing is that Toronto highrises built only after 2007 (http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?searchID=65206158) blows them both out of the water.
The unfortunate downside to this, with Calgary having a massive downtown, disproportionately large for its population, is that after 6pm it's essentially a ghost town. Here in Edmonton I'm most definitely jealous of some of their towers, however with similarly sized like Edmonton and Calgary having proportionately sized downtowns, it still stays quite active after work hours.
     
     
  #115  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2014, 5:32 AM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by middeljohn View Post
The unfortunate downside to this, with Calgary having a massive downtown, disproportionately large for its population, is that after 6pm it's essentially a ghost town. Here in Edmonton I'm most definitely jealous of some of their towers, however with similarly sized like Edmonton and Calgary having proportionately sized downtowns, it still stays quite active after work hours.
Down the line, an influx of residential and hotel towers into the core (like Toronto is currently experiencing) will help to add more round-the-clock life to downtown. Calgarians can probably look forward to that occuring during the next big boom. It's already kind of starting with Telus Sky.
     
     
  #116  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2014, 5:32 AM
isaidso isaidso is offline
North of Gilead
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Gilead
Posts: 11,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramako View Post
I'd be curious to hear from Calgarians... how cherished and revered is the Calgary Tower? Is it considered untouchable or is there actually a chance that it could ever be demolished in favour of some massive development?
I wanted to rhyme in then stopped myself just in time.

I don't think it's doing for Calgary what the CN Tower does for Toronto or the Oriental Pearl does for Shanghai. I'll leave it at that.
__________________
ELBOWS UP CANADA, ELBOWS UP UKRAINE, ELBOWS UP GREENLAND
CANADA, EUROPE, NZ, AUSTRALIA, JAPAN, MEXICO STRONG

US REPUBLICANS/MAGA/ICE NOT WELCOME HERE, STAY OUT
     
     
  #117  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2014, 5:43 AM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by isaidso View Post
I wanted to rhyme in then stopped myself just in time.

I don't think it's doing for Calgary what the CN Tower does for Toronto or the Oriental Pearl does for Shanghai. I'll leave it at that.
In terms of what it "does" for Toronto, I'm guessing your meaning is that, beyond its function as a symbol, communications tower or observation deck, the CN Tower acts as a psychological anchor for Torontonians, in that wherever you are in the city you can instantly orient yourself by finding the tower, kind of like the North Star. There's something reassuring about its - for lack of a better word - omnipresence.

That's not to say that Calgary Tower isn't equally important to Calgarians for a different set of reasons, but it's worth noting when comparing the respective roles of the two towers.
     
     
  #118  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2014, 5:55 AM
TallBob TallBob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,135
Calgary (Husky) Tower, is quite ugly.... Having said that, there are several ways to remedy that and make it a "nice looking" structure (hide or cover-up the core somehow) would be a start. I doubt however, that will happen.
     
     
  #119  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2014, 5:56 AM
isaidso isaidso is offline
North of Gilead
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Gilead
Posts: 11,056
The CN Tower and Calgary Tower are symbols of their respective cities. Despite its age, I feel the CN Tower is still viewed as a marvel and a huge asset for this city. It's world famous and influences people's perceptions of Toronto: tourists and those who've never been here. The reaction to the Calgary Tower isn't as favourable imo.

Is it a benefit or a does it detract? I think Calgary deserves something better, but in the end that's for them to decide.
__________________
ELBOWS UP CANADA, ELBOWS UP UKRAINE, ELBOWS UP GREENLAND
CANADA, EUROPE, NZ, AUSTRALIA, JAPAN, MEXICO STRONG

US REPUBLICANS/MAGA/ICE NOT WELCOME HERE, STAY OUT
     
     
  #120  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2014, 6:22 AM
Symz's Avatar
Symz Symz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Windsor, On.
Posts: 1,873
We visited Calgary about 3 weeks ago. We went up in the tower, thought it was great and we had fun. There were lots of other people up there doing the same. What else could you ask for?
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:50 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.